PiwnyCzarodziej

PiwnyCzarodziej — CS2 Stats

PL76561198268187622[U:1:307921894]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,091Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,789Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+27Tracked matches · now 1,091
+3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 63.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,337 -416 19 Jan – 5 Jul · 13 days played
14,29919,753peak 19,75319 Jan5 Jul
20,753Peak Premier in tracked matches
55Days played since 2026-01-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate68.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy6.6%13.0%13.2%6.6% short
Kill/death ratio2.011.061.07above
Match win rate44.5%46.3%46.9%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPiwnyCzarodziejFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning59
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.9
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time533ms−101ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 2 Feb →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 31 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · nuke, 11 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 5 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3421–1362%0.03
nukeA1610–663%0.01
anubisD155–1033%-0.00
dust2C146–843%0.00
ancientS108–280%0.00
overpass—42–250%-0.01
vertigo—30–30%-0.02
cache—21–150%-0.04
inferno—20–20%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

161,627Lifetime kills
2.01K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
3,651Matches
44.5%Match win rate
68.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players
6.6%Shot accuracy
11,984MVPs
1,423Hours (in match)
2,856Bombs planted
1,378Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4795,138
AWP6,112
FAMAS3,440
MP92,085
SSG 081,501

Lifetime map wins

4,030dust2
1,697nuke
1,517inferno
749train
700vertigo
443cbble
92office
79lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

509Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
83.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18252%1.2217.1
Anubis9249%1.1416.4
Dust26652%1.0715.8
Nuke6253%1.0616.0
Ancient5756%1.0716.0
Cache2241%0.9815.2
Inferno1926%1.1218.0
Train3100%1.2718.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
517msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
10.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4786 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9577% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.0520%4 Nov →
nuke16–140.0518%29 Oct →
mirage16–120.0120%25 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0616%20 Oct →
ancient13–70.0314%20 Oct →
anubis13–10.1015%20 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0514%4 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0021%29 Sept →
mirage13–80.1235%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0917%21 Sept →
mirage16–130.088%21 Sept →
mirage8–130.0414%13 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0219%11 Sept →
mirage18–22-0.0416%7 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0021%5 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0015%4 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0714%3 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0716%3 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0238%31 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0219%20 Aug →
mirage13–80.0318%20 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.028%20 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0121%20 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0213%17 Aug →
cache1–13-0.1126%16 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0313%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0312%12 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0115%10 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0522%6 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0221%31 Jul →
cache13–110.0225%27 Jul →
anubis13–40.0815%27 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.1112%26 Jul →
vertigo6–90.0426%24 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.076%17 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0915%14 Jul →
mirage13–90.0112%11 Jul →
overpass13–90.0317%5 Jul →
anubis11–130.0419%5 Jul →
nuke13–20.0412%5 Jul →
dust213–00.0421%5 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0122%5 Jul →
mirage9–130.0314%5 Jul →
mirage13–110.0617%5 Jul →
ancient13–90.0314%5 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0012%4 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0420%4 Jul →
vertigo6–90.0420%3 Jul →
mirage13–60.0232%2 Jul →
ancient13–90.0316%1 Jul →
mirage13–20.0613%1 Jul →
dust214–160.0319%1 Jul →
mirage16–130.0525%1 Jul →
dust213–70.0224%22 May →
mirage13–110.0519%22 May →
overpass15–150.0028%29 Mar →
mirage4–130.0220%28 Mar →
mirage13–80.0935%28 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0425%9 Mar →
dust216–140.0322%9 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.057%9 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0712%2 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0118%2 Mar →
nuke13–60.0317%2 Mar →
dust213–100.0825%1 Mar →
dust213–110.0115%23 Feb →
nuke13–40.1822%23 Feb →
anubis10–130.0213%22 Feb →
dust213–16-0.0317%20 Feb →
nuke6–130.0117%20 Feb →
mirage5–130.0128%7 Feb →
mirage13–60.0819%6 Feb →
ancient13–100.0121%6 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0416%6 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0622%5 Feb →
nuke13–70.0833%4 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.027%4 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0623%4 Feb →
mirage13–20.2020%2 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0027%30 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0216%29 Jan →
mirage16–14-0.0115%29 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0020%29 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0330%29 Jan →
mirage5–130.1012%29 Jan →
mirage11–130.0519%28 Jan →
mirage10–130.0122%27 Jan →
mirage10–130.0824%27 Jan →
dust22–130.0422%26 Jan →
mirage13–30.1628%26 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.0214%26 Jan →
anubis7–90.0217%26 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0828%26 Jan →
nuke10–130.0110%26 Jan →
nuke8–130.0116%26 Jan →
anubis13–110.0119%22 Jan →
vertigo1–9-0.1418%21 Jan →
overpass2–7-0.1117%19 Jan →
overpass13–50.029%19 Jan →
nuke13–20.0124%19 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.