✪ Dahl

✪ Dahl — CS2 Stats

NO76561198271975931[U:1:311710203]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,035Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,111Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 1,035
−7.1ppWin rate · 50.0% → 42.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,849 -3,434 23 Dec – 14 Jun · 7 days played
13,44417,283peak 17,28323 Dec14 Jun
17,283Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2025-12-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.9%43.8%44.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy14.0%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.021.030.10 short
Match win rate45.9%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ DahlFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning46
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateLLLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time618ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.45Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 6 Jun →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 6 Jan →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 10 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 22 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%0.00
infernoD175–1229%-0.02
ancientB136–746%0.00
overpassD103–730%0.00
nukeD92–722%-0.01
dust2A85–363%0.00
anubisC73–443%0.00
cacheS54–180%0.01
train—31–233%0.02
vertigo—21–150%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.04
stronghold—10–10%-0.11
alpine—11–0100%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,834Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,812Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
39.9%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,829MVPs
1,111Hours (in match)
1,456Bombs planted
570Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,480dust2
3,227inferno
886nuke
707vertigo
323train
138cbble
50office
32lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
46%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
77.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%1.0917.5
Nuke1100%0.8815.0
Train1100%1.0813.0
Inferno10%1.0617.0
Dust210%0.4310.0
Vertigo10%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
622msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
11.40HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0020%24 Oct →
anubis6–130.0513%16 Oct →
mirage5–130.0418%14 Oct →
nuke13–100.0512%14 Oct →
mirage13–20.0840%10 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0415%10 Sept →
nuke5–130.0217%5 Aug →
cache13–100.0111%23 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0224%23 Jul →
ancient8–130.0219%17 Jul →
inferno13–100.0319%14 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.0919%13 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0015%13 Jun →
inferno0–9-0.290%13 Jun →
nuke3–9-0.1521%13 Jun →
vertigo2–9-0.0527%6 Jun →
inferno1–9-0.1313%6 Jun →
inferno9–00.4530%6 Jun →
inferno1–9-0.1319%6 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0114%5 Jun →
ancient13–90.0412%5 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0714%27 May →
mirage13–110.007%27 May →
nuke6–13-0.0616%24 May →
mirage9–13-0.0014%24 May →
anubis4–13-0.0425%23 May →
overpass1–13-0.087%23 May →
ancient13–40.1310%23 May →
overpass13–90.0712%23 May →
cache13–9-0.0415%22 May →
anubis13–10.0618%22 May →
overpass8–13-0.0224%22 May →
mirage10–13-0.0412%22 May →
dust28–13-0.1015%17 May →
inferno10–13-0.0225%17 May →
mirage12–120.0915%17 May →
dust213–8-0.0327%14 May →
train12–120.0538%13 May →
dust213–70.0524%13 May →
cache13–100.059%13 May →
inferno9–13-0.0324%13 May →
ancient13–50.0326%11 May →
overpass3–13-0.0514%11 May →
mirage13–50.0331%3 May →
ancient16–140.0319%2 May →
cache13–40.0518%2 May →
cache11–13-0.0415%29 Apr →
mirage4–130.0734%28 Apr →
mirage13–90.0211%22 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0622%22 Apr →
dust213–110.0514%22 Apr →
overpass7–130.0427%10 Apr →
overpass3–13-0.100%6 Apr →
office3–13-0.0415%6 Apr →
dust213–70.0625%6 Apr →
vertigo13–90.026%4 Apr →
mirage13–110.0213%4 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0519%2 Apr →
mirage11–130.0318%2 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0316%2 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0419%2 Apr →
dust26–130.0227%1 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0513%1 Apr →
inferno13–40.1030%1 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0217%20 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0826%19 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0019%14 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0318%14 Mar →
overpass13–90.1211%14 Mar →
anubis8–130.0014%13 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.0612%12 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0517%12 Mar →
stronghold5–13-0.1124%11 Mar →
alpine13–5-0.1311%11 Mar →
ancient4–130.0119%10 Mar →
inferno16–140.0116%5 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.037%5 Mar →
nuke9–130.0723%31 Jan →
mirage13–110.0523%29 Jan →
anubis13–9-0.0313%25 Jan →
overpass10–13-0.0223%25 Jan →
anubis13–2-0.0117%25 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0016%24 Jan →
nuke13–30.0722%18 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0714%18 Jan →
overpass13–30.1119%18 Jan →
nuke15–15-0.0216%18 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0331%18 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0620%14 Jan →
mirage8–130.0319%9 Jan →
train6–130.0430%9 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0720%6 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0253%6 Jan →
nuke4–13-0.0529%6 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0423%5 Jan →
inferno13–5-0.0226%5 Jan →
train13–4-0.0321%5 Jan →
mirage13–50.0617%29 Dec →
nuke10–130.0116%29 Dec →
ancient16–120.0213%23 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.