HEXENMEISTER

HEXENMEISTER — CS2 Stats

LI76561198201112783[U:1:240847055]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,981Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,385Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,947Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33597 of 261544 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,409 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,981 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,947 +2,286 24 Mar – 18 Oct · 38 days played
20,61823,947peak 23,94724 Mar18 Oct
23,947Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,844Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-24

Faceit ELO

  • 435 below peak (1,844)
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 122 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,947
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,053 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 18 Oct 2026 and 14 Nov 2026.

Measured 18 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 15 Sep 2026 → 18 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.0%48.2%50.9%3.0% short
Shot accuracy10.1%13.2%13.7%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.071.090.07 short
Match win rate47.2%46.9%48.4%1.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHEXENMEISTERFACEITLevel 9 · 1,409 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,947 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,844csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning48
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–42Last 10058%Win rateWWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +77ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time612ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 3 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 29 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · overpass, 13 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 8 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 35dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3524–1169%0.01
infernoS2013–765%0.01
dust2C114–736%-0.01
overpassC104–640%-0.02
nukeC104–640%-0.01
ancientS64–267%0.02
anubis—42–250%-0.00
cache—33–0100%0.02
vertigo—10–10%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

107,285Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
4,771Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
48.0%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
12,571MVPs
2,385Hours (in match)
7,406Bombs planted
1,353Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,507
AWP13,952
FAMAS1,898
MAC-101,843
P2501,338

Lifetime map wins

8,548inferno
4,942dust2
2,743nuke
1,483vertigo
1,201train
155office
96cbble
34lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,035Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
76.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16952%1.0514.9
Dust26546%1.0315.5
Inferno6157%1.1115.9
Nuke4159%1.0014.5
Overpass3658%1.2216.0
Ancient2948%1.0115.3
Anubis1644%1.2016.4
Cache1145%1.2019.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.0%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
611msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.89HE damage / grenade
15.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4065% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0740%25 Jun →
inferno13–70.0224%25 Jun →
mirage16–130.0227%25 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0523%24 Jun →
mirage13–5-0.0124%24 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0415%24 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.1029%23 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0214%22 Jun →
inferno13–110.0230%22 Jun →
ancient13–50.0221%22 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0420%13 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0125%12 Jun →
nuke13–90.0017%8 Jun →
mirage12–160.0127%7 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0530%7 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0110%7 Jun →
mirage13–90.0424%6 Jun →
mirage16–130.0823%6 Jun →
mirage11–130.0323%6 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0922%4 Jun →
mirage13–110.0223%31 May →
dust23–13-0.0912%26 May →
inferno13–110.0219%21 May →
mirage2–13-0.0538%20 May →
mirage13–90.0130%20 May →
dust29–130.0721%16 May →
ancient13–80.0524%16 May →
overpass3–13-0.1213%16 May →
mirage13–110.0320%14 May →
nuke12–16-0.0217%14 May →
overpass13–80.0212%13 May →
inferno13–110.0921%12 May →
inferno13–50.0543%12 May →
mirage13–90.0619%11 May →
nuke9–130.0223%11 May →
dust216–130.0216%11 May →
anubis6–13-0.0415%11 May →
mirage13–80.0422%11 May →
mirage13–110.0517%11 May →
inferno4–13-0.0916%7 May →
overpass13–70.0429%7 May →
inferno5–130.0019%7 May →
dust211–13-0.0216%7 May →
dust21–10-0.0526%6 May →
mirage13–90.0024%6 May →
overpass5–13-0.0522%6 May →
mirage18–22-0.0418%6 May →
mirage11–13-0.0429%6 May →
dust213–10-0.0027%6 May →
inferno13–10-0.0322%5 May →
mirage16–120.0524%5 May →
inferno10–130.1032%4 May →
cache13–11-0.0538%4 May →
cache13–40.0725%3 May →
cache13–70.0433%3 May →
anubis13–90.0224%3 May →
inferno13–90.0223%3 May →
nuke10–13-0.0314%3 May →
mirage13–30.1722%3 May →
inferno8–130.0033%3 May →
mirage7–13-0.0126%30 Apr →
mirage13–40.0650%29 Apr →
nuke13–70.0016%29 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0115%28 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0315%26 Apr →
overpass13–110.0311%26 Apr →
mirage13–40.0631%26 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0129%22 Apr →
anubis13–90.0417%22 Apr →
dust213–60.0730%20 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0322%19 Apr →
overpass13–70.0329%16 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0310%14 Apr →
overpass10–130.0115%13 Apr →
dust25–13-0.117%13 Apr →
mirage16–120.0416%13 Apr →
mirage9–130.0529%8 Apr →
inferno13–110.0423%8 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0417%8 Apr →
mirage13–10.0621%8 Apr →
inferno13–3-0.0435%7 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0320%6 Apr →
mirage12–16-0.0216%5 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0220%2 Apr →
mirage13–110.0120%1 Apr →
dust213–70.0718%1 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0320%31 Mar →
inferno13–70.0431%31 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0119%30 Mar →
mirage13–30.0827%30 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0420%30 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0223%29 Mar →
inferno16–14-0.0316%29 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0219%29 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0319%29 Mar →
inferno13–90.019%29 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0320%24 Mar →
vertigo6–130.1119%24 Mar →
ancient13–60.0419%24 Mar →
nuke13–100.0818%24 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.