StringBean7

StringBean7 — CS2 Stats

US76561198272941040[U:1:312675312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,335Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,016Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74539 of 231264 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,552 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 12 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,016 +5,017 12 May18 Sept · 29 days played
14,99920,016peak 20,01612 May18 Sept
20,122Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-05-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,552
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 199 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,016
  • +1,699 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,984 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStringBean7FACEITLevel 7 · 1,552 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,016 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,552csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.7pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 694ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility7.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time688ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 705ms → last ⅓ avg 688ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 20 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 1 Jun
516msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 3 Jun
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 20 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB25131252%0.01
mirageA22121055%0.02
ancientB168850%0.02
anubisD113827%-0.02
infernoS97278%0.01
dust2S86275%0.01
cacheS65183%0.01
overpass21150%-0.00
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,063Matches
49%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
73.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient29450%1.0414.5
Anubis28347%1.0114.9
Nuke21359%1.1415.5
Mirage16147%0.9915.0
Vertigo12749%1.0214.7
Inferno11141%1.0114.5
Dust26837%0.8213.5
Overpass5355%1.0516.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
694msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.79HE damage / grenade
19.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.019%18 Sept
nuke13–90.0312%18 Sept
mirage13–60.0324%14 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.0622%14 Sept
cache13–110.0810%13 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0314%12 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0514%12 Sept
nuke13–100.0824%6 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0122%6 Sept
ancient13–50.0126%3 Sept
ancient6–130.0412%30 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0213%30 Aug
cache5–13-0.0019%16 Aug
inferno13–60.019%16 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0318%8 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0313%8 Aug
inferno16–12-0.028%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0315%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0714%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.039%27 Jul
nuke13–50.0713%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0421%27 Jul
nuke13–50.0822%26 Jul
nuke13–110.0325%26 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0316%26 Jul
cache13–10-0.015%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.064%19 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0420%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0636%19 Jul
dust213–50.0519%18 Jul
cache13–20.0712%18 Jul
nuke13–70.1221%18 Jul
anubis11–130.0320%5 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0115%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0711%27 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0413%26 Jun
mirage10–130.0010%26 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0217%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0115%21 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0221%21 Jun
nuke13–40.0315%21 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0419%21 Jun
ancient13–60.0530%21 Jun
ancient13–00.1924%20 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0417%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0117%16 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0123%16 Jun
mirage13–40.1013%16 Jun
mirage9–130.0214%16 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0217%16 Jun
nuke14–160.0119%14 Jun
inferno13–90.0525%14 Jun
dust216–140.0223%14 Jun
anubis13–100.0114%14 Jun
ancient13–100.0115%14 Jun
mirage12–160.0023%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0012%13 Jun
nuke8–130.0012%13 Jun
nuke13–60.0014%13 Jun
mirage9–130.0326%11 Jun
mirage13–110.0625%10 Jun
dust213–40.0322%10 Jun
nuke8–130.0118%8 Jun
mirage10–130.0033%8 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0315%7 Jun
inferno13–50.0519%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0319%7 Jun
nuke13–100.0612%7 Jun
inferno13–110.0623%7 Jun
dust213–40.0732%7 Jun
ancient13–100.0627%7 Jun
mirage13–70.0521%7 Jun
nuke9–130.0330%7 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0416%7 Jun
inferno13–70.0122%6 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0222%6 Jun
mirage16–140.0215%6 Jun
dust213–60.0621%6 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0317%6 Jun
anubis5–130.0519%5 Jun
dust213–11-0.0513%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0312%3 Jun
dust26–13-0.0519%3 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0318%3 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0221%3 Jun
nuke13–90.0538%1 Jun
anubis12–16-0.0325%1 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0917%31 May
nuke2–13-0.0712%22 May
ancient13–70.0421%22 May
mirage13–90.0710%22 May
ancient5–130.0023%19 May
overpass6–13-0.0620%16 May
nuke15–15-0.0414%16 May
anubis13–10-0.0112%16 May
cache13–10-0.108%16 May
cache16–140.0322%14 May
overpass22–190.0517%13 May
mirage13–50.0833%12 May
nuke8–130.0124%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →