StringBean7

StringBean7 — CS2 Stats

US76561198272941040[U:1:312675312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,351Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,472Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61468 of 251770 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,552 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−181Premier CS Rating · 21,653 → 21,472

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,472 +6,472 3 Jun – 14 Oct · 34 days played
15,00021,977peak 21,9773 Jun14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,552 +0 30 Aug – 25 Sept · 3 observations
1,5521,552peak 1,55230 Aug25 Sept
21,977Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,552
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 199 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 505 below peak (21,977)
  • +1,473 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,295 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,528 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStringBean7FACEITLevel 7 · 1,552 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,472 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,552csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning45
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–44Last 10056%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility8.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.5
Utility8.0
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time640ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 20 Jun →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · mirage, 19 Jul →
469msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 14 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 20 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2415–963%0.02
mirageB2110–1148%0.01
ancientB157–847%0.02
infernoS1410–471%0.00
anubisD93–633%-0.01
dust2S96–367%0.00
cacheS75–271%0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,063Matches
49%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
73.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient29450%1.0414.5
Anubis28347%1.0114.9
Nuke21359%1.1415.5
Mirage16147%0.9915.0
Vertigo12749%1.0214.7
Inferno11141%1.0114.5
Dust26837%0.8213.5
Overpass5355%1.0516.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
89.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
641msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
10.73HE damage / grenade
18.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.391% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–3-0.0125%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0519%14 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0215%12 Oct →
nuke13–100.0417%11 Oct →
cache13–50.0314%11 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0116%10 Oct →
ancient8–130.0018%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.1025%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.049%2 Oct →
nuke13–100.0412%2 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0914%27 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0320%27 Sept →
cache13–40.0726%27 Sept →
inferno13–70.0319%26 Sept →
cache10–130.0328%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0323%26 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.019%18 Sept →
nuke13–90.0312%18 Sept →
mirage13–60.0324%14 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.0622%14 Sept →
cache13–110.0810%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0314%12 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0514%12 Sept →
nuke13–100.0824%6 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0122%6 Sept →
ancient13–50.0126%3 Sept →
ancient6–130.0412%30 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0213%30 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0019%16 Aug →
inferno13–60.019%16 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0318%8 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0313%8 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.028%28 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0315%27 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0714%27 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.039%27 Jul →
nuke13–50.0713%27 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0421%27 Jul →
nuke13–50.0822%26 Jul →
nuke13–110.0325%26 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0316%26 Jul →
cache13–10-0.015%26 Jul →
dust26–13-0.064%19 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0420%19 Jul →
mirage10–130.0636%19 Jul →
dust213–50.0519%18 Jul →
cache13–20.0712%18 Jul →
nuke13–70.1221%18 Jul →
anubis11–130.0320%5 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0115%5 Jul →
ancient13–80.0711%27 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0413%26 Jun →
mirage10–130.0010%26 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0217%25 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0115%21 Jun →
ancient13–5-0.0221%21 Jun →
nuke13–40.0315%21 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0419%21 Jun →
ancient13–60.0530%21 Jun →
ancient13–00.1924%20 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0417%20 Jun →
mirage13–50.0117%16 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0123%16 Jun →
mirage13–40.1013%16 Jun →
mirage9–130.0214%16 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0217%16 Jun →
nuke14–160.0119%14 Jun →
inferno13–90.0525%14 Jun →
dust216–140.0223%14 Jun →
anubis13–100.0114%14 Jun →
ancient13–100.0115%14 Jun →
mirage12–160.0023%14 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0012%13 Jun →
nuke8–130.0012%13 Jun →
nuke13–60.0014%13 Jun →
mirage9–130.0326%11 Jun →
mirage13–110.0625%10 Jun →
dust213–40.0322%10 Jun →
nuke8–130.0118%8 Jun →
mirage10–130.0033%8 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0315%7 Jun →
inferno13–50.0519%7 Jun →
mirage13–90.0319%7 Jun →
nuke13–100.0612%7 Jun →
inferno13–110.0623%7 Jun →
dust213–40.0732%7 Jun →
ancient13–100.0627%7 Jun →
mirage13–70.0521%7 Jun →
nuke9–130.0330%7 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0416%7 Jun →
inferno13–70.0122%6 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0222%6 Jun →
mirage16–140.0215%6 Jun →
dust213–60.0621%6 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0317%6 Jun →
anubis5–130.0519%5 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0513%4 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0312%3 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0519%3 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0318%3 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.