Watson

Watson — CS2 Stats

PL76561198271282800[U:1:311017072]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,705Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,488Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,183Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12635 of 261544 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−485Premier CS Rating · 26,668 → 26,183

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,183 -189 30 Aug – 14 Nov · 48 days played
23,12327,820peak 27,82030 Aug14 Nov
27,820Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,637 below peak (27,820)
  • +1,183 over 30 days · improving
  • -189 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,817 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.2%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy13.5%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.521.071.09above
Match win rate51.2%46.9%48.4%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWatsonFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,183 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning50
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.0
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time503ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 464ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 20 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 20 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 24 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 13 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%0.02
cacheB209–1145%0.03
dust2A2011–955%0.01
ancientB158–753%0.03
infernoS96–367%0.02
anubisA85–363%0.02
nuke—42–250%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

137,925Lifetime kills
1.52K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
7,491Matches
51.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
53.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15,869MVPs
2,170Hours (in match)
7,928Bombs planted
1,693Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,942
AWP8,536
MP93,324
MAC-103,270
FAMAS3,239

Lifetime map wins

5,706vertigo
4,365dust2
4,202inferno
3,074nuke
2,941train
731stmarc
560cbble
200office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

484Matches
55%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
93.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1457%1.6718.1
Dust2862%1.8116.9
Cache683%1.8324.7
Nuke560%1.8321.6
Anubis450%1.4513.8
Ancient1100%2.5718.0
Inferno1100%1.2018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.6%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
500msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
33.3%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.09HE damage / grenade
18.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.2525% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0314%14 Nov →
ancient3–130.0511%14 Nov →
anubis13–50.0114%13 Nov →
cache13–10.0111%13 Nov →
ancient7–130.0419%13 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.017%13 Nov →
inferno16–130.0418%13 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.057%12 Nov →
cache4–13-0.0923%12 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0613%11 Nov →
anubis13–3-0.0121%11 Nov →
ancient14–160.0810%11 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0122%10 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0716%10 Nov →
nuke1–13-0.0621%10 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0121%8 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0215%8 Nov →
cache10–130.0820%6 Nov →
ancient13–20.1017%6 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0515%6 Nov →
mirage16–120.0916%3 Nov →
cache13–100.0519%2 Nov →
ancient4–130.0132%1 Nov →
mirage13–80.0420%1 Nov →
ancient13–50.0615%1 Nov →
cache10–130.0218%1 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.024%31 Oct →
inferno7–130.0313%31 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0425%31 Oct →
dust216–120.0212%28 Oct →
cache13–90.078%28 Oct →
mirage4–130.0713%26 Oct →
dust213–30.0914%25 Oct →
ancient13–100.0817%24 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0117%24 Oct →
inferno13–10.0318%24 Oct →
cache7–130.0619%23 Oct →
anubis13–80.0415%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0117%22 Oct →
ancient16–130.0014%22 Oct →
dust26–130.0215%21 Oct →
dust213–20.0222%20 Oct →
mirage13–40.1013%19 Oct →
cache13–90.0216%17 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0016%17 Oct →
cache5–130.039%17 Oct →
cache13–70.057%16 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0213%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0320%15 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.009%14 Oct →
dust213–90.0315%14 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0120%13 Oct →
mirage4–130.0115%13 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0012%11 Oct →
mirage5–130.0414%10 Oct →
inferno13–90.0221%10 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0016%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.029%10 Oct →
dust25–130.015%10 Oct →
nuke11–130.0412%8 Oct →
anubis6–130.0321%8 Oct →
dust215–150.0117%8 Oct →
cache13–160.0518%7 Oct →
anubis9–130.0410%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0411%30 Sept →
cache9–13-0.042%30 Sept →
cache11–130.0117%25 Sept →
vertigo9–10.0435%24 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0121%24 Sept →
dust213–60.0117%23 Sept →
cache13–30.0638%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.1929%20 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0319%20 Sept →
cache13–100.0126%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0519%19 Sept →
mirage13–100.000%19 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.030%19 Sept →
ancient13–50.0813%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.0320%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0318%18 Sept →
dust20–5-0.040%15 Sept →
mirage5–110.0517%14 Sept →
dust213–80.0614%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0516%13 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0211%13 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0119%13 Sept →
ancient13–30.000%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0323%12 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0521%12 Sept →
mirage7–130.0513%10 Sept →
dust210–130.0721%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.0615%5 Sept →
cache13–110.0915%4 Sept →
mirage3–130.0314%4 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0611%3 Sept →
anubis13–90.0612%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0414%31 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0221%30 Aug →
cache13–70.0619%30 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0524%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.