Lasse Med Hatten

Lasse Med Hatten — CS2 Stats

KE76561198271777760[U:1:311512032]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,585Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
866Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,321 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,585 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,286 +3,921 13 Feb – 3 Sept · 29 days played
13,18918,418peak 18,41813 Feb3 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,321 +0 3 Sept – 23 Oct · 8 observations
1,3211,321peak 1,3213 Sept23 Oct
18,840Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,321Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-02-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,321
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 24 Sep 2026 and 26 Oct 2026.

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate42.6%43.8%44.8%2.2% short
Shot accuracy9.7%12.0%12.4%2.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.021.030.12 short
Match win rate41.6%44.7%45.2%3.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLasse Med HattenFACEITLevel 5 · 1,321 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,321csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning51
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLWTTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 14–4–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time593ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 18 Feb →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 25 Apr →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 28 Mar →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W4Current streak
15–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 48% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2110–1148%-0.01
infernoA1811–761%0.03
mirageB179–853%-0.02
ancientB158–753%-0.01
dust2B105–550%-0.00
overpassB84–450%-0.01
anubisS86–275%0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.02
cache—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,627Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,857Matches
41.6%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
7,311MVPs
866Hours (in match)
2,551Bombs planted
513Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,764
AWP4,349
MP91,164
SSG 081,099
Knife982
P250929

Lifetime map wins

5,172inferno
2,597dust2
2,328nuke
1,559vertigo
1,052cbble
255train
212lake
39office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

557Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
79.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14448%1.0816.1
Dust29242%0.9615.4
Nuke6554%1.0115.6
Inferno5867%1.1415.2
Ancient5652%1.0414.9
Anubis4344%0.9514.5
Vertigo1060%1.1117.4
Train50%0.8416.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
588msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
10.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7608% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0126%5 Sept →
inferno16–140.0031%5 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0135%30 Apr →
mirage13–50.0016%26 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0218%26 Apr →
inferno13–40.0326%26 Apr →
nuke15–15-0.0021%25 Apr →
ancient15–150.0423%25 Apr →
dust29–13-0.018%25 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0711%25 Apr →
overpass13–110.0129%25 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0736%25 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.0312%25 Apr →
ancient13–100.0818%24 Apr →
ancient13–110.0232%24 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0325%24 Apr →
dust216–140.0618%24 Apr →
nuke13–100.0335%24 Apr →
anubis13–70.0425%24 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0429%24 Apr →
dust216–12-0.0117%23 Apr →
overpass13–110.0521%23 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0231%23 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0214%23 Apr →
inferno13–30.0224%22 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.097%22 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0614%20 Apr →
mirage13–80.0025%18 Apr →
inferno13–100.0523%9 Apr →
nuke2–130.0216%9 Apr →
dust29–130.0422%9 Apr →
inferno13–60.1128%9 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0317%8 Apr →
mirage16–140.0524%8 Apr →
inferno7–9-0.0014%8 Apr →
inferno9–60.048%8 Apr →
anubis13–50.1921%7 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0818%6 Apr →
nuke13–110.0118%6 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0113%4 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0215%4 Apr →
inferno13–40.0212%2 Apr →
mirage14–160.0421%2 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.029%31 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0015%30 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0324%30 Mar →
nuke7–130.025%29 Mar →
inferno6–130.0718%29 Mar →
nuke13–00.0311%28 Mar →
ancient13–80.0320%28 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.024%28 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0723%27 Mar →
mirage13–90.0433%24 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0118%24 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0619%23 Mar →
ancient13–110.0216%15 Mar →
dust27–130.0113%15 Mar →
anubis13–11-0.0618%13 Mar →
mirage13–90.0514%12 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0712%9 Mar →
vertigo1–5-0.0333%6 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.088%6 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.057%28 Feb →
nuke2–13-0.0719%27 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0830%27 Feb →
overpass10–130.0520%25 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.1115%24 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0917%24 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0117%24 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0816%23 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0415%23 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0810%23 Feb →
nuke16–140.0517%23 Feb →
inferno13–00.0518%23 Feb →
nuke13–80.0316%23 Feb →
dust213–70.0115%23 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0118%23 Feb →
anubis13–60.0129%23 Feb →
nuke13–30.0618%23 Feb →
ancient8–130.0115%23 Feb →
inferno13–110.0320%22 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0318%21 Feb →
mirage6–130.0520%21 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0318%21 Feb →
mirage13–60.0017%18 Feb →
inferno9–30.2919%18 Feb →
vertigo3–9-0.013%18 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0710%15 Feb →
overpass9–13-0.0212%15 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0320%15 Feb →
mirage16–12-0.048%15 Feb →
overpass13–4-0.0527%15 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0415%15 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0014%15 Feb →
dust215–150.0222%14 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0022%14 Feb →
nuke13–110.0212%13 Feb →
nuke13–30.0619%13 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0526%13 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0521%13 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.