✪RandomX

✪RandomX — CS2 Stats

76561198222051656[U:1:261785928]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,343Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,136 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,343 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 21 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,868 +5,237 27 Apr26 May · 10 days played
15,52920,868peak 20,86827 Apr26 May
Faceit ELO: 2,136 +0 3 Sept20 Sept · 4 observations
2,1362,136peak 2,1363 Sept20 Sept
20,868Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,136Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-04-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,136
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 364 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪RandomXFACEITLevel 9 · 2,136 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,136csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning48
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52471Last 10052%Win rateLLLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time603ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 11–13 · cache, 27 Jul
44%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · nuke, 26 May
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 28 Jul
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2216673%0.03
nukeC2081240%0.02
infernoC145936%0.01
cacheA138562%0.03
ancientA116555%0.05
dust2C73443%0.00
anubisD62433%-0.02
overpassB63350%0.10
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,676Matches
51%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
78.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26054%1.2216.8
Inferno16146%1.0815.9
Ancient14447%1.0716.3
Nuke13252%1.1716.4
Anubis9247%1.0114.8
Dust28848%1.1015.9
Overpass5153%1.3217.9
Train2836%1.0115.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
599msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
11.23HE damage / grenade
9.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.752% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0320%14 Sept
ancient2–50.0814%14 Sept
dust212–160.0324%3 Sept
vertigo13–100.0417%1 Sept
nuke6–13-0.076%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0523%25 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0515%25 Aug
dust29–130.0511%17 Aug
ancient9–130.0118%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0126%17 Aug
nuke15–150.1015%16 Aug
nuke14–16-0.008%15 Aug
mirage13–30.045%14 Aug
ancient16–190.0020%12 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0110%7 Aug
inferno22–19-0.0217%5 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0317%5 Aug
cache13–8-0.0015%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0021%3 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0917%28 Jul
inferno13–70.0013%28 Jul
cache11–130.2323%27 Jul
inferno11–130.0114%24 Jul
inferno16–190.0114%24 Jul
inferno13–80.079%22 Jul
ancient7–130.0110%22 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0015%22 Jul
cache13–110.0225%22 Jul
dust29–13-0.0620%22 Jul
dust29–13-0.0524%20 Jul
nuke16–190.0216%20 Jul
nuke13–40.0122%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0415%13 Jul
cache13–8-0.0214%9 Jul
inferno11–130.0224%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0420%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0830%30 Jun
nuke8–130.0226%30 Jun
inferno8–130.0421%26 Jun
ancient19–170.0511%26 Jun
cache4–13-0.0110%25 Jun
cache13–11-0.0122%25 Jun
mirage13–100.0424%23 Jun
cache13–11-0.0017%23 Jun
mirage13–90.047%18 Jun
ancient13–8-0.028%16 Jun
anubis10–130.0019%11 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0212%9 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0420%9 Jun
mirage13–80.0619%2 Jun
cache11–130.0714%31 May
cache13–90.0313%31 May
cache13–70.0921%31 May
cache6–13-0.0020%31 May
nuke16–12-0.0115%28 May
mirage13–10-0.0321%28 May
nuke5–130.0744%26 May
inferno12–16-0.0124%26 May
nuke9–13-0.0115%25 May
mirage13–70.0317%25 May
cache10–130.0222%25 May
ancient13–50.1824%25 May
nuke13–50.2016%25 May
mirage14–160.0210%25 May
ancient16–140.0119%25 May
overpass13–70.0426%22 May
nuke13–4-0.0123%22 May
mirage13–110.0725%22 May
ancient5–130.0728%22 May
inferno11–13-0.0510%20 May
overpass6–130.0024%16 May
nuke13–80.0610%14 May
nuke9–13-0.0923%14 May
nuke11–13-0.036%14 May
inferno11–13-0.0010%13 May
dust213–60.0320%13 May
dust213–8-0.0310%13 May
mirage13–30.0526%13 May
overpass13–70.2023%13 May
dust213–90.0517%12 May
mirage13–60.0213%12 May
inferno10–130.0516%12 May
ancient13–110.0724%10 May
nuke13–100.0610%10 May
overpass8–130.0811%10 May
mirage13–70.1222%8 May
overpass13–160.0922%8 May
nuke13–80.0518%8 May
nuke9–130.048%7 May
mirage22–190.0319%7 May
mirage13–10-0.017%5 May
overpass13–80.1520%5 May
mirage12–160.1319%28 Apr
anubis13–80.026%27 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0211%27 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0013%26 Apr
cache13–80.0217%22 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0016%22 Apr
ancient13–100.0622%22 Apr
mirage13–30.009%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →