NekoSensei

NekoSensei — CS2 Stats

JP76561198249791126[U:1:289525398]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,689Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,994Hours in CS64Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,558Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#76645 of 261690 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+443Premier CS Rating · 20,115 → 20,558

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,558 +3,740 11 Sept – 15 Nov · 21 days played
13,62820,558peak 20,55811 Sept15 Nov
20,558Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,558
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,442 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,948), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate33.7%45.7%46.8%13.1% short
Shot accuracy10.5%12.7%13.0%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.051.060.02 short
Match win rate48.5%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNekoSenseiFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,558 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning69
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateWWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −8.6pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.4
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time560ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 10.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 30 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 13 Nov →
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 11 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 10 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 20infernoWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2015–575%0.02
infernoC187–1139%0.01
dust2B168–850%-0.00
mirageA149–564%0.01
nukeS118–373%0.02
ancientB115–645%-0.01
anubisS107–370%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,874Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
4,194Matches
48.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
33.7%Headshot %
10.5%Shot accuracy
8,718MVPs
1,780Hours (in match)
4,334Bombs planted
1,137Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,433
AWP3,593
MP73,493
MAC-102,392
MP91,726

Lifetime map wins

11,113dust2
7,528inferno
2,786nuke
685train
554cbble
370vertigo
107office
39italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

120Matches
53%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.1ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23459%0.9713.6
Mirage2152%0.9614.6
Ancient1850%1.0717.2
Nuke1560%1.0115.8
Cache944%0.9314.3
Anubis838%1.1014.5
Inferno862%1.4216.8
Overpass333%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
58.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
558msReaction time
50.9%T opening success
62.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
10.20HE damage / grenade
10.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0111%15 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0112%14 Nov →
ancient13–110.0021%14 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0312%14 Nov →
cache13–60.015%14 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0017%14 Nov →
ancient13–50.0311%14 Nov →
anubis13–100.0510%14 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0716%14 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0313%14 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0022%14 Nov →
anubis13–70.0825%14 Nov →
inferno13–50.1021%14 Nov →
mirage5–130.0120%14 Nov →
nuke13–80.0331%13 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0521%13 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0119%13 Nov →
cache6–130.0226%13 Nov →
cache9–130.0312%13 Nov →
anubis13–60.0217%13 Nov →
dust213–7-0.0312%13 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0314%13 Nov →
anubis16–130.0812%13 Nov →
inferno13–7-0.0117%13 Nov →
mirage13–20.0224%12 Nov →
cache13–100.0312%12 Nov →
mirage13–80.0211%12 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0415%11 Nov →
mirage13–16-0.018%11 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0410%11 Nov →
dust27–13-0.037%11 Nov →
dust213–110.0124%10 Nov →
cache13–10.0513%10 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0212%10 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0210%10 Nov →
nuke13–00.0417%10 Nov →
dust210–13-0.018%10 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0211%8 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0011%8 Nov →
cache13–60.0318%8 Nov →
nuke10–130.018%7 Nov →
cache13–80.0111%7 Nov →
inferno13–70.0312%7 Nov →
cache13–110.0512%7 Nov →
mirage13–20.0321%7 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0415%7 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0310%7 Nov →
cache9–1-0.020%7 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0117%7 Nov →
nuke11–1-0.034%7 Nov →
cache15–150.039%6 Nov →
ancient13–40.049%6 Nov →
cache13–7-0.016%6 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.058%6 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.036%6 Nov →
inferno2–60.0716%6 Nov →
inferno7–130.0215%6 Nov →
mirage13–70.0313%5 Nov →
mirage13–80.0711%5 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.006%5 Nov →
anubis13–80.069%4 Nov →
dust211–130.0213%4 Nov →
cache13–100.139%4 Nov →
anubis13–90.015%4 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0115%4 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.105%4 Nov →
nuke10–130.0511%3 Nov →
ancient13–50.0723%3 Nov →
cache13–50.008%3 Nov →
dust213–80.0417%3 Nov →
cache16–12-0.028%3 Nov →
inferno13–16-0.0213%3 Nov →
nuke13–60.036%3 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0714%3 Nov →
cache15–150.0312%2 Nov →
dust213–40.069%2 Nov →
inferno13–40.0512%2 Nov →
anubis13–60.063%2 Nov →
nuke7–130.058%2 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0210%2 Nov →
inferno13–70.1021%2 Nov →
cache13–80.015%2 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.029%1 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.0418%1 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0510%1 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.039%1 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.017%1 Nov →
dust213–110.0320%1 Nov →
cache13–3-0.019%1 Nov →
mirage13–50.055%30 Oct →
dust213–100.156%30 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0415%30 Oct →
cache13–110.039%30 Oct →
nuke13–100.0412%28 Oct →
ancient1–50.030%28 Oct →
inferno4–130.0114%28 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0010%27 Oct →
inferno13–50.0110%27 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0313%27 Oct →
inferno13–90.029%26 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.