Sankko

Sankko — CS2 Stats

FI76561198250722590[U:1:290456862]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

850Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,268Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,531 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,531 → 1,531
+4Tracked matches · now 850
−3.4ppWin rate · 44.8% → 41.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 12 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,603 -1,332 12 Jan15 May · 6 days played
19,51922,755peak 22,75512 Jan15 May
Faceit ELO: 1,531 +0 1 Sept13 Sept · 3 observations
1,5311,531peak 1,5311 Sept13 Sept
22,755Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,531Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-01-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,531
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 220 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches312−9
Win rate67%58%+8pp
K/D1.171.20−0.03
Headshot %46%48%−1pp

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.5%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy18.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.061.07above
Match win rate49.6%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSankkoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,531 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,531csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning65
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46513Last 10046%Win rateWLWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.7
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.5
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time558ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 2 Mar
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · office, 7 May
414msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · office, 7 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB29141548%0.01
dust2D1951426%-0.00
anubisD112918%-0.00
nukeA116555%0.00
infernoB105550%0.00
mirageS65183%0.07
cacheS54180%0.04
office220100%0.03
overpass220100%0.10
shelter110100%0.04
train1010%0.04
poseidon1010%0.01
warden1010%0.06
golden1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,623Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3,011Matches
49.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
49.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
10,841MVPs
1,643Hours (in match)
2,872Bombs planted
973Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,501
AWP15,248
MAC-101,506
FAMAS1,476
MP91,302

Lifetime map wins

6,719inferno
4,793nuke
3,097dust2
1,636office
1,244train
706vertigo
284cbble
96lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

778Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
85.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5545%1.0917.6
Nuke4459%1.3017.6
Anubis3858%1.2418.2
Inferno3546%1.0514.9
Dust23537%1.0714.7
Mirage2040%1.3217.9
Overpass1856%1.1017.8
Cache888%1.2617.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
560msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
16.2%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
5.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0216%13 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0214%13 Sept
cache13–11-0.0119%10 Sept
nuke13–50.0638%9 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0410%8 Sept
ancient16–140.1217%8 Sept
dust25–13-0.094%8 Sept
inferno9–40.0411%4 Sept
ancient13–50.0926%3 Sept
dust29–130.0012%1 Sept
cache17–19-0.0217%16 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0316%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0824%9 Aug
dust213–16-0.0126%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0416%8 Aug
ancient8–130.0216%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.0812%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0717%8 Aug
dust218–220.0218%6 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0613%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0722%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0510%2 Aug
mirage13–40.0521%2 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0227%28 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0624%25 Jul
cache16–130.1319%25 Jul
ancient8–130.027%25 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0222%25 Jul
ancient13–160.0014%23 Jul
anubis5–130.0522%22 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0013%22 Jul
office13–80.0421%21 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0515%17 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0319%17 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0336%17 Jul
nuke13–30.0017%17 Jul
dust215–190.0118%16 Jul
inferno11–130.0013%15 Jul
shelter13–100.0420%15 Jul
dust213–60.0617%15 Jul
dust25–13-0.0814%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0527%12 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0529%12 Jul
ancient13–16-0.018%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0221%29 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0121%29 Jun
nuke13–10-0.017%29 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0110%29 Jun
train12–120.0431%20 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0927%7 Jun
dust27–13-0.0318%15 May
anubis13–3-0.0326%15 May
ancient8–130.0218%10 May
nuke13–9-0.0117%10 May
poseidon7–90.0142%10 May
warden11–130.0616%8 May
office13–00.0245%7 May
cache13–11-0.0126%7 May
cache13–80.1031%6 May
ancient16–140.0223%29 Apr
ancient13–90.0129%28 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0121%28 Apr
dust213–30.0437%26 Apr
anubis9–130.0336%25 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0917%25 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0524%25 Apr
nuke12–160.0324%12 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0015%12 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0222%2 Apr
ancient13–110.0317%29 Mar
ancient13–110.0317%29 Mar
nuke13–90.0232%23 Mar
dust28–13-0.0417%23 Mar
anubis13–20.1421%23 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0015%23 Mar
inferno13–100.026%22 Mar
ancient9–130.0424%18 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0516%15 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0113%15 Mar
ancient18–22-0.0218%14 Mar
nuke10–130.0220%4 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0025%2 Mar
mirage13–40.1926%2 Mar
ancient11–130.0218%2 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0211%2 Mar
overpass13–60.1024%1 Mar
mirage13–30.0637%1 Mar
dust213–50.0921%22 Feb
dust213–5-0.0214%18 Feb
ancient13–80.0415%16 Feb
inferno9–130.0321%15 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0311%8 Feb
dust25–13-0.0228%8 Feb
dust214–160.0327%3 Feb
dust213–110.0436%19 Jan
ancient13–60.0822%19 Jan
overpass13–70.1127%18 Jan
golden12–120.0415%16 Jan
inferno13–90.0924%16 Jan
dust211–130.049%12 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →