hotdog

hotdog — CS2 Stats

US76561198196335287[U:1:236069559]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,117Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,713Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,515 -85 8 Nov – 17 Jan · 2 days played
18,51518,600peak 18,6008 Nov17 Jan
18,600Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,900Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2025-10-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,654), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.9%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy16.3%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.071.090.21 short
Match win rate45.1%46.9%48.4%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhotdogFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,900csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning50
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility3.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.0
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time623ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 4–0 · nuke, 10 Nov →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · vertigo, 7 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · vertigo, 7 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoB2211–1150%0.02
dust2C177–1041%-0.01
mirageD124–833%-0.01
trainS118–373%0.01
anubisS108–280%0.01
ancientC94–544%-0.01
nukeA85–363%0.05
overpassC73–443%-0.01
inferno—21–150%-0.01
cache—10–10%-0.04
alpine—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,597Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
2,929Matches
45.1%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
6,626MVPs
1,602Hours (in match)
1,336Bombs planted
683Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,822
AWP5,196
FAMAS1,244
P2501,238
Knife1,060

Lifetime map wins

5,529nuke
2,239inferno
1,987dust2
1,272vertigo
740train
244cbble
189lake
105office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

515Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
76.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2143%0.8615.3
Ancient1644%0.8613.3
Overpass1155%1.0216.9
Anubis10100%0.9016.5
Nuke1070%0.9413.4
Vertigo425%1.0715.5
Dust2333%0.8914.0
Inferno250%0.466.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
630msReaction time
45.3%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
5.50HE damage / grenade
7.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4713 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0130%11 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0829%9 Oct →
mirage6–3-0.0117%9 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0222%27 Sept →
anubis13–10.0128%27 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0916%27 Sept →
train13–8-0.0824%9 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0435%9 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0122%9 Aug →
anubis13–90.0327%25 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0412%25 Jul →
dust211–130.0226%28 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0419%28 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0217%28 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0625%28 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0129%22 Feb →
anubis2–110.0160%22 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0432%21 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0621%21 Feb →
dust22–13-0.0421%21 Feb →
vertigo6–13-0.0424%8 Feb →
alpine13–10-0.0116%8 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0433%7 Feb →
overpass4–13-0.0324%31 Jan →
dust213–70.0632%31 Jan →
mirage15–15-0.0423%25 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0312%24 Jan →
nuke13–40.0926%24 Jan →
train13–110.0221%17 Jan →
vertigo7–130.0322%13 Dec →
vertigo13–11-0.049%13 Nov →
overpass5–13-0.0026%13 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0928%13 Nov →
vertigo10–13-0.0217%12 Nov →
anubis9–10.0313%12 Nov →
ancient13–70.0123%12 Nov →
train13–50.0439%12 Nov →
train13–20.0423%10 Nov →
nuke4–00.120%10 Nov →
dust213–10.1132%10 Nov →
vertigo13–30.0821%10 Nov →
train13–70.0213%8 Nov →
ancient0–4-0.0510%8 Nov →
ancient12–120.0317%7 Nov →
vertigo13–30.0434%7 Nov →
vertigo0–4-0.03100%7 Nov →
train8–10.0546%7 Nov →
dust213–5-0.065%6 Nov →
nuke13–10.0530%6 Nov →
train10–13-0.0325%6 Nov →
inferno9–130.0128%5 Nov →
overpass13–60.0116%5 Nov →
train13–60.0628%5 Nov →
vertigo13–80.0424%4 Nov →
mirage13–60.0629%4 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0429%4 Nov →
anubis13–20.0132%2 Nov →
dust211–130.0026%2 Nov →
ancient13–40.0521%2 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0226%2 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0216%2 Nov →
vertigo13–110.0333%2 Nov →
overpass2–13-0.0219%2 Nov →
dust213–3-0.0512%1 Nov →
overpass13–70.055%1 Nov →
vertigo13–1-0.0424%1 Nov →
train3–60.0526%1 Nov →
vertigo13–50.1024%1 Nov →
anubis13–60.0219%1 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0231%31 Oct →
vertigo13–20.0540%31 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0016%30 Oct →
mirage13–80.0416%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0319%30 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0620%29 Oct →
anubis13–00.0222%29 Oct →
mirage6–130.0429%29 Oct →
vertigo11–40.0332%29 Oct →
nuke13–60.0830%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0520%28 Oct →
ancient13–110.0844%28 Oct →
nuke13–90.0422%28 Oct →
train13–6-0.009%28 Oct →
vertigo10–130.0228%27 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0717%27 Oct →
overpass5–130.0018%27 Oct →
train6–13-0.0026%27 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0147%26 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0413%26 Oct →
nuke2–130.0426%24 Oct →
vertigo2–13-0.0817%24 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0630%24 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0418%23 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0623%23 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0125%23 Oct →
vertigo5–130.0732%22 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0716%22 Oct →
anubis13–50.0220%22 Oct →
mirage13–70.0127%21 Oct →
dust213–90.0220%21 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.