Abiodun Khumbo Temitope

Abiodun Khumbo Temitope — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198237116670[U:1:276850942]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,245Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,440Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#27587 of 261516 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,923 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,596 +1,831 5 Feb – 24 Jun · 8 days played
21,07925,107peak 25,1075 Feb24 Jun
25,107Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,923Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-02-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,923
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 78 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate56.7%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy10.9%13.2%13.7%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.071.09above
Match win rate47.4%46.9%48.4%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAbiodun Khumbo TemitopeFACEITLevel 9 · 1,923 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,923csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–38–4Last 10058%Win rateWLWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time592ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy27.2%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 22 May →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 2 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 5 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 16 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS4027–1368%0.02
mirageA2314–961%0.02
anubisC125–742%0.01
dust2C73–443%0.01
ancientA74–357%0.02
nukeS54–180%0.01
inferno—30–30%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.01
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

138,036Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
5,508Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
56.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
10.9%Shot accuracy
16,688MVPs
2,522Hours (in match)
2,953Bombs planted
1,202Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,995
AWP18,863
SSG 085,871
FAMAS1,835
SG 5531,348

Lifetime map wins

5,861inferno
4,084nuke
3,914dust2
2,674vertigo
1,439train
698office
315cbble
71bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

562Matches
52%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
88.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9446%1.0817.6
Ancient4358%1.4219.8
Inferno2450%1.1516.1
Dust22454%1.2716.9
Anubis2361%1.4618.6
Overpass1338%0.9814.8
Nuke1258%1.1016.1
Vertigo580%1.4620.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
601msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
10.82HE damage / grenade
4.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4574 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8126% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0223%12 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0224%12 Nov →
mirage13–80.0528%12 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0320%12 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.1018%16 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.0228%15 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0135%15 Jul →
ancient13–80.0226%15 Jul →
anubis13–90.0636%14 Jul →
cache13–70.1032%14 Jul →
mirage11–130.0123%14 Jul →
cache16–140.0027%12 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0414%12 Jul →
mirage13–60.0518%26 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0815%24 Jun →
cache13–10.0325%22 Jun →
mirage13–80.0343%17 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0218%17 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0030%12 Jun →
mirage13–30.1733%22 May →
mirage9–13-0.0231%22 May →
ancient11–130.0628%14 May →
cache13–11-0.0524%14 May →
cache13–110.0315%14 May →
cache13–60.0728%14 May →
cache13–90.0239%14 May →
ancient12–120.0740%14 May →
cache13–80.0223%13 May →
cache6–13-0.0123%13 May →
cache13–10.1041%13 May →
vertigo13–20.0221%13 May →
anubis11–130.0136%12 May →
mirage9–130.0333%12 May →
cache13–90.0530%12 May →
cache13–30.0620%8 May →
cache13–40.0228%6 May →
cache13–10.1231%6 May →
cache11–130.0322%5 May →
inferno9–130.0527%5 May →
cache8–13-0.0333%5 May →
cache7–130.0124%5 May →
anubis12–120.0427%5 May →
mirage9–13-0.0432%5 May →
mirage13–40.0325%4 May →
cache6–13-0.0625%4 May →
cache10–13-0.0229%3 May →
cache12–12-0.0733%3 May →
mirage12–120.0022%2 May →
cache13–110.0728%2 May →
anubis9–130.0941%2 May →
cache13–60.0414%2 May →
vertigo8–13-0.0041%2 May →
cache4–130.0046%2 May →
cache13–9-0.0042%2 May →
cache6–130.0025%2 May →
cache13–8-0.0239%2 May →
cache8–130.0029%30 Apr →
cache10–130.0429%30 Apr →
cache13–100.0331%30 Apr →
cache13–4-0.0226%29 Apr →
cache13–70.0427%29 Apr →
cache13–5-0.0026%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0331%29 Apr →
cache6–13-0.0422%29 Apr →
cache13–20.0834%29 Apr →
cache13–80.0421%29 Apr →
cache13–80.0337%29 Apr →
cache13–50.0928%29 Apr →
anubis13–60.0632%28 Apr →
dust213–20.0527%28 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0517%28 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0224%28 Apr →
mirage13–90.0029%28 Apr →
mirage13–90.0730%28 Apr →
nuke13–110.0227%27 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0827%27 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0124%27 Apr →
dust213–100.0722%27 Apr →
mirage5–130.0032%27 Apr →
mirage13–70.1439%27 Apr →
ancient13–40.0313%26 Apr →
anubis13–80.0927%26 Apr →
mirage13–50.0219%26 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0217%26 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0145%16 Apr →
dust213–60.0219%16 Apr →
mirage13–0-0.0026%16 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0538%16 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0127%15 Mar →
inferno7–130.0017%14 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.0620%14 Mar →
train4–13-0.0336%14 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0331%14 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0832%9 Feb →
anubis16–140.0119%8 Feb →
nuke13–90.0437%8 Feb →
mirage13–50.0426%8 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0619%5 Feb →
mirage13–90.0325%5 Feb →
nuke13–60.0422%5 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.