qq.

qq. — CS2 Stats

76561198272387753[U:1:312122025]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,443Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,793Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,766Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#77756 of 221126 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Aug 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 16 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,766 -3,899 16 Jan9 Aug · 15 days played
18,77623,665peak 23,66516 Jan9 Aug
23,665Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,009Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-01-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,009
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 491 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,899 below peak (23,665)
  • -1,837 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 234 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches20
Win rate0%
K/D0.88
Headshot %57%

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=34,112), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate52.7%44.3%47.0%above
Shot accuracy16.1%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.821.031.080.26 short
Match win rate49.2%45.2%46.7%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGqq.PREMIER19,766 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,009csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning70
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT43543Last 10043%Win rateLLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.6
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time603ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 3 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 3 May
430msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · anubis, 22 Jan
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.02
ancientB168850%0.03
cacheD1551033%0.01
dust2D1541127%0.01
anubisA148657%0.03
nukeB84450%0.03
inferno21150%0.02
overpass21150%-0.01
vertigo1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,571Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
4,857Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Purple band
52.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
11,410MVPs
5,392Hours (in match)
5,028Bombs planted
1,654Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4761,256
AWP20,987
Knife2,973
P2502,610
FAMAS2,157
MAC-102,150

Lifetime map wins

5,710inferno
4,116dust2
3,075nuke
2,255vertigo
2,205train
1,978cbble
170office
108dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,074Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
88.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10147%1.1217.8
Ancient4854%1.1218.1
Dust24243%1.0715.8
Nuke3241%1.1917.2
Anubis3148%1.1718.6
Inferno1681%1.3119.0
Overpass1258%1.5119.7
Cache475%0.9015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
604msReaction time
46.7%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
6.61HE damage / grenade
3.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.515 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.1023%9 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0619%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0916%9 Aug
anubis5–130.0227%9 Aug
mirage16–140.0621%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0415%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0317%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0920%5 Aug
anubis13–40.0516%1 Aug
mirage13–10.0421%1 Aug
nuke3–130.0115%1 Aug
anubis6–130.0829%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0527%1 Aug
cache13–7-0.0129%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0423%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0133%1 Aug
ancient8–130.0327%1 Aug
cache13–160.0411%31 Jul
anubis7–130.0216%31 Jul
cache9–130.0335%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0230%31 Jul
ancient4–130.0841%31 Jul
cache5–13-0.059%31 Jul
cache8–130.0224%31 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0221%30 Jul
cache4–130.0223%30 Jul
nuke15–150.0216%30 Jul
dust215–150.0324%30 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0118%30 Jul
mirage16–130.0629%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0121%30 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0320%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0223%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0025%29 Jul
cache8–13-0.0124%29 Jul
mirage9–130.0121%29 Jul
ancient10–130.0324%28 Jul
cache10–130.0019%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0528%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0113%28 Jul
cache13–50.0625%28 Jul
ancient13–40.0625%28 Jul
ancient13–20.0610%27 Jul
ancient6–130.1338%27 Jul
mirage13–70.1033%27 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0121%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0213%27 Jul
cache2–13-0.0533%27 Jul
cache13–100.0924%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0323%23 Jul
nuke13–50.0225%23 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0926%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0624%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0324%9 Jun
dust210–13-0.0223%4 May
inferno3–60.0728%4 May
cache13–30.1643%3 May
dust216–140.0324%2 May
dust27–13-0.0623%2 May
ancient13–10-0.0223%24 Apr
dust24–130.0327%24 Apr
nuke13–70.1533%7 Apr
anubis13–60.0318%7 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0227%6 Apr
dust211–13-0.0116%6 Apr
mirage13–90.0732%6 Apr
dust213–90.0837%6 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0323%30 Mar
nuke16–120.0423%12 Mar
mirage14–160.0336%3 Mar
mirage12–120.0431%18 Feb
vertigo7–130.0133%18 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0132%15 Feb
anubis13–50.0823%8 Feb
mirage13–100.0423%8 Feb
ancient13–100.1026%6 Feb
dust29–13-0.0129%6 Feb
mirage9–130.0116%6 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0416%29 Jan
dust27–130.0216%28 Jan
dust213–40.0320%28 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0121%28 Jan
dust24–13-0.0315%24 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0112%23 Jan
anubis11–130.0416%23 Jan
nuke13–110.0622%23 Jan
ancient13–70.0414%23 Jan
overpass13–40.0232%23 Jan
ancient4–13-0.068%23 Jan
anubis13–30.0012%23 Jan
dust29–13-0.0316%23 Jan
mirage16–140.0622%23 Jan
anubis7–130.0310%22 Jan
anubis16–140.0927%22 Jan
mirage13–60.0524%22 Jan
anubis22–200.0524%21 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0418%19 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0313%17 Jan
ancient10–130.0019%17 Jan
dust213–110.1032%16 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →