FeitaN[1]

FeitaN[1] — CS2 Stats

FI76561198171316990[U:1:211051262]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,870Tracked matches76%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,947Top 5% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6795 of 259985 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,947 +98 6 Mar – 21 Oct · 4 days played
26,58626,947peak 26,9476 Mar21 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,845 +0 31 Aug – 19 Sept · 2 observations
2,8452,845peak 2,84531 Aug19 Sept
27,064Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,845Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2025-12-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,845
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 155 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,947
  • +361 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,053 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFeitaN[1]PREMIER26,947 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,845csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning64
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–36–2Last 10062%Win rateLWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility7.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time568ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 30 Apr →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 5–2 · nuke, 24 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 25 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 6 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 54% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%0.00
nukeA2011–955%-0.00
dust2A169–756%0.01
mirageB137–654%0.01
ancientS118–373%-0.00
cacheS86–275%0.04
anubisA74–357%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%0.06
train—22–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (54% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,775Matches
57%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
75.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno11260%1.2415.3
Ancient11051%0.9814.9
Nuke10461%1.1615.5
Dust29151%1.0914.9
Mirage8746%1.0715.2
Train3367%1.1215.4
Anubis2343%0.9013.5
Overpass1275%1.0513.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
578msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.3%Flash assists
11.24HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.374% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0518%21 Oct →
ancient13–50.0615%21 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0419%21 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0624%24 Sept →
nuke5–2-0.0745%24 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.036%24 Sept →
cache13–40.1327%30 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0538%21 Aug →
cache13–90.0123%21 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0226%15 Aug →
dust213–20.0136%15 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0021%15 Aug →
nuke13–90.0434%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0234%15 Aug →
ancient13–20.0319%14 Aug →
mirage8–20.0619%14 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0017%9 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0711%24 May →
cache3–130.0215%24 May →
nuke13–90.1029%24 May →
ancient13–80.0017%9 May →
cache13–80.0328%30 Apr →
inferno13–60.1133%30 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0117%30 Apr →
nuke11–130.0219%30 Apr →
cache12–120.0129%30 Apr →
cache13–30.1324%30 Apr →
cache13–110.0326%30 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0745%26 Apr →
cache13–7-0.0123%26 Apr →
inferno11–130.0326%26 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0231%26 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0314%25 Apr →
dust215–150.0522%27 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0423%27 Mar →
dust213–8-0.0229%13 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.0319%12 Mar →
mirage13–70.0725%12 Mar →
nuke14–160.0213%12 Mar →
overpass13–40.0114%12 Mar →
mirage11–130.0123%12 Mar →
dust213–110.0120%6 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0418%6 Mar →
anubis5–70.0642%6 Mar →
overpass13–70.1113%6 Mar →
inferno13–4-0.0525%6 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0228%6 Mar →
mirage13–50.0620%6 Mar →
dust213–160.0131%6 Mar →
nuke13–100.0122%6 Mar →
inferno13–70.0431%6 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0236%15 Feb →
mirage13–160.0116%15 Feb →
nuke13–100.0121%14 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.0118%14 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0317%8 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0417%8 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0019%7 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0517%6 Feb →
anubis13–40.0720%6 Feb →
dust210–130.0316%6 Feb →
inferno13–20.0228%6 Feb →
ancient16–14-0.0220%6 Feb →
dust213–10.0921%6 Feb →
ancient14–16-0.0228%5 Feb →
inferno13–5-0.0339%1 Feb →
nuke13–160.0019%1 Feb →
inferno16–13-0.0023%1 Feb →
inferno13–80.0324%1 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0118%1 Feb →
inferno16–130.0723%31 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0539%30 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0130%30 Jan →
nuke13–8-0.0318%30 Jan →
anubis13–60.0317%29 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0611%29 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0011%29 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0021%25 Jan →
inferno13–90.0120%25 Jan →
inferno13–60.0323%24 Jan →
dust213–30.0829%24 Jan →
nuke13–110.0820%24 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0228%23 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0312%23 Jan →
anubis13–8-0.0516%23 Jan →
dust213–80.0126%23 Jan →
inferno13–60.0616%23 Jan →
nuke8–130.0116%16 Jan →
anubis13–11-0.0129%12 Jan →
ancient13–50.0521%11 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0330%11 Jan →
mirage11–130.0218%10 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0124%4 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0427%3 Jan →
train13–50.0631%2 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0318%1 Jan →
nuke13–70.0324%1 Jan →
train16–13-0.0337%1 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0137%31 Dec →
inferno13–70.0216%31 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.