MgN0xX

MgN0xX — CS2 Stats

76561198268989888[U:1:308724160]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,091Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,262Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,697 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,697 → 2,697
+48Tracked matches · now 4,091
−6.7ppWin rate · 56.7% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 24 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,814 +256 8 Jun24 Jun · 4 days played
24,55824,936peak 24,9368 Jun24 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,697 +0 30 Aug2 Sept · 3 observations
2,6972,697peak 2,69730 Aug2 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,697Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-04-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,697
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 303 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches928−19
Win rate44%64%−20pp
K/D0.781.21−0.43
Headshot %62%58%+5pp

Measured 18 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 9 Sep 2026 → 18 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=28,192), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate50.2%51.0%
Shot accuracy11.7%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.241.09
Match win rate51.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMgN0xXFACEITLevel 10 · 2,697 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,697csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning73
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.7pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility5.2
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning7.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time475ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 475ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−5.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 24 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · nuke, 17 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · anubis, 3 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 2 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA30181260%0.04
anubisA1912763%0.05
mirageD134931%0.03
ancientS129375%0.06
infernoC125742%0.05
overpassD62433%0.02
cache41325%0.01
dust221150%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.05
train1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

157,931Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
7,963Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
50.2%Headshot %
11.7%Shot accuracy
28,122MVPs
3,045Hours (in match)
8,418Bombs planted
2,777Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,106
AWP14,623
Knife4,568
MAC-102,886
SSG 082,688

Lifetime map wins

9,843inferno
9,722nuke
4,912vertigo
3,625dust2
2,117cbble
1,573train
551lake
197safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,636Matches
52%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
92.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient52547%1.2519.1
Nuke48760%1.3820.0
Anubis44252%1.3019.5
Mirage27545%1.1418.5
Inferno23646%1.2218.4
Overpass16261%1.4919.7
Vertigo15959%1.3218.8
Train9751%1.4121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.1%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
465msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
63.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.94HE damage / grenade
6.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9597% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–20.1350%17 Sept
nuke4–9-0.0219%17 Sept
nuke2–9-0.0225%17 Sept
ancient19–150.0327%13 Sept
anubis13–60.1324%7 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0413%3 Sept
mirage12–160.0119%3 Sept
nuke7–130.0119%1 Sept
anubis4–130.0126%1 Sept
vertigo13–110.0525%1 Sept
cache7–13-0.0418%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0317%30 Aug
nuke5–130.0022%29 Aug
nuke13–90.0721%28 Aug
cache5–130.0316%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0216%26 Aug
nuke13–90.0821%24 Aug
ancient11–130.0122%24 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0231%20 Aug
anubis13–90.0415%19 Aug
mirage13–70.1538%19 Aug
inferno13–60.0426%19 Aug
nuke10–130.0624%19 Aug
nuke16–120.0425%18 Aug
anubis9–130.0319%17 Aug
nuke7–130.0324%17 Aug
ancient13–80.0828%17 Aug
inferno16–140.0228%17 Aug
inferno10–130.0419%7 Aug
anubis4–130.0219%7 Aug
cache14–160.0119%6 Aug
nuke13–100.0429%5 Aug
mirage16–130.0422%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0728%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0913%4 Aug
anubis16–130.0833%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0536%3 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0315%3 Aug
anubis13–100.0725%1 Aug
anubis7–130.0417%1 Aug
nuke13–100.0531%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0434%31 Jul
anubis13–80.0127%30 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0218%29 Jul
anubis13–40.2427%24 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0113%22 Jul
ancient13–50.0321%20 Jul
nuke13–80.0435%15 Jul
anubis13–80.0425%10 Jul
ancient13–110.0015%8 Jul
nuke19–160.0417%5 Jul
inferno13–160.0420%3 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0224%3 Jul
inferno13–20.1222%3 Jul
ancient13–10.0225%2 Jul
nuke13–70.1025%30 Jun
train7–130.0726%30 Jun
cache13–90.0423%25 Jun
inferno10–130.1027%25 Jun
overpass13–70.1724%24 Jun
ancient6–130.1130%24 Jun
inferno13–70.1324%24 Jun
ancient13–10.2436%24 Jun
nuke13–40.1420%24 Jun
overpass13–160.0923%24 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0121%24 Jun
mirage10–130.0330%21 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0029%21 Jun
nuke13–50.0522%17 Jun
nuke2–130.0050%17 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0337%17 Jun
nuke6–130.0340%17 Jun
nuke13–100.0523%17 Jun
nuke13–80.1220%17 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0330%10 Jun
overpass13–30.1033%10 Jun
ancient16–140.0839%8 Jun
nuke13–100.0134%8 Jun
mirage11–130.0918%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0519%6 Jun
ancient13–30.1234%4 Jun
nuke9–130.0624%3 Jun
anubis13–110.0217%2 Jun
dust22–13-0.0316%29 May
overpass12–160.0016%28 May
anubis13–110.0420%28 May
inferno6–9-0.0146%24 May
nuke13–80.0328%20 May
mirage9–130.0930%17 May
inferno13–40.1131%17 May
dust213–110.0240%4 May
ancient13–80.0017%3 May
mirage11–130.0340%29 Apr
anubis13–110.1032%28 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0525%28 Apr
nuke9–60.0620%25 Apr
nuke8–130.0122%25 Apr
overpass12–16-0.0520%25 Apr
anubis10–130.0623%24 Apr
overpass0–9-0.2043%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →