Nezuko Kamado

Nezuko Kamado — CS2 Stats

DE76561198254824089[U:1:294558361]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,117Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,443Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,221Purple band · top ~19.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,221 +2,915 11 Jul – 27 Sept · 21 days played
14,30619,133peak 19,13311 Jul27 Sept
19,133Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-07-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,912 below peak (19,133)
  • -1,034 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,915 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,779 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches10——
Win rate60%——
K/D0.98——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches49——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.12——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,636), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate46.6%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy15.0%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.03above
Match win rate64.9%44.7%45.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNezuko KamadoFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,221 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning58
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time544ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 10 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 19 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 4 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 19 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 31anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3121–1068%-0.01
infernoS1812–667%0.02
cacheC176–1135%0.01
ancientB157–847%0.01
anubisD102–820%-0.03
nukeD62–433%-0.01
mirage—22–0100%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

162,916Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13,763Matches
64.9%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
46.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14,178MVPs
3,078Hours (in match)
9,083Bombs planted
1,902Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,019
AWP18,816
FAMAS3,754
P902,829

Lifetime map wins

27,546dust2
8,144inferno
4,851nuke
1,940cbble
780vertigo
761train
596office
343italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

225Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2458%1.2616.3
Dust22462%1.0315.1
Anubis1650%1.1215.9
Ancient1331%1.2719.1
Mirage825%0.9714.4
Nuke450%0.9716.0
Cache450%1.3817.5
Vertigo2100%1.7322.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
548msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
10.23HE damage / grenade
3.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3441 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2307% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0019%27 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.1112%27 Sept →
cache9–130.0520%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.0212%26 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0321%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0618%20 Sept →
cache9–130.0121%19 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0626%19 Sept →
nuke8–130.0227%19 Sept →
inferno9–130.0114%18 Sept →
ancient15–150.0210%18 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0129%13 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0324%13 Sept →
mirage13–90.0127%13 Sept →
ancient13–100.0521%13 Sept →
inferno13–30.0323%13 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0624%13 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0319%13 Sept →
inferno13–100.1137%10 Sept →
cache13–90.0523%10 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.013%8 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0017%8 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0419%4 Sept →
dust213–80.0422%4 Sept →
inferno13–50.0833%4 Sept →
cache13–40.0421%4 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0622%3 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0324%3 Sept →
cache8–130.0740%3 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0123%3 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0121%3 Sept →
inferno13–110.0417%2 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0516%2 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0229%31 Aug →
cache0–130.0334%31 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0511%28 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0225%28 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0623%28 Aug →
dust213–70.0119%28 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0512%23 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0419%23 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0633%23 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0625%23 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0440%23 Aug →
inferno13–70.0823%22 Aug →
anubis4–130.0021%22 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0522%22 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0027%22 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0823%8 Aug →
ancient6–130.0214%5 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0120%5 Aug →
cache16–130.0722%4 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0516%4 Aug →
dust213–70.0118%4 Aug →
anubis13–90.0111%4 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0115%4 Aug →
dust213–40.0620%4 Aug →
ancient13–60.0628%3 Aug →
dust213–100.0731%25 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0115%25 Jul →
cache13–30.0737%25 Jul →
dust213–50.0242%19 Jul →
inferno13–20.0320%19 Jul →
dust29–130.0024%19 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0514%19 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0316%18 Jul →
cache12–160.0121%18 Jul →
nuke11–130.0322%18 Jul →
inferno13–30.1027%18 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0514%18 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0321%18 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0628%18 Jul →
inferno13–110.0119%14 Jul →
cache13–30.0234%14 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0019%14 Jul →
dust213–100.0416%14 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0315%14 Jul →
dust211–130.0723%14 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0123%14 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0216%14 Jul →
ancient13–90.0424%14 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0525%14 Jul →
inferno13–70.0026%13 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0118%13 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0218%13 Jul →
dust216–140.0124%13 Jul →
dust213–20.0233%13 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0529%13 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0312%13 Jul →
ancient9–130.0411%13 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0430%12 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0213%12 Jul →
ancient13–100.0229%12 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0326%12 Jul →
cache13–2-0.0128%12 Jul →
anubis10–130.0622%12 Jul →
ancient15–150.0024%12 Jul →
cache4–13-0.1025%12 Jul →
inferno10–130.0728%11 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0623%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.