ajumahl

ajumahl — CS2 Stats

76561198253871338[U:1:293605610]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,178Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,643Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,680Blue band · top ~35.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36797 of 57345 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 748 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,680Peak Premier on CSDB
748Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 748
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,680
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,320 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,587), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.7%43.7%44.7%3.0% short
Shot accuracy13.9%11.8%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.021.040.08 short
Match win rate40.3%45.0%45.2%5.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGajumahlFACEITLevel 5 · 748 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,680 · Blue bandPEAK ELO748csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning52
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateWWLTLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression4.4
Utility4.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch5.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time606ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–3
131Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC27121544%-0.02
ancientC2291341%-0.02
nukeC145936%-0.01
anubisS98189%-0.00
dust2B84450%-0.03
mirageB84450%-0.02
infernoB63350%-0.04
office41325%-0.02
train1010%0.04
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,064Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
5,518Matches
40.3%Match win rate
41.7%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12,112MVPs
2,028Hours (in match)
4,189Bombs planted
929Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,930
AWP15,116
FAMAS1,988
Tec-91,675
P901,605

Lifetime map wins

5,587inferno
4,858dust2
2,661nuke
2,566office
1,140train
1,108vertigo
630cbble
359lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

200Matches
52%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
66.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2045%0.8913.8
Ancient1753%0.9715.3
Nuke1464%0.8913.1
Cache1164%1.0012.7
Anubis862%0.8913.8
Inferno617%0.8713.3
Vertigo20%0.6010.5
Overpass1100%1.0014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
89.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
610msReaction time
22.6%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
4.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.6213% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0528%30 Aug
cache13–3-0.0111%27 Aug
cache8–13-0.0615%27 Aug
office12–12-0.0127%25 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0311%25 Aug
anubis13–90.0415%25 Aug
ancient11–1-0.0221%25 Aug
cache9–130.0629%25 Aug
train9–130.0422%25 Aug
cache13–8-0.0713%25 Aug
cache13–50.0413%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0226%23 Aug
dust25–13-0.0614%21 Aug
dust213–4-0.0012%21 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0422%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0416%20 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1222%20 Aug
inferno0–13-0.080%20 Aug
cache11–13-0.0329%20 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0218%20 Aug
cache7–13-0.0521%20 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0223%20 Aug
anubis13–110.0525%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0510%19 Aug
ancient10–130.0014%19 Aug
dust215–15-0.0412%18 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0912%17 Aug
dust27–130.0213%17 Aug
cache10–13-0.0318%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0313%16 Aug
nuke13–16-0.059%16 Aug
inferno13–9-0.057%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0417%16 Aug
ancient11–130.0536%16 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0213%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.089%16 Aug
cache13–11-0.018%16 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1025%16 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0125%15 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0818%14 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0517%14 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0130%14 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0619%13 Aug
ancient13–30.1319%13 Aug
dust213–10-0.0411%13 Aug
cache13–80.0432%13 Aug
cache3–13-0.0524%13 Aug
ancient13–50.0310%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0121%12 Aug
cache13–40.0320%12 Aug
cache3–13-0.0433%11 Aug
anubis13–30.1133%11 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0715%10 Aug
cache13–80.0517%9 Aug
cache15–150.0013%9 Aug
cache3–13-0.0821%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0316%8 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0511%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0523%8 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0126%7 Aug
cache9–13-0.0316%7 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0025%7 Aug
dust213–30.0215%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.058%6 Aug
nuke13–30.0219%5 Aug
anubis13–10.0110%5 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0119%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0019%5 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0115%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0031%4 Aug
anubis16–140.0117%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0115%3 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0529%3 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0214%3 Aug
cache16–13-0.0230%1 Aug
cache13–110.0221%1 Aug
office10–13-0.0613%1 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0618%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.100%31 Jul
cache4–13-0.1111%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0414%31 Jul
nuke8–130.0625%31 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0522%31 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0516%30 Jul
cache13–20.0818%30 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0524%30 Jul
ancient8–130.0125%29 Jul
cache9–13-0.0310%29 Jul
dust213–50.0019%29 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.0823%29 Jul
ancient13–11-0.029%28 Jul
mirage13–50.0313%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0424%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0516%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0513%28 Jul
cache13–4-0.0213%27 Jul
office10–13-0.0232%27 Jul
office13–10-0.0120%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0912%25 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0319%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →