Ruby

Ruby — CS2 Stats

US76561198230951900[U:1:270686172]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

954Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,540Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,554Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#92342 of 260025 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,554 -445 25 Aug – 4 Oct · 22 days played
17,95622,075peak 22,07525 Aug4 Oct
22,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,521 below peak (22,075)
  • -2,361 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 446 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate47.4%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy18.3%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.870.991.020.15 short
Match win rate33.3%43.9%44.7%11.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRubyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,554 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning45
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time606ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–7 · overpass, 8 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 3 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 25nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2812–1643%-0.01
mirageA2515–1060%-0.01
cacheC188–1044%-0.03
infernoC177–1041%-0.04
nukeD62–433%-0.04
ancient—20–20%-0.02
anubis—22–0100%0.05
debris—11–0100%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

96,617Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
4,285Matches
33.3%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
7,998MVPs
2,491Hours (in match)
3,843Bombs planted
753Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,836
AWP4,481
MP92,144
MAC-101,401
FAMAS1,398

Lifetime map wins

8,203dust2
4,039inferno
851nuke
690vertigo
651train
534lake
442cbble
414bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

208Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
78.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3057%0.9212.8
Inferno1457%0.7813.1
Anubis1242%0.7112.5
Dust21040%1.0215.0
Cache862%1.1413.5
Nuke580%0.7112.2
Vertigo425%0.459.0
Ancient333%1.2514.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
90.9%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
619msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
12.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2819% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.0320%3 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0212%14 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0813%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0615%13 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0617%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.069%7 Oct →
nuke13–70.0316%7 Oct →
inferno13–80.0111%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.0312%5 Oct →
dust210–130.0427%5 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0312%4 Oct →
mirage13–100.0111%4 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0312%4 Oct →
dust213–50.0616%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.080%4 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0623%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0036%3 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0616%3 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0914%3 Oct →
inferno6–130.009%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0419%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0612%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0711%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0114%2 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0518%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0120%1 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0815%30 Sept →
cache11–130.0117%30 Sept →
mirage13–40.0814%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0413%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0217%28 Sept →
dust213–10.0023%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0616%27 Sept →
ancient6–130.037%27 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0121%26 Sept →
cache9–130.0415%22 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.038%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0116%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.038%20 Sept →
dust213–20.027%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0119%16 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0215%16 Sept →
dust29–130.0216%15 Sept →
anubis13–50.0920%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0317%13 Sept →
mirage3–130.0211%13 Sept →
cache13–90.005%11 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0325%10 Sept →
cache13–3-0.048%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.0618%9 Sept →
dust211–130.0315%9 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0313%9 Sept →
dust213–5-0.1017%8 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1433%8 Sept →
debris9–5-0.037%8 Sept →
overpass9–70.1218%8 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0614%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0818%8 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0415%8 Sept →
anubis13–50.0236%7 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0718%7 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0718%7 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0320%7 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0420%7 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0424%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0813%7 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0614%7 Sept →
dust211–130.0415%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0313%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0617%6 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0511%6 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0520%6 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0610%5 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0313%5 Sept →
mirage13–50.0519%4 Sept →
dust213–60.0116%4 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0316%4 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0425%4 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0715%2 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0616%2 Sept →
dust25–130.0021%1 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.014%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0119%1 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0210%31 Aug →
dust213–60.008%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0012%30 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0416%30 Aug →
cache13–90.0112%29 Aug →
cache13–10-0.056%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0611%29 Aug →
cache13–8-0.069%29 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0430%29 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0420%29 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.028%28 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0112%28 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0622%27 Aug →
inferno13–40.0614%26 Aug →
dust26–13-0.077%26 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.076%25 Aug →
mirage13–80.0311%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.