quinton

quinton — CS2 Stats

GB76561198180484811[U:1:220219083]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

204Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,122Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,516Blue band · top ~52.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,516 +2,827 25 Jul – 12 Oct · 30 days played
6,41611,305peak 11,30525 Jul12 Oct
11,948Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-07-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 789 below peak (11,305)
  • +415 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,827 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,484 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,367), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate39.0%40.9%41.3%2.3% short
Shot accuracy18.3%14.2%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.980.950.95above
Match win rate40.1%42.1%42.6%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquintonFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER10,516 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning62
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLLWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics9.5
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time628ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 712ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 26 Jul →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · anubis, 8 Oct →
469msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · cache, 8 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3317–1652%0.02
mirageB3016–1453%-0.00
cacheB147–750%0.00
anubisA74–357%-0.01
infernoD62–433%-0.03
ancientS54–180%0.01
nukeA53–260%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,505Lifetime kills
0.98K/D · Top 50% of Level 1 players
2,676Matches
40.1%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 1 players
4,664MVPs
932Hours (in match)
2,339Bombs planted
325Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,904
AWP8,914
SSG 081,584
P2501,063
Knife779

Lifetime map wins

7,023dust2
1,927inferno
283cbble
275nuke
225office
90vertigo
67train
45safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
93.0%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
620msReaction time
63.2%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
13.36HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0510%12 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0611%11 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0217%11 Oct →
dust23–130.0018%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0716%8 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0815%8 Oct →
anubis13–70.0534%8 Oct →
ancient13–30.030%8 Oct →
dust213–40.0023%6 Oct →
anubis13–110.0814%6 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0416%6 Oct →
nuke12–50.0133%2 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0226%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0013%2 Oct →
dust212–2-0.036%2 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0811%30 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.042%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0119%30 Sept →
mirage11–130.0420%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.066%27 Sept →
mirage13–80.0813%27 Sept →
mirage13–00.0630%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.079%26 Sept →
dust26–130.0114%26 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0211%25 Sept →
dust213–20.0416%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0611%25 Sept →
cache13–110.1025%25 Sept →
dust27–12-0.049%25 Sept →
ancient11–130.0011%24 Sept →
mirage7–8-0.0411%24 Sept →
cache13–60.119%24 Sept →
cache6–13-0.038%24 Sept →
dust213–50.1420%24 Sept →
dust216–120.059%24 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0615%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0020%21 Sept →
dust25–130.0213%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.068%19 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0823%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0317%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.049%10 Sept →
dust215–150.0317%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0316%7 Sept →
dust215–150.0712%3 Sept →
cache13–60.0213%3 Sept →
dust213–70.0413%3 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0215%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.029%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.0410%3 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0917%3 Sept →
mirage6–130.002%2 Sept →
dust213–60.0232%2 Sept →
mirage13–20.0528%2 Sept →
dust213–80.0716%2 Sept →
cache16–130.1518%1 Sept →
dust23–130.0815%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0311%1 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0514%1 Sept →
dust27–130.0213%31 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0413%31 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0818%27 Aug →
mirage13–40.0721%27 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0011%21 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.107%21 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0411%21 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0116%21 Aug →
nuke13–60.0012%21 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0218%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0119%11 Aug →
dust213–6-0.089%11 Aug →
dust213–10.1127%11 Aug →
inferno13–70.0018%11 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0120%9 Aug →
dust24–130.0234%31 Jul →
dust213–80.0126%31 Jul →
dust22–130.0415%31 Jul →
mirage13–80.0417%31 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0220%31 Jul →
mirage13–50.0413%31 Jul →
inferno4–130.0733%31 Jul →
nuke7–130.0310%31 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0815%27 Jul →
dust25–130.026%27 Jul →
dust213–80.0713%27 Jul →
mirage13–80.0419%26 Jul →
mirage13–80.0012%26 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.085%26 Jul →
dust213–100.0111%26 Jul →
cache15–150.0322%26 Jul →
dust28–13-0.053%26 Jul →
dust210–40.0130%26 Jul →
dust26–00.059%26 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.046%26 Jul →
dust213–80.1723%26 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0510%26 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0422%26 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0328%26 Jul →
mirage13–60.0911%25 Jul →
mirage10–130.0320%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.