stove guard

stove guard — CS2 Stats

LV76561198233176488[U:1:272910760]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,114Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,547Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,613Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37232 of 261536 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,118 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,613 -718 24 Sept – 13 Nov · 34 days played
22,06725,809peak 25,80924 Sept13 Nov
25,957Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,118Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-09-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,118
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 382 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,196 below peak (25,809)
  • -690 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,387 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate41.7%48.2%50.9%9.3% short
Shot accuracy12.2%13.2%13.7%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.071.090.22 short
Match win rate48.0%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstove guardFACEITLevel 9 · 2,118 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,613 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,118csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning57
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLWTWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 473ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time540ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 8 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · mirage, 20 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113–862%-0.00
mirageB2010–1050%-0.01
ancientB209–1145%0.01
infernoA149–564%-0.01
cacheD103–730%-0.02
anubisB84–450%0.01
nukeD72–529%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,372Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
5,864Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
41.7%Headshot %
12.2%Shot accuracy
13,729MVPs
2,547Hours (in match)
7,384Bombs planted
1,280Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,146
P909,122
AWP4,696
FAMAS3,778
MP73,548

Lifetime map wins

37,183dust2
4,827inferno
2,035nuke
1,850vertigo
657train
465office
325cbble
9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

984Matches
52%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
80.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust227655%1.0716.6
Mirage18145%0.8915.0
Ancient16655%0.9514.8
Inferno10654%0.9014.0
Nuke6851%0.8915.0
Anubis6545%0.9414.8
Overpass5250%0.9716.1
Vertigo3253%0.9214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.1%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
535msReaction time
48.8%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
6.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0319%13 Nov →
ancient13–40.0616%13 Nov →
ancient15–150.0413%12 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0014%11 Nov →
mirage10–130.027%11 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.089%11 Nov →
dust210–130.0330%8 Nov →
inferno13–100.0427%8 Nov →
anubis13–40.0520%6 Nov →
mirage11–130.0013%6 Nov →
inferno13–7-0.0030%4 Nov →
anubis15–150.0020%4 Nov →
ancient10–130.0116%4 Nov →
nuke13–80.0428%3 Nov →
anubis13–100.0113%3 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0014%3 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0517%2 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0416%2 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0116%31 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0013%31 Oct →
mirage13–20.0122%31 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0321%31 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0318%30 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0419%30 Oct →
dust213–8-0.029%27 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0314%26 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0320%26 Oct →
dust211–130.0122%25 Oct →
inferno13–70.0016%25 Oct →
ancient9–130.0419%25 Oct →
anubis13–70.0221%24 Oct →
ancient13–40.0418%24 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0216%24 Oct →
anubis3–6-0.054%24 Oct →
ancient13–70.0826%24 Oct →
cache1–6-0.085%21 Oct →
cache13–100.0224%21 Oct →
inferno13–80.0113%21 Oct →
mirage4–10.0133%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0617%20 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0118%20 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0313%20 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0223%19 Oct →
inferno8–130.0013%19 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0715%19 Oct →
anubis13–80.0116%17 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0414%17 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.047%17 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0416%17 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.059%17 Oct →
anubis4–130.0024%16 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0219%16 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0316%16 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0227%16 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0417%16 Oct →
ancient13–50.0214%14 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0312%14 Oct →
ancient13–90.0816%14 Oct →
anubis10–130.0113%13 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0823%13 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0015%13 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0116%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0718%12 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0113%12 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0220%11 Oct →
dust213–90.0027%11 Oct →
dust213–90.0115%9 Oct →
inferno13–30.0910%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.1120%8 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0022%8 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0219%8 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0216%7 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0229%7 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0317%7 Oct →
dust213–90.0115%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0225%6 Oct →
dust27–130.0118%6 Oct →
ancient13–80.0313%5 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0121%5 Oct →
mirage8–130.0210%4 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0316%4 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0716%3 Oct →
cache10–130.0022%27 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0729%27 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0113%26 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0317%26 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.093%26 Sept →
ancient13–20.0919%26 Sept →
mirage13–90.0215%26 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0322%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0818%26 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0119%25 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0119%25 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0117%25 Sept →
dust213–90.0217%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0112%25 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0315%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0130%25 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0115%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0514%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.