mart

mart — CS2 Stats

76561198211035585[U:1:250769857]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

651Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,163Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,885Top 50% of 209,427 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86754 of 256991 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,513 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,885 -114 23 Aug – 22 Oct · 26 days played
19,70421,378peak 21,37823 Aug22 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,513 +0 1 Sept – 4 Oct · 3 observations
1,5131,513peak 1,5131 Sept4 Oct
21,378Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,513Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,513
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 18 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,493 below peak (21,378)
  • -337 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 115 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches96——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.28——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 24 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.3%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy16.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.231.061.07above
Match win rate45.2%46.3%46.9%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmartFACEITLevel 8 · 1,513 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,885 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,513csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning64
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time518ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–5 · office, 1 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 4 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2214–864%0.04
mirageB147–750%0.03
nukeC135–838%0.04
cacheB136–746%0.03
dust2D113–827%0.04
infernoS118–373%0.04
anubisA117–464%0.05
train—22–0100%0.10
office—21–150%0.17
overpass—10–10%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,327Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3,177Matches
45.2%Match win rate
48.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8,834MVPs
1,007Hours (in match)
1,379Bombs planted
601Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,244
AWP6,905
SSG 082,072
P901,040
SG 5531,026

Lifetime map wins

5,328dust2
2,851nuke
2,069inferno
1,139train
1,010cbble
653vertigo
618lake
273office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

156Matches
56%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
88.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2458%1.2217.6
Nuke2138%1.0117.5
Mirage2060%1.2318.9
Dust22045%1.0616.4
Inferno1377%1.5517.8
Anubis1070%1.0016.0
Cache956%1.1518.6
Overpass771%1.1915.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.2%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
524msReaction time
57.6%T opening success
60.6%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
11.56HE damage / grenade
7.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3106 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0228%22 Oct →
ancient13–40.0427%20 Oct →
dust23–130.0931%17 Oct →
ancient13–90.0718%17 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0512%15 Oct →
nuke11–130.0111%15 Oct →
nuke10–130.0720%14 Oct →
anubis13–110.0116%14 Oct →
nuke11–130.0919%14 Oct →
ancient13–100.1019%14 Oct →
ancient11–4-0.0315%13 Oct →
ancient13–110.0713%13 Oct →
train13–50.1515%13 Oct →
train13–110.0536%13 Oct →
mirage7–130.0011%13 Oct →
anubis11–130.1213%13 Oct →
ancient10–130.0722%12 Oct →
cache10–130.1124%12 Oct →
cache10–130.0327%12 Oct →
anubis13–100.0625%12 Oct →
ancient13–80.0725%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.1313%10 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0317%9 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0012%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0012%8 Oct →
cache9–130.039%8 Oct →
dust213–100.0313%8 Oct →
inferno13–30.0820%8 Oct →
inferno10–130.0810%8 Oct →
mirage9–130.0130%8 Oct →
dust28–130.0616%7 Oct →
nuke9–130.0117%7 Oct →
cache8–130.0129%7 Oct →
inferno13–110.0114%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0312%6 Oct →
cache13–40.1418%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.1424%5 Oct →
mirage9–130.0436%5 Oct →
inferno13–80.1321%5 Oct →
mirage10–130.0615%4 Oct →
cache13–100.0412%4 Oct →
nuke13–80.0311%4 Oct →
dust24–130.0222%4 Oct →
dust213–40.0119%4 Oct →
nuke3–00.0050%4 Oct →
anubis13–60.1812%4 Oct →
dust24–130.0115%4 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0226%4 Oct →
inferno13–20.1125%3 Oct →
dust28–130.1440%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.1413%3 Oct →
mirage7–130.0423%3 Oct →
cache10–130.0211%3 Oct →
inferno10–130.0722%3 Oct →
anubis16–130.0014%2 Oct →
ancient16–130.1023%2 Oct →
dust216–130.1123%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0415%2 Oct →
anubis7–130.0615%2 Oct →
overpass12–120.0614%2 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0217%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0321%2 Oct →
inferno13–90.0430%1 Oct →
ancient4–130.0415%1 Oct →
nuke13–20.2323%1 Oct →
office13–50.2926%1 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0314%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0527%29 Sept →
anubis13–100.0125%29 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0219%29 Sept →
ancient11–130.0628%24 Sept →
anubis10–130.0818%23 Sept →
cache19–17-0.0234%23 Sept →
inferno16–130.0318%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.0215%20 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0118%19 Sept →
mirage13–80.0322%19 Sept →
ancient13–70.0333%18 Sept →
cache13–110.0124%18 Sept →
ancient16–120.1515%10 Sept →
nuke16–130.1117%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0321%5 Sept →
anubis13–100.0422%5 Sept →
office6–130.0526%5 Sept →
anubis6–130.0212%3 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0225%28 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0419%28 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0514%28 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0417%28 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0215%24 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0413%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.0423%24 Aug →
dust29–130.0128%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0219%24 Aug →
ancient13–40.0217%23 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0423%23 Aug →
ancient15–150.0213%23 Aug →
ancient13–70.0918%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.1316%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.