Bean

Bean — CS2 Stats

76561198177536150[U:1:217270422]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

700Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,906Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,430Top 5% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9639 of 247906 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−367Premier CS Rating · 26,797 → 26,430

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,430 -2,272 23 Dec – 1 Oct · 21 days played
25,58528,754peak 28,75423 Dec1 Oct
28,857Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2025-12-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,324 below peak (28,754)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,570 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.7%46.8%48.2%7.5% short
Shot accuracy19.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.701.061.07above
Match win rate57.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBeanFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,430 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning71
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWLTLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility2.7
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 50% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning7.1
Utility2.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels7.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time490ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 490ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 23 Dec →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · inferno, 2 Jan →
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2210–1245%0.02
cacheA159–660%0.03
anubisB136–746%0.02
ancientB115–645%0.02
mirageA117–464%0.01
overpassA116–555%0.03
dust2C83–538%0.01
nukeC83–538%0.03
rooftop—11–0100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,583Lifetime kills
1.70K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
2,158Matches
57.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players
40.7%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
8,997MVPs
1,150Hours (in match)
3,718Bombs planted
942Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,124
AWP15,149
P2501,920
Tec-91,239
SSG 081,189
P90983

Lifetime map wins

6,241inferno
2,865dust2
910cbble
866nuke
763train
437vertigo
95office
27lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

193Matches
57%Win rate
1.51Avg K/D
60.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis475%1.6923.0
Overpass250%1.8227.5
Inferno10%0.8612.0
Ancient10%1.0619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
52.1%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
6.4°Preaim
490msReaction time
71.0%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
0.5%Flash assists
8.83HE damage / grenade
2.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4347 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0617%1 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0512%1 Oct →
ancient15–150.015%1 Oct →
anubis5–130.0018%1 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0229%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0414%30 Sept →
cache13–70.0431%29 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0211%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.0515%29 Sept →
ancient10–130.0319%29 Sept →
mirage5–00.0640%29 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0819%29 Sept →
anubis9–130.0215%28 Sept →
cache13–50.0729%28 Sept →
mirage13–50.0044%27 Sept →
cache13–20.1215%27 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0021%27 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.026%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0123%27 Sept →
cache4–130.049%27 Sept →
mirage13–100.0914%27 Sept →
anubis8–130.0010%26 Sept →
cache0–13-0.020%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0514%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.0623%26 Sept →
ancient13–160.009%25 Sept →
anubis16–130.0219%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0924%25 Sept →
dust213–70.1456%25 Sept →
anubis13–50.0834%25 Sept →
cache13–10.0341%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0229%24 Sept →
anubis16–140.0717%24 Sept →
cache13–110.049%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0222%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0216%23 Sept →
anubis11–130.0516%23 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0218%11 Sept →
ancient11–130.0619%11 Sept →
inferno13–80.0435%11 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0042%11 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.1222%8 Sept →
cache13–100.0531%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.0330%7 Sept →
inferno13–100.1419%7 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0728%7 Sept →
cache13–90.0213%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.0423%7 Sept →
cache12–120.0541%7 Sept →
cache13–80.0926%12 May →
anubis13–40.0817%30 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0317%11 Feb →
ancient16–130.074%24 Jan →
overpass13–100.0612%24 Jan →
inferno13–80.1119%24 Jan →
anubis13–60.0420%24 Jan →
anubis10–130.0313%24 Jan →
overpass13–70.0629%24 Jan →
anubis10–130.0323%23 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0129%13 Jan →
overpass7–13-0.0120%12 Jan →
overpass16–130.0111%11 Jan →
nuke13–90.0523%11 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0117%10 Jan →
ancient13–80.0524%10 Jan →
inferno13–80.0716%10 Jan →
overpass16–140.0614%9 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.0028%8 Jan →
overpass11–130.0320%8 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0914%8 Jan →
nuke13–80.0320%8 Jan →
dust26–13-0.0121%8 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0610%8 Jan →
dust210–130.0124%8 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0312%8 Jan →
mirage13–60.0220%7 Jan →
ancient13–110.0511%3 Jan →
overpass13–40.1317%3 Jan →
inferno10–130.0213%3 Jan →
overpass11–130.0410%2 Jan →
inferno12–16-0.0030%2 Jan →
inferno13–70.0129%2 Jan →
inferno2–9-0.218%2 Jan →
inferno3–9-0.1164%2 Jan →
inferno9–20.0928%2 Jan →
overpass13–9-0.0137%2 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0025%2 Jan →
inferno6–13-0.0025%2 Jan →
nuke11–130.0020%1 Jan →
inferno11–130.0630%29 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.0227%29 Dec →
overpass15–15-0.0032%24 Dec →
mirage13–110.0625%23 Dec →
nuke8–80.0416%23 Dec →
inferno9–30.1962%23 Dec →
inferno9–30.0128%23 Dec →
rooftop9–10.1833%23 Dec →
nuke14–160.0214%23 Dec →
ancient11–130.0318%23 Dec →
overpass4–13-0.0411%23 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.