Roelof053

Roelof053 — CS2 Stats

NL76561198213055769[U:1:252790041]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

565Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,396Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,877Top 50% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70995 of 258295 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,623 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,877 +247 4 Sept – 24 Oct · 12 days played
20,02621,144peak 21,1444 Sept24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,623 +0 24 Sept – 26 Sept · 2 observations
1,6231,623peak 1,62324 Sept26 Sept
21,195Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,623Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-02-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,623
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 267 below peak (21,144)
  • +493 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,123 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches37——
Win rate46%——
K/D3.79——
Headshot %73%——

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 28 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.6%46.8%48.2%3.7% short
Shot accuracy15.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.241.061.07above
Match win rate64.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRoelof053FACEITLevel 8 · 1,623 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,877 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,623csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning64
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time516ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 27 Apr →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 3 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 5 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2612–1446%-0.00
infernoB2211–1150%-0.01
dust2A116–555%0.01
nukeA116–555%-0.01
anubisC114–736%-0.01
ancientC94–544%-0.02
cacheA74–357%0.00
vertigo—22–0100%-0.00
overpass—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,931Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
4,311Matches
64.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players
44.6%Headshot %
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10,696MVPs
1,405Hours (in match)
1,456Bombs planted
1,728Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,230
AWP7,315
SSG 081,980
MP91,670
FAMAS1,632

Lifetime map wins

3,054inferno
2,153dust2
1,313lake
840nuke
466vertigo
427train
112safehouse
54cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

534Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
83.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11049%1.1317.7
Dust29648%1.0315.2
Inferno7855%1.1115.7
Ancient6139%1.0116.7
Anubis4154%1.1015.9
Nuke3560%1.0616.4
Cache1362%1.0017.9
Overpass862%1.2319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
508msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
6.67HE damage / grenade
4.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4745 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0219%24 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0021%24 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0311%21 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0419%12 Oct →
cache13–90.0618%12 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0711%11 Oct →
inferno13–30.0114%5 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0219%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0321%4 Oct →
mirage13–90.0120%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.0015%4 Oct →
dust213–50.0313%4 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0523%3 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.049%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.0441%3 Oct →
anubis13–110.0211%3 Oct →
nuke13–70.0022%3 Oct →
mirage13–60.0016%3 Oct →
cache3–130.0011%30 Sept →
dust214–160.0314%30 Sept →
inferno10–130.0617%26 Sept →
inferno16–140.0118%25 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0515%24 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0027%24 Sept →
mirage7–130.0615%23 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0315%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0619%16 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0812%10 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0018%10 Sept →
inferno13–40.0618%7 Sept →
ancient19–150.028%6 Sept →
cache13–100.0514%6 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0829%6 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.018%4 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0520%4 Sept →
ancient11–130.0215%4 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0810%4 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0117%4 Sept →
mirage13–100.0320%4 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.007%3 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.018%26 Aug →
inferno13–80.0318%26 Aug →
mirage13–20.0613%22 Aug →
nuke10–130.015%21 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0515%21 Aug →
mirage13–160.0116%19 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0317%19 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0714%18 Aug →
anubis13–30.0212%18 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0610%17 Aug →
anubis10–130.0225%17 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0517%17 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0121%17 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.059%7 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0115%7 Aug →
dust213–90.0021%5 Aug →
dust29–13-0.089%4 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0319%3 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0527%3 Aug →
dust213–80.0223%2 Aug →
dust29–130.0322%1 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0521%31 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.055%29 Jul →
ancient13–2-0.0411%29 Jul →
inferno13–30.0417%29 Jul →
nuke13–70.0318%29 Jul →
cache16–12-0.027%28 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0216%28 Jul →
anubis6–130.0214%27 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0516%25 Jul →
inferno13–90.0520%24 Jul →
mirage13–70.0715%24 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0315%20 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0213%20 Jul →
nuke13–50.0010%18 Jul →
anubis16–14-0.0422%18 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0411%18 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0213%15 Jul →
inferno13–80.0614%14 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0615%14 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0014%14 Jul →
anubis13–70.0711%9 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0229%9 Jul →
dust28–30.0438%9 Jul →
dust213–20.0112%9 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0319%9 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.038%8 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0721%8 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0120%7 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0025%30 Apr →
mirage13–30.119%27 Apr →
mirage13–30.0814%27 Apr →
dust213–40.0520%1 Apr →
inferno13–100.0613%29 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0616%13 Mar →
mirage7–130.0216%9 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0421%9 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0112%3 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0117%2 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.047%2 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.