Saxon

Saxon — CS2 Stats

76561198238967594[U:1:278701866]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,392Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,197Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,000Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53488 of 247880 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,558 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−826Premier CS Rating · 22,826 → 22,000

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,000 -722 10 Sept – 1 Oct · 7 days played
22,00023,106peak 23,10610 Sept1 Oct
23,332Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,558Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,558
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 193 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,106 below peak (23,106)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches139——
Win rate55%——
K/D1.74——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate35.9%46.8%48.2%12.3% short
Shot accuracy12.7%13.0%13.3%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.061.07above
Match win rate45.7%46.3%46.9%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSaxonFACEITLevel 8 · 1,558 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,558csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning78
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.1
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning7.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time521ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 512ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 16 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 25 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · train, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2312–1152%0.06
nukeC187–1139%0.03
mirageB136–746%0.04
infernoB105–550%0.04
vertigoA74–357%0.10
ancientB63–350%0.05
anubisS64–267%0.07
fachwerk—42–250%0.02
cache—31–233%0.06
shelter—21–150%0.11
overpass—21–150%-0.05
boulder—22–0100%0.07
poseidon—21–150%0.02
office—10–10%-0.01
train—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

134,192Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,233Matches
45.7%Match win rate
35.9%Headshot %
12.7%Shot accuracy
17,435MVPs
2,408Hours (in match)
5,156Bombs planted
1,727Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,925
AWP18,914
MP93,985
FAMAS3,208
MAC-102,466

Lifetime map wins

13,406inferno
8,677dust2
4,695vertigo
4,578nuke
3,212office
2,960train
1,213lake
534cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
49%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
84.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6452%1.1916.6
Mirage3951%1.0415.6
Dust23642%1.1216.4
Nuke3250%1.0615.7
Anubis2454%1.0215.1
Ancient1533%1.0415.9
Overpass70%0.9618.0
Cache650%1.3820.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
519msReaction time
64.1%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
9.37HE damage / grenade
3.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9815 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0228%1 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0319%1 Oct →
nuke9–130.0213%1 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0820%29 Sept →
mirage12–60.1112%29 Sept →
dust213–80.1318%29 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0018%25 Sept →
cache13–80.0533%25 Sept →
vertigo13–40.1312%25 Sept →
vertigo13–60.1331%25 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1012%24 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0428%24 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0117%24 Sept →
office11–13-0.018%24 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0723%24 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0212%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.1214%23 Sept →
dust213–10.1314%23 Sept →
cache4–130.1114%23 Sept →
ancient13–90.0611%23 Sept →
ancient13–50.0919%22 Sept →
fachwerk13–40.1829%22 Sept →
shelter13–110.1210%22 Sept →
dust213–30.1624%22 Sept →
dust213–30.2318%22 Sept →
mirage13–20.1111%22 Sept →
dust212–120.0710%21 Sept →
vertigo7–130.1626%21 Sept →
inferno9–50.0214%21 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0113%20 Sept →
inferno7–90.0520%20 Sept →
cache6–130.0118%20 Sept →
ancient13–90.075%20 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0615%20 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.019%19 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0116%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0512%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0013%19 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0616%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0311%19 Sept →
inferno6–130.0918%18 Sept →
nuke12–120.0915%18 Sept →
ancient8–130.1414%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.1318%18 Sept →
mirage13–80.1019%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0912%18 Sept →
nuke10–20.0329%17 Sept →
dust27–130.0313%17 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0510%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0410%17 Sept →
mirage13–80.047%16 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0219%16 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0320%16 Sept →
nuke3–130.0525%16 Sept →
dust213–10.2321%16 Sept →
anubis13–90.2415%16 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0011%16 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0219%16 Sept →
nuke10–130.0519%15 Sept →
dust211–130.0524%15 Sept →
overpass13–50.0519%15 Sept →
mirage12–120.1312%15 Sept →
dust213–40.0515%15 Sept →
anubis5–130.1021%15 Sept →
nuke13–110.0617%15 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0211%15 Sept →
anubis8–130.0116%15 Sept →
dust210–130.0222%14 Sept →
fachwerk13–5-0.0615%14 Sept →
fachwerk4–13-0.0333%14 Sept →
fachwerk3–13-0.0218%14 Sept →
train13–00.075%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0825%12 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0010%12 Sept →
inferno13–30.0927%11 Sept →
boulder13–110.0319%11 Sept →
dust213–90.1120%10 Sept →
ancient1–130.0125%10 Sept →
inferno16–140.0415%10 Sept →
dust210–130.0320%10 Sept →
dust213–10.189%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.047%10 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0313%10 Sept →
overpass1–9-0.1618%10 Sept →
vertigo9–40.1517%10 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0015%10 Sept →
poseidon9–00.1023%10 Sept →
nuke6–9-0.0720%10 Sept →
inferno9–40.2415%10 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.059%10 Sept →
mirage3–130.0021%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.017%10 Sept →
nuke13–90.0717%10 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0115%10 Sept →
nuke9–20.2013%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0411%7 Sept →
dust26–130.0825%6 Sept →
shelter5–130.1023%6 Sept →
boulder13–20.1230%6 Sept →
mirage2–100.0912%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.