NeNeNasTy

NeNeNasTy — CS2 Stats

IM76561198250839304[U:1:290573576]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,338Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,955Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,422Blue band · top ~36.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 4,338 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,422 -1,688 19 May – 14 Nov · 27 days played
10,55015,668peak 15,66819 May14 Nov
15,785Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-05-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,246 below peak (15,668)
  • +264 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,578 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate62.4%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy8.2%12.0%12.4%4.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.851.021.03above
Match win rate34.8%44.7%45.2%10.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNeNeNasTyFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,422 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning44
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time610ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 8–13 · mirage, 21 Jul →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · mirage, 22 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 25 May →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 16 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 28infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3417–1750%-0.01
dust2B2815–1354%0.00
infernoD134–931%-0.01
ancientC73–443%-0.03
anubisB63–350%-0.01
nukeB63–350%0.02
overpass—42–250%0.03
cache—21–150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

373,538Lifetime kills
1.85K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
10,612Matches
34.8%Match win rate
62.4%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
18,220MVPs
3,955Hours (in match)
6,352Bombs planted
1,719Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47199,575
AWP47,123
SG 5535,116
MAC-104,848
SSG 084,313
MP94,218

Lifetime map wins

10,754inferno
9,710dust2
3,015vertigo
2,160nuke
402train
57lake
50cbble
46office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

523Matches
52%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
74.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16052%0.9814.0
Anubis11356%0.9713.8
Inferno6148%0.8312.2
Ancient5756%0.8911.9
Vertigo4949%0.8011.8
Dust24356%1.0013.7
Nuke2236%0.7611.6
Overpass1040%0.8811.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
612msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.16HE damage / grenade
19.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4548% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4755% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0613%5 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.100%5 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0314%22 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.053%8 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0414%8 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0816%8 Aug →
dust213–70.0319%8 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0413%1 Aug →
mirage13–70.0113%1 Aug →
ancient10–130.0421%1 Aug →
dust213–100.018%1 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.018%31 Jul →
dust213–100.0627%31 Jul →
dust29–130.0010%31 Jul →
mirage10–130.0110%30 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0316%30 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0232%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0616%28 Jul →
dust216–120.0318%28 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0311%28 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0618%28 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0121%27 Jul →
nuke13–40.0217%27 Jul →
anubis13–20.0211%27 Jul →
mirage13–30.039%27 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0511%27 Jul →
mirage13–90.0625%27 Jul →
dust213–20.1012%27 Jul →
mirage13–50.0312%27 Jul →
ancient13–90.0311%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0511%26 Jul →
mirage7–130.0313%26 Jul →
nuke13–80.1212%26 Jul →
dust214–160.0017%22 Jul →
mirage13–40.1321%22 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0118%22 Jul →
mirage8–130.1520%21 Jul →
nuke13–80.008%17 Jul →
anubis6–2-0.100%17 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0214%17 Jul →
inferno15–150.0216%16 Jul →
inferno2–4-0.008%16 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.028%14 Jul →
inferno13–160.0517%14 Jul →
inferno10–130.0211%13 Jul →
inferno4–130.0121%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0115%9 Jul →
mirage13–90.0115%9 Jul →
cache5–130.0117%9 Jul →
dust26–130.1019%6 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0821%6 Jul →
dust213–80.0513%6 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0217%6 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0016%6 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.033%6 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0110%6 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.068%6 Jul →
anubis2–130.0415%6 Jul →
mirage12–160.0521%5 Jul →
mirage7–130.0215%27 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0123%27 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0616%16 Jun →
mirage13–1-0.030%16 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0417%16 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0910%14 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0321%13 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0416%11 Jun →
mirage13–10.0225%11 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0213%11 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.1211%11 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0325%11 Jun →
inferno13–70.0015%11 Jun →
overpass11–130.0419%11 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0716%11 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0212%10 Jun →
dust21–13-0.1125%10 Jun →
mirage14–160.0319%9 Jun →
dust213–100.0319%9 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0123%9 Jun →
inferno10–130.0222%6 Jun →
dust213–40.115%6 Jun →
overpass13–30.1014%6 Jun →
nuke9–130.0515%5 Jun →
mirage13–5-0.0613%5 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0521%5 Jun →
anubis15–15-0.052%5 Jun →
inferno3–130.0024%5 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0227%3 Jun →
mirage0–12-0.076%25 May →
dust213–50.0210%25 May →
dust25–13-0.0518%22 May →
mirage13–110.0534%22 May →
mirage13–60.0319%22 May →
inferno13–5-0.0219%22 May →
mirage10–13-0.0710%22 May →
mirage8–13-0.0216%21 May →
anubis8–130.0515%21 May →
overpass13–9-0.0014%21 May →
dust26–13-0.0423%20 May →
dust213–110.0110%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.