Boddum95

Boddum95 — CS2 Stats

DK76561198191457838[U:1:231192110]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,014Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,658Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,472 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

11,524Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,472Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
67Days played since 2024-09-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,472
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.0%46.8%48.2%7.2% short
Shot accuracy15.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.191.061.07above
Match win rate45.4%46.3%46.9%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoddum95FACEITLevel 8 · 1,472 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,472csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning42
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateTLLLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −11.1pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time623ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 19 Nov →
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · mirage, 2 Apr →
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 23 Mar →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 40infernoWeakest map · 50% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA4022–1855%0.03
infernoB2412–1250%0.03
dust2B105–550%0.00
ancientB84–450%0.00
vertigo—40–40%-0.01
anubis—41–325%0.01
overpass—31–233%0.06
mirage—31–233%0.01
train—21–150%0.04
cache—10–10%0.01
grail—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,914Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3,492Matches
45.4%Match win rate
41.0%Headshot %
15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,785MVPs
1,564Hours (in match)
4,062Bombs planted
877Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,873
AWP13,969
SG 5532,242
Knife2,110
MAC-101,792
AUG1,599

Lifetime map wins

12,452nuke
9,170inferno
4,732dust2
2,179vertigo
594train
18office
10lake
9cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,278Matches
50%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
91.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno31150%1.4119.3
Nuke30468%1.4619.7
Ancient22039%1.2218.6
Dust215940%1.2218.5
Anubis6935%1.1117.8
Mirage5834%1.0115.9
Overpass5756%1.2618.0
Vertigo5147%1.1818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
629msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
6.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4277% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo12–12-0.0115%23 Sept →
cache3–130.0113%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0221%2 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0110%26 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0320%20 Jul →
inferno13–20.1517%5 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0316%4 Jul →
nuke9–130.0316%28 May →
ancient16–140.0516%24 May →
inferno10–13-0.0229%13 May →
inferno1–13-0.0825%26 Apr →
inferno13–100.0422%18 Apr →
inferno13–160.0314%12 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0328%11 Apr →
overpass14–16-0.0121%8 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0220%5 Apr →
mirage13–00.0359%2 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0443%2 Apr →
inferno4–130.1028%29 Mar →
inferno10–130.0422%29 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0424%23 Mar →
nuke13–4-0.0315%22 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0622%16 Mar →
inferno13–90.0520%15 Mar →
inferno13–30.0514%14 Mar →
nuke13–60.056%14 Mar →
nuke13–80.0243%4 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0319%4 Mar →
dust213–4-0.0410%26 Feb →
inferno13–50.0518%10 Jan →
dust216–13-0.0431%10 Jan →
nuke13–50.0616%10 Jan →
inferno13–30.0619%10 Jan →
nuke13–80.0913%10 Jan →
nuke14–160.0118%9 Jan →
mirage9–130.0824%9 Jan →
dust215–150.0632%9 Jan →
train13–50.0520%9 Jan →
inferno6–13-0.0316%9 Jan →
nuke13–70.1114%9 Jan →
nuke13–80.0822%9 Jan →
nuke14–160.0520%6 Dec →
nuke10–130.0117%7 Oct →
inferno13–40.0522%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0020%1 Oct →
overpass13–60.1417%17 Aug →
inferno13–110.0325%8 Jul →
grail13–80.0412%5 Jul →
inferno13–90.0721%2 Jul →
vertigo7–13-0.0644%12 Jun →
nuke12–12-0.0124%12 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0420%5 Jun →
inferno13–70.0211%4 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.026%12 May →
nuke11–130.0313%13 Apr →
nuke13–90.0120%1 Apr →
dust28–130.0523%5 Mar →
dust213–160.0024%26 Jan →
nuke10–130.0621%30 Dec →
nuke13–20.0831%30 Dec →
anubis3–13-0.036%27 Dec →
anubis11–13-0.0020%14 Dec →
nuke6–130.0118%14 Dec →
nuke13–110.0525%9 Dec →
nuke13–30.0221%2 Dec →
inferno13–40.0613%20 Nov →
nuke13–90.1615%19 Nov →
train4–130.0215%18 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0219%13 Nov →
ancient13–110.0510%12 Nov →
nuke13–110.0519%12 Nov →
nuke10–130.0221%11 Nov →
nuke13–50.0526%29 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0315%22 Oct →
nuke13–90.0314%22 Oct →
inferno12–120.1530%18 Oct →
vertigo4–130.0414%18 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.029%18 Oct →
nuke7–130.1018%18 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0224%15 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0117%14 Oct →
nuke13–80.0927%14 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0113%13 Oct →
nuke13–60.0414%13 Oct →
dust213–3-0.029%13 Oct →
vertigo5–130.0121%12 Oct →
nuke13–110.0545%12 Oct →
nuke11–130.0130%11 Oct →
anubis13–50.0816%11 Oct →
ancient13–70.0216%11 Oct →
overpass11–130.0520%10 Oct →
nuke13–90.1516%10 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0210%9 Oct →
inferno6–130.1514%9 Oct →
nuke5–130.0623%9 Oct →
nuke12–120.005%8 Oct →
ancient13–90.019%8 Oct →
nuke13–60.038%7 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.1250%7 Oct →
dust213–60.0743%17 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.