Koljosen James

Koljosen James — CS2 Stats

76561198184121377[U:1:223855649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,764Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,855Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,748Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,623 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 18,748 → 18,748
0Faceit ELO · 1,623 → 1,623
+114Tracked matches · now 1,764
−3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,748 +3,630 23 Jul – 22 Sept · 19 days played
14,32919,999peak 19,99923 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,623 +0 7 Sept – 22 Sept · 3 observations
1,6231,623peak 1,6237 Sept22 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,623Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,623
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,251 below peak (19,999)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,252 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.5%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy12.9%13.2%13.7%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.281.071.09above
Match win rate43.6%46.9%48.4%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKoljosen JamesFACEITLevel 9 · 1,623 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,748 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,623csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning56
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–39Last 10061%Win rateWLLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −142ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.6
Utility7.2
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time599ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 2 Aug →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · office, 24 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 8 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 18infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2111–1052%-0.02
mirageA1811–761%-0.00
ancientS1814–478%-0.01
anubisS1511–473%0.01
infernoC146–843%-0.00
nukeA95–456%-0.01
train—11–0100%-0.08
office—10–10%-0.02
eldorado—10–10%-0.14
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.02
boulder—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

113,156Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
4,587Matches
43.6%Match win rate
50.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12.9%Shot accuracy
10,374MVPs
2,862Hours (in match)
4,177Bombs planted
1,142Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,954
AWP11,999
MP92,184
P2501,981
MAC-101,699

Lifetime map wins

9,296inferno
5,104nuke
3,010dust2
1,217train
598office
347vertigo
215cbble
65safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,343Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
71.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient26559%0.9814.1
Inferno19451%0.9513.6
Nuke14543%1.0015.0
Mirage13552%0.9313.7
Anubis13044%0.9113.5
Train5862%0.9913.2
Cache2245%0.8513.1
Overpass1759%1.1013.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
9.94HE damage / grenade
9.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5366% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0117%4 Nov →
inferno14–16-0.0130%28 Oct →
anubis8–130.0225%27 Oct →
mirage19–17-0.0314%20 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0213%19 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0323%15 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0320%30 Sept →
inferno13–90.0523%30 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0415%29 Sept →
nuke13–100.0318%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0424%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0413%18 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.1818%14 Sept →
anubis13–160.0313%8 Sept →
nuke9–60.0011%6 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.1122%4 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0218%4 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.057%3 Sept →
mirage13–100.0516%2 Sept →
train13–9-0.0843%25 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0520%25 Aug →
office3–13-0.0256%24 Aug →
cache0–13-0.0619%24 Aug →
ancient13–50.0414%23 Aug →
eldorado7–9-0.146%22 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0322%20 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0422%20 Aug →
ancient13–70.0422%20 Aug →
inferno13–110.0221%19 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0320%19 Aug →
anubis13–80.0113%19 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0323%19 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0412%19 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0011%17 Aug →
cache13–80.0015%17 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.030%17 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0230%17 Aug →
fachwerk13–9-0.0225%15 Aug →
boulder13–110.0218%15 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.019%15 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0016%15 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0420%15 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0222%9 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0117%9 Aug →
nuke13–110.0123%9 Aug →
cache13–70.0318%9 Aug →
inferno13–70.0428%9 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0615%8 Aug →
ancient13–00.0936%8 Aug →
anubis13–00.0430%8 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0326%8 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0328%8 Aug →
mirage13–40.0015%8 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0122%8 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0122%8 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0221%7 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0321%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0621%7 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0218%7 Aug →
cache13–00.0050%7 Aug →
ancient13–0-0.006%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0515%6 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0118%6 Aug →
inferno13–00.0033%6 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0217%6 Aug →
anubis13–40.099%6 Aug →
mirage13–100.0225%6 Aug →
nuke13–100.0322%3 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0028%3 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0323%3 Aug →
cache13–110.0429%3 Aug →
cache10–130.0128%2 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0625%2 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0023%2 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0112%2 Aug →
ancient13–50.0017%2 Aug →
mirage13–70.0717%2 Aug →
cache0–3-0.120%2 Aug →
inferno13–50.1111%2 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0424%1 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0114%1 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0116%1 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0417%1 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0229%1 Aug →
cache13–100.0630%1 Aug →
mirage13–80.0214%31 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0316%31 Jul →
anubis13–100.0615%31 Jul →
anubis13–40.0016%28 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0721%28 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0319%28 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0321%27 Jul →
cache11–130.0416%27 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0231%27 Jul →
mirage13–60.0616%23 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0422%23 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0522%23 Jul →
cache13–2-0.0212%21 Jul →
mirage13–90.0420%21 Jul →
anubis13–110.0015%20 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.