MARA 👑 — CS2 Stats

76561198217341027[U:1:257075299]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,358Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,271Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating22,089Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#53165 of 251995 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,089 +2,090 2 Aug – 5 Oct · 24 days played

23,274Peak Premier in tracked matches

30Days played since 2026-07-13

Premier CS Rating

825 below peak (22,914)
+565 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,911 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
Purple band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	37	—	—
Win rate	62%	—	—
K/D	0.93	—	—
Headshot %	43%	—	—

Measured 14 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	50.6%	44.8%	45.7%	above
Shot accuracy	17.0%	12.4%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.21	1.03	1.05	above
Match win rate	42.4%	45.2%	45.7%	3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning58

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWTLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–2–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

9–9–2 · 45% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.3

Utility5.8

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.8

Utility5.8

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time561ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms

Headshot accuracy15.3%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 9 Aug →

39%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · poseidon, 17 Aug →

375msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · inferno, 13 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 25 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 22cacheWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	-0.01
inferno	A	22	14–8	64%	-0.01
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.01
anubis	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
ancient	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.02
dust2	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.04
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.01
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.09
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.11
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

134,713Lifetime kills

1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players

7,641Matches

42.4%Match win rate

50.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players

17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players

14,290MVPs

2,306Hours (in match)

7,865Bombs planted

1,204Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,004

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,235

AWP17,014

Desert Eagle9,130

P2000 / USP-S8,254

Glock-184,993

P903,914

SG 5533,269

Galil AR3,214

Five-SeveN3,044

Lifetime map wins

11,752inferno

3,751dust2

3,160nuke

2,039vertigo

1,523train

1,181cbble

922lake

377bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

248Matches

54%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

76.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	28	46%	0.93	15.9
Mirage	22	68%	0.95	12.6
Vertigo	14	57%	1.13	14.6
Nuke	13	54%	1.10	14.2
Anubis	13	69%	1.03	14.3
Dust2	7	0%	0.71	11.1
Ancient	4	50%	0.99	13.5
Cache	2	100%	1.72	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.3%Spray accuracy

77.8%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

556msReaction time

59.9%T opening success

35.6%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

11.67HE damage / grenade

10.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 35.5505% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	-0.07	16%	5 Oct →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	4%	5 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	15%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.02	29%	4 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	13%	2 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	12%	2 Oct →
boulder	13–9	0.05	18%	30 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	10%	30 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	15%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	24%	26 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.09	15%	23 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	9%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.04	10%	21 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.04	16%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	15%	21 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	15%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	21%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	13%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.02	17%	15 Sept →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	12%	15 Sept →
mirage	16–13	0.01	23%	15 Sept →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	11%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	14%	11 Sept →
dust2	4–13	0.04	17%	11 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	17%	31 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	18%	31 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	19%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.08	20%	30 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	16%	30 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	10%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	11%	30 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	14%	30 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	17%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	16%	30 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	28%	30 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	23%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	18%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	15%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	20%	29 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	18%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	17%	28 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.01	19%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	13%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.06	10%	27 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	13%	26 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	21%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	14%	26 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	12%	26 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	10%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	20%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.00	14%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	9%	25 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	33%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	20%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	21%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	15%	24 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	14%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	24%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	25%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–7	0.06	21%	17 Aug →
inferno	6–9	0.00	21%	17 Aug →
eldorado	9–7	-0.09	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–9	0.00	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–7	-0.06	21%	17 Aug →
poseidon	6–9	-0.11	39%	17 Aug →
debris	4–9	-0.15	36%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.07	6%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	28%	17 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	14%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	7%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.06	18%	15 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.08	16%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.15	31%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	7%	9 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	14%	5 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	8%	5 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	14%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	16%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.00	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	8%	4 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.01	7%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	6%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	17%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	17%	2 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	25%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.05	22%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.08	30%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	28%	18 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	5%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	17%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.00	18%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	22%	13 Jul →