ikaryu

ikaryu — CS2 Stats

DK76561198191990817[U:1:231725089]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,269Tracked matches70%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,339Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,400 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,400 → 1,400
+42Tracked matches · now 2,269
+20.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 70.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 20 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,829 -2,006 20 Feb20 Jun · 22 days played
25,45927,835peak 27,83520 Feb20 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,400 +0 1 Sept2 Sept · 2 observations
1,4001,400peak 1,4001 Sept2 Sept
28,128Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,400Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-02-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,400
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches20
Win rate70%
K/D0.70
Headshot %56%

Measured 11 Sep 202619 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,167), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.7%48.3%51.0%meets
Shot accuracy6.2%13.2%13.7%7.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.821.071.090.26 short
Match win rate46.8%46.9%48.4%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGikaryuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,400 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,400csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning44
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51472Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.8pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 100 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 1541 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time596ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 26 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 14 May
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 29 Mar
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
W12Current streak
158In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21101148%-0.03
infernoB168850%-0.02
ancientB168850%-0.04
nukeA159660%-0.04
anubisA95456%-0.03
vertigoS75271%0.01
dust2D51420%-0.05
overpassA53260%-0.01
poseidon2020%-0.08
cache21150%-0.00
eldorado110100%-0.07
debris1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,195Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
2,666Matches
46.8%Match win rate
50.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6.2%Shot accuracy
5,014MVPs
1,317Hours (in match)
2,244Bombs planted
524Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,697
AWP3,688
MP91,223
Knife683

Lifetime map wins

3,952inferno
3,201nuke
2,958dust2
1,433vertigo
236train
120lake
35office
35cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

758Matches
53%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
75.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18659%1.1015.7
Dust210941%1.0916.4
Nuke9059%1.1216.3
Inferno8361%1.1014.2
Ancient8250%1.1216.2
Anubis6452%0.9613.7
Vertigo1573%0.8912.7
Train1030%0.8013.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
561msReaction time
20.9%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
6.60HE damage / grenade
12.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4994 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.8764% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–8-0.0825%17 Sept
nuke13–30.0423%12 Sept
anubis13–50.0434%12 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0336%10 Sept
anubis16–13-0.0129%6 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0423%5 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0613%5 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0712%4 Sept
mirage22–20-0.0518%1 Sept
vertigo16–14-0.0817%31 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0318%24 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0123%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.0410%16 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0614%14 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1415%14 Aug
vertigo9–10.2113%14 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0515%1 Aug
mirage13–60.0110%1 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1123%30 Jul
poseidon6–9-0.1533%30 Jul
nuke7–9-0.1015%30 Jul
vertigo9–00.1850%30 Jul
eldorado9–5-0.0717%30 Jul
debris6–9-0.1122%30 Jul
inferno9–40.0217%30 Jul
vertigo8–8-0.0613%30 Jul
overpass9–7-0.0524%30 Jul
mirage9–130.0721%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0519%26 Jul
inferno9–30.2421%26 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0610%20 Jun
ancient8–130.0213%14 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0711%14 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0511%6 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0811%6 Jun
vertigo13–100.0312%16 May
overpass13–60.0714%16 May
cache10–13-0.1011%14 May
mirage0–13-0.06100%14 May
nuke13–6-0.0623%14 May
ancient19–17-0.0114%13 May
ancient7–13-0.0920%10 May
mirage13–70.0221%9 May
nuke11–13-0.0611%3 May
dust27–13-0.0533%3 May
cache13–40.0931%30 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0115%25 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0621%25 Apr
dust213–7-0.0430%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.048%18 Apr
inferno7–9-0.0115%8 Apr
inferno9–60.0324%8 Apr
dust213–16-0.0910%2 Apr
mirage14–160.0413%2 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0413%30 Mar
ancient13–80.0613%30 Mar
inferno3–13-0.129%29 Mar
mirage7–0-0.060%29 Mar
nuke13–00.000%28 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0210%28 Mar
nuke10–13-0.089%28 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0627%26 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0510%26 Mar
mirage13–00.0110%25 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0412%25 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0115%23 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0215%15 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0229%13 Mar
nuke2–00.000%12 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0031%12 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0331%9 Mar
nuke13–0-0.1311%8 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0219%7 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0420%7 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0515%7 Mar
nuke16–12-0.059%7 Mar
mirage1–90.0053%7 Mar
vertigo1–5-0.100%6 Mar
ancient2–13-0.110%6 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0613%6 Mar
mirage13–11-0.057%6 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0215%28 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0614%27 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0021%27 Feb
ancient4–13-0.129%25 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0620%24 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0331%24 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0214%24 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0720%23 Feb
ancient4–13-0.058%23 Feb
nuke13–60.0617%22 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0617%22 Feb
inferno9–40.1514%22 Feb
poseidon7–9-0.0021%22 Feb
inferno7–9-0.119%22 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0319%21 Feb
mirage6–13-0.048%21 Feb
ancient13–11-0.046%21 Feb
nuke13–110.0222%20 Feb
ancient12–16-0.0411%20 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →