я ē 𝗯 ù 𝐤 — CS2 Stats

76561197975790833[U:1:15525105]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,786Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating22,326Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#47263 of 231082 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,326 +4,302 27 Jul – 17 Sept · 36 days played

23,826Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,710Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

36Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,710
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 41 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

889 below peak (23,215)
+475 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,674 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning66

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 35%
Avg reaction 475ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 35%
Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

8–11–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 37%
Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6

Utility5.2

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 68% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning6.6

Utility5.2

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels5.8

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time564ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms

Headshot accuracy35.8%+4.6%

first ⅓ avg 31.2% → last ⅓ avg 35.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 13 Aug →

55%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 16 Sept →

422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 5 Aug →

13–2Biggest win · inferno, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

14–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11nukeWeakest map · 44% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	19	9–10	47%	0.01
nuke	C	18	8–10	44%	0.02
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.02
cache	A	16	10–6	63%	0.01
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
mirage	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
dust2	A	8	5–3	63%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,618Matches

50%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

73.1ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	169	50%	0.99	15.4
Anubis	136	42%	0.96	15.6
Nuke	118	63%	1.16	17.0
Mirage	106	50%	0.95	15.1
Vertigo	70	49%	1.01	15.5
Inferno	58	41%	1.06	15.8
Dust2	56	43%	0.91	14.7
Train	16	38%	1.08	14.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

36.5%Headshot accuracy

34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.6%Spray accuracy

78.9%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

567msReaction time

38.4%T opening success

68.0%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

2.8%Flash assists

7.23HE damage / grenade

7.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.4424% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	0.00	23%	17 Sept →
ancient	5–13	0.07	55%	16 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.02	34%	15 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.04	27%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.14	36%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	42%	14 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.02	35%	13 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	29%	12 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	25%	12 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.03	46%	12 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	26%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.05	46%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	43%	11 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	38%	11 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.11	24%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	35%	10 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.02	43%	10 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.04	41%	9 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.02	47%	7 Sept →
inferno	15–15	0.06	41%	7 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.01	41%	7 Sept →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	29%	7 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.01	42%	6 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	45%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.04	30%	6 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.04	36%	6 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.06	31%	6 Sept →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	44%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.12	39%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.04	26%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.02	50%	6 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	13%	5 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.00	19%	4 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.02	31%	3 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	22%	3 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	31%	1 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.05	26%	1 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	38%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.08	20%	24 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.06	24%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.01	34%	22 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.02	38%	22 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	36%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.12	33%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	31%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	38%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.07	50%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	39%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	35%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	21%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.10	35%	16 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.02	36%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.16	33%	13 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	30%	12 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.06	44%	12 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	42%	12 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	39%	12 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.04	22%	11 Aug →
inferno	16–12	-0.01	50%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.07	22%	9 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.02	34%	9 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	35%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	26%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	41%	8 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	31%	8 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.01	31%	8 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.06	41%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	39%	8 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.03	26%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	8%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.05	23%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	42%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	24%	2 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	29%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	35%	2 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	30%	2 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.11	29%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.09	34%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	30%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	33%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	25%	1 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.11	33%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	41%	1 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	41%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	30%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	49%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.14	41%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	25%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	33%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	15%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.06	41%	28 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.02	27%	28 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.03	31%	27 Jul →