Twice East Activate It ™

Twice East Activate It ™ — CS2 Stats

BT76561198173196597[U:1:212930869]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

985Tracked matches67%Win rate2025Tracked since
813Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,664Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,544 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,664 -7,945 24 Aug – 11 Nov · 26 days played
18,66427,806peak 27,80624 Aug11 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,544 +0 2 Sept – 2 Nov · 4 observations
1,5441,544peak 1,5442 Sept2 Nov
28,306Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,544Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,544
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 207 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 9,142 below peak (27,806)
  • -7,726 over 30 days · declining
  • -7,945 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,336 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate23.9%43.8%44.8%20.9% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.481.021.03above
Match win rate59.8%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTwice East Activate It ™FACEITLevel 5 · 1,544 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,664 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,544csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning58
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +92ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics2.6
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time431ms−89ms
first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 431ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 26 Sept →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 14 Jul →
242msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 14 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3011–1937%-0.06
mirageA1912–763%-0.02
infernoD144–1029%-0.03
ancientS128–467%0.02
anubisB115–645%-0.03
nukeA85–363%0.01
cacheS65–183%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,334Lifetime kills
1.48K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
1,095Matches
59.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
23.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,963MVPs
500Hours (in match)
1,688Bombs planted
383Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,779dust2
1,855inferno
1,307nuke
226train
100italy
100office
100aztec
100dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

512Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
83.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust216051%0.8914.8
Mirage9954%0.9715.6
Inferno7951%0.8614.5
Ancient6749%0.9416.3
Nuke4753%0.8815.1
Anubis3850%0.8213.5
Cache812%0.9214.6
Train757%0.9112.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
61.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
433msReaction time
61.5%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
14.96HE damage / grenade
12.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.160%11 Nov →
nuke3–13-0.040%11 Nov →
anubis0–13-0.0826%10 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0813%10 Nov →
nuke13–4-0.0114%8 Nov →
anubis2–130.0050%8 Nov →
cache13–11-0.078%8 Nov →
nuke11–130.1415%23 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0211%23 Oct →
anubis10–30.0213%23 Oct →
ancient5–30.0811%23 Oct →
nuke13–90.1426%23 Oct →
inferno13–40.036%21 Oct →
cache13–30.0116%21 Oct →
ancient10–130.0515%21 Oct →
anubis13–50.0612%19 Oct →
mirage13–60.0630%19 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0817%18 Oct →
ancient13–70.0413%17 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0513%17 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.064%15 Oct →
dust213–9-0.1117%14 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.069%14 Oct →
dust25–13-0.077%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0313%11 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0816%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.2243%26 Sept →
ancient13–20.1032%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.1632%26 Sept →
dust23–130.0632%26 Sept →
mirage0–10-0.0117%26 Sept →
ancient13–90.1228%26 Sept →
inferno5–130.059%25 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0013%12 Sept →
cache13–40.0016%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0922%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1036%5 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0721%5 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.1125%3 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1120%3 Sept →
inferno2–6-0.0911%3 Sept →
dust23–13-0.117%3 Sept →
dust213–5-0.116%2 Sept →
dust28–13-0.1018%2 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0426%2 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0514%2 Sept →
inferno0–2-0.030%2 Sept →
nuke13–0-0.054%2 Sept →
inferno1–6-0.110%2 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0640%2 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0115%2 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0217%2 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0517%2 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0717%2 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0815%1 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0721%1 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0421%1 Sept →
dust26–13-0.025%1 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.040%1 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0520%31 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.060%31 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.038%31 Aug →
nuke6–1-0.0410%31 Aug →
anubis9–1-0.0420%31 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0219%31 Aug →
mirage0–4-0.140%30 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.1013%30 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.1020%30 Aug →
dust210–13-0.1622%30 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0711%30 Aug →
dust213–7-0.024%30 Aug →
dust210–13-0.1133%30 Aug →
dust23–13-0.090%29 Aug →
dust213–7-0.1343%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0518%29 Aug →
mirage3–0-0.0225%29 Aug →
dust213–0-0.0233%24 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.074%24 Aug →
ancient16–140.0120%24 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0123%18 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.068%17 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0013%14 Aug →
dust212–16-0.1129%11 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.065%11 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0312%10 Aug →
mirage13–50.097%9 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0825%4 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.019%2 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0516%21 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.019%18 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0515%18 Jul →
ancient13–00.0611%16 Jul →
anubis13–10.0719%16 Jul →
dust20–13-0.080%16 Jul →
dust28–0-0.0238%16 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0421%15 Jul →
cache13–40.0242%14 Jul →
dust27–130.0355%14 Jul →
inferno13–00.1127%14 Jul →
dust213–30.0531%10 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.