Bad Gones

Bad Gones — CS2 Stats

GB76561198212776812[U:1:252511084]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,501Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,434Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,536Top 10% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16971 of 258912 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,536 +4,452 28 Jun – 13 Oct · 17 days played
21,08426,414peak 26,41428 Jun13 Oct
26,975Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,119Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-06-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,119
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 381 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 878 below peak (26,414)
  • -567 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,778 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,464 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate46.9%49.3%50.9%4.0% short
Shot accuracy15.9%13.4%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.431.121.18above
Match win rate48.1%48.5%51.9%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBad GonesPREMIER25,536 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,119csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLLWTLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time505ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 10–2 · mirage, 6 Aug →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 10–2 · mirage, 6 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 4 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213–959%-0.01
dust2B178–947%-0.01
ancientB178–947%-0.00
cacheB137–654%0.02
mirageA127–558%0.00
anubisD124–833%-0.02
train—20–20%0.01
overpass—22–0100%0.01
nuke—10–10%0.03
fachwerk—11–0100%0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

225,062Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 25% of Red band
12,384Matches
48.1%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Red band
18,276MVPs
4,771Hours (in match)
8,070Bombs planted
1,366Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,679
Molotov29,977
AWP15,320
FAMAS4,806
MAC-104,231
Negev3,703

Lifetime map wins

12,668dust2
12,492inferno
3,752nuke
3,306vertigo
2,481train
1,821cbble
842office
540aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,648Matches
52%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
80.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7063%0.9715.5
Anubis4848%0.9415.9
Inferno3540%1.0315.7
Vertigo2548%0.9214.1
Mirage2255%1.0714.7
Dust21856%1.0517.6
Overpass1040%0.8912.5
Nuke786%1.1517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
488msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
7.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0424%25 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0126%25 Oct →
dust213–40.0624%13 Oct →
train12–120.0627%11 Oct →
train9–13-0.0437%11 Oct →
ancient13–40.0813%19 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0419%19 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0014%19 Sept →
mirage3–10.0336%19 Sept →
inferno3–130.0932%19 Sept →
dust24–130.029%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0824%19 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0117%15 Sept →
ancient7–130.0310%15 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0316%15 Sept →
cache5–130.0533%15 Sept →
mirage11–130.0616%14 Sept →
cache13–60.0422%14 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0527%14 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0110%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.070%29 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0333%29 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0231%23 Aug →
ancient13–80.0120%23 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0020%23 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0218%23 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0315%23 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0028%22 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.100%22 Aug →
anubis6–130.0024%22 Aug →
dust213–100.0137%22 Aug →
dust25–130.0127%22 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.047%22 Aug →
dust25–130.0521%22 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0417%22 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.010%22 Aug →
dust23–0-0.050%22 Aug →
cache13–80.0127%22 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0324%22 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0121%20 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0316%16 Aug →
cache12–120.0323%16 Aug →
nuke12–120.0324%16 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0431%16 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0222%14 Aug →
fachwerk13–80.0624%6 Aug →
mirage10–20.1052%6 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0117%6 Aug →
ancient8–130.0215%2 Aug →
mirage11–130.0220%2 Aug →
cache13–40.0618%2 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.1315%2 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0713%31 Jul →
inferno13–30.0142%31 Jul →
vertigo13–80.0318%28 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0419%28 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0132%28 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0315%28 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0124%12 Jul →
dust211–00.0311%12 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0234%11 Jul →
cache13–30.0326%11 Jul →
ancient10–130.0728%11 Jul →
cache13–50.0630%11 Jul →
cache13–80.0132%11 Jul →
inferno13–110.019%5 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0317%5 Jul →
inferno13–70.0233%5 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.0412%5 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0611%5 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0017%5 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0814%5 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0122%5 Jul →
mirage11–130.0018%5 Jul →
dust210–130.0232%5 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0233%5 Jul →
ancient13–30.0121%5 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0627%5 Jul →
ancient3–130.0226%5 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0320%4 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0912%4 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0317%4 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0229%4 Jul →
mirage13–30.0114%4 Jul →
overpass13–90.0223%4 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0317%4 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0036%4 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0619%3 Jul →
anubis13–40.0320%3 Jul →
anubis3–130.0034%3 Jul →
mirage13–50.0122%1 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0221%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0229%1 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0218%1 Jul →
inferno13–60.0321%1 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0418%28 Jun →
ancient13–20.0917%28 Jun →
inferno10–130.0126%28 Jun →
inferno13–8-0.0310%28 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0019%28 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.