Lord Rebcheb

Lord Rebcheb — CS2 Stats

DE76561198210819360[U:1:250553632]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,217Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,042Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,190Blue band · top ~48.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,323 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+327Premier CS Rating · 10,863 → 11,190
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,190 -4,409 23 Jul20 Sept · 27 days played
10,86317,042peak 17,04223 Jul20 Sept
17,042Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,323Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,323
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 28 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,852 below peak (17,042)
  • -3,810 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,810 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.9%46.8%48.3%10.3% short
Shot accuracy10.3%13.0%13.2%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.061.070.18 short
Match win rate44.0%46.3%46.9%2.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLord RebchebFACEITLevel 8 · 1,323 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER11,190 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,323csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning40
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41536Last 10041%Win rateWLLTLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.3
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time578ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 29 Aug
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 31 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 12 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 23mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%0.03
cacheD2371630%0.05
ancientC1661038%0.01
infernoB136746%0.02
nukeB126650%0.01
mirageD82625%0.02
anubis41325%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

127,846Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
7,447Matches
44.0%Match win rate
37.9%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy
15,075MVPs
3,131Hours (in match)
7,686Bombs planted
1,919Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,060
AWP11,934
MAC-107,561
Negev6,183
SG 5534,149
Knife3,590

Lifetime map wins

21,130dust2
11,133inferno
2,110nuke
1,695vertigo
1,147train
977cbble
444office
112lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

222Matches
55%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
75.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5254%0.9114.6
Vertigo4560%0.8214.2
Anubis3768%0.9815.0
Dust23441%0.9716.8
Mirage1947%0.7412.9
Ancient1136%1.0616.8
Train1060%0.8915.2
Nuke967%0.9714.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.5%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
574msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
13.37HE damage / grenade
3.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8406 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3813% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0633%20 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0219%13 Sept
anubis5–130.029%12 Sept
mirage15–150.059%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.0014%12 Sept
cache9–130.0216%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.013%12 Sept
nuke13–110.0431%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0624%11 Sept
cache13–90.0922%11 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0127%6 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0620%6 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0123%1 Sept
dust216–130.0011%29 Aug
cache13–40.0624%29 Aug
cache13–60.1924%29 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0513%22 Aug
dust214–160.0014%22 Aug
dust211–130.1032%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0318%22 Aug
inferno13–80.0316%22 Aug
nuke13–20.0228%22 Aug
ancient13–90.0416%22 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0114%22 Aug
nuke1–7-0.0627%22 Aug
ancient10–130.0011%21 Aug
cache5–13-0.0625%21 Aug
inferno13–80.0330%21 Aug
nuke5–130.038%19 Aug
dust213–80.0015%19 Aug
dust210–130.0315%17 Aug
cache6–130.0011%16 Aug
dust213–80.0618%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0219%15 Aug
anubis15–150.0110%15 Aug
ancient13–2-0.005%15 Aug
nuke13–160.0720%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0413%15 Aug
inferno8–130.0322%15 Aug
cache10–130.0712%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0211%14 Aug
cache13–100.037%14 Aug
cache10–130.0323%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0222%14 Aug
nuke13–30.0318%14 Aug
cache9–130.0516%14 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0119%14 Aug
dust26–130.0223%13 Aug
inferno8–130.0610%13 Aug
dust214–16-0.0122%13 Aug
mirage5–130.0327%13 Aug
cache13–6-0.007%12 Aug
cache12–120.0115%12 Aug
mirage9–130.0315%12 Aug
cache12–12-0.0611%11 Aug
inferno13–30.0820%10 Aug
dust213–20.0614%10 Aug
nuke7–130.0017%10 Aug
cache5–13-0.018%9 Aug
dust213–70.0115%7 Aug
inferno11–130.0820%7 Aug
nuke13–110.0317%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.059%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0912%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0317%2 Aug
inferno13–90.0431%2 Aug
ancient13–00.1021%2 Aug
dust213–20.0312%1 Aug
ancient13–100.0714%1 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.0417%1 Aug
nuke13–20.0716%1 Aug
cache12–120.1417%1 Aug
ancient10–130.0415%31 Jul
dust213–00.0921%31 Jul
dust213–80.0640%31 Jul
inferno12–160.0111%31 Jul
dust214–160.0218%26 Jul
cache13–20.116%26 Jul
cache9–130.0619%26 Jul
cache9–130.1813%25 Jul
dust213–60.0513%25 Jul
mirage13–70.0121%25 Jul
cache10–130.0815%25 Jul
dust213–100.0315%25 Jul
anubis13–40.0216%25 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0418%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0118%25 Jul
cache13–50.0814%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.006%25 Jul
dust213–100.0519%24 Jul
ancient15–150.069%24 Jul
mirage12–160.0333%24 Jul
cache10–130.0017%24 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0018%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0235%24 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0325%24 Jul
dust213–60.1428%23 Jul
anubis6–130.0016%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0217%23 Jul
ancient7–13-0.048%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →