Perc Rodgers

Perc Rodgers — CS2 Stats

76561198220517621[U:1:260251893]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,138Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,188Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+5Tracked matches · now 1,138
−10.3ppWin rate · 55.2% → 44.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,999 -3,404 12 Mar – 6 Jul · 38 days played
16,90421,171peak 21,17112 Mar6 Jul
21,171Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-03-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.2%44.8%45.7%3.5% short
Shot accuracy9.3%12.4%12.7%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.031.050.11 short
Match win rate45.6%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPerc RodgersFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning46
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLLLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −101ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility2.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.6
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time636ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 29 Mar →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 29 Apr →
438msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 15 Mar →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 7 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 9overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3013–1743%-0.02
ancientB199–1047%-0.01
dust2C187–1139%-0.03
anubisA95–456%-0.03
infernoD93–633%-0.03
cacheB63–350%0.02
overpassD51–420%-0.02
nuke—42–250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,443Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,304Matches
45.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
42.2%Headshot %
9.3%Shot accuracy
5,818MVPs
869Hours (in match)
1,532Bombs planted
412Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,059inferno
2,728dust2
1,092nuke
715train
440vertigo
284cbble
122office
60italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
58%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
65.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2850%0.8314.4
Ancient1540%0.8413.3
Anubis1275%0.9413.7
Nuke5100%0.9514.6
Overpass560%0.8111.0
Dust2425%0.6911.3
Cache450%0.8011.5
Inferno3100%0.8017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
635msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.89HE damage / grenade
2.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4162 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9562% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0424%10 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.105%10 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0421%10 Oct →
cache5–130.0513%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.0212%23 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0118%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0826%17 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0213%2 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0823%29 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.073%27 Jul →
cache16–14-0.029%9 Jul →
ancient13–80.0026%9 Jul →
ancient13–20.0323%7 Jul →
anubis13–60.0320%7 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0324%6 Jul →
dust20–6-0.050%6 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.067%2 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0210%22 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0218%10 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0314%3 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0411%30 May →
mirage12–160.0220%18 May →
inferno15–15-0.0523%14 May →
dust213–10-0.0519%14 May →
inferno13–16-0.0220%13 May →
ancient16–14-0.0119%12 May →
cache8–13-0.0125%7 May →
cache13–110.0718%30 Apr →
cache13–80.0336%29 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0611%28 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0219%28 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.016%27 Apr →
overpass16–14-0.0611%27 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0210%24 Apr →
dust25–2-0.060%23 Apr →
ancient6–130.0112%21 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0718%21 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0210%17 Apr →
mirage13–16-0.0022%16 Apr →
anubis13–100.0420%15 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0024%14 Apr →
mirage12–160.0017%14 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0612%14 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0324%14 Apr →
dust214–16-0.056%13 Apr →
mirage7–1-0.0128%13 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0524%13 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0123%9 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0414%9 Apr →
mirage5–9-0.0115%9 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0214%9 Apr →
overpass7–130.0111%7 Apr →
ancient13–100.0015%7 Apr →
mirage9–130.0119%6 Apr →
anubis13–100.0321%6 Apr →
overpass10–130.0218%5 Apr →
dust215–15-0.0526%5 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0122%5 Apr →
inferno15–150.0011%5 Apr →
inferno13–110.0730%3 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0513%2 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.054%2 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0623%2 Apr →
anubis1–13-0.1735%31 Mar →
mirage6–130.0010%31 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.038%30 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0020%30 Mar →
nuke13–9-0.0119%29 Mar →
mirage13–60.0922%29 Mar →
ancient13–40.0211%27 Mar →
dust29–130.0318%27 Mar →
nuke4–130.0231%27 Mar →
ancient13–90.059%27 Mar →
anubis15–15-0.0311%26 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.039%26 Mar →
dust213–80.0227%26 Mar →
dust216–140.0236%26 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0619%26 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0125%25 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0917%25 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0427%25 Mar →
mirage16–12-0.0022%25 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0718%24 Mar →
dust213–11-0.058%24 Mar →
mirage7–130.0132%24 Mar →
dust213–100.0022%24 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0031%19 Mar →
ancient13–60.0018%19 Mar →
overpass9–130.0114%19 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0228%18 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.093%18 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0210%17 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.1015%17 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0423%16 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0414%16 Mar →
mirage13–80.0316%15 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0228%15 Mar →
ancient8–130.014%15 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.039%12 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.0223%12 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.