SnacKo

SnacKo — CS2 Stats

AU76561198170653887[U:1:210388159]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

880Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,002Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 +2,848 19 Aug – 14 Oct · 26 days played
7,15110,816peak 10,81619 Aug14 Oct
11,151Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 817 below peak (10,816)
  • +520 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate41.9%39.9%42.0%meets
Shot accuracy2.5%7.0%9.6%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.780.920.980.20 short
Match win rate28.9%42.3%43.8%14.9% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnacKoPREMIER9,999 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning59
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.9
Utility4.5
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time576ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 8–13 · mirage, 13 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · nuke, 4 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · inferno, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB199–1047%-0.03
cacheB189–950%-0.03
dust2B178–947%-0.04
nukeA1610–663%-0.04
anubisD124–833%-0.02
infernoB84–450%-0.00
mirageB84–450%-0.01
shelter—10–10%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,702Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
2,024Matches
28.9%Match win rate
41.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
2.5%Shot accuracy
2,407MVPs
517Hours (in match)
1,396Bombs planted
146Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,646nuke
1,636inferno
1,634dust2
510vertigo
244office
77train
48ar_shoots
40ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
71.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
566msReaction time
53.8%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0123%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0014%14 Oct →
inferno13–50.0123%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0818%13 Oct →
nuke13–110.0816%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0213%13 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0312%13 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0014%13 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0515%11 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0922%11 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0216%10 Oct →
cache13–80.029%10 Oct →
inferno10–130.0413%10 Oct →
shelter12–12-0.0119%9 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0512%9 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0423%9 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.059%9 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0214%8 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0913%8 Oct →
nuke13–80.0011%7 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0219%6 Oct →
mirage13–160.0114%6 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0415%6 Oct →
office9–13-0.005%4 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0441%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.067%4 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0413%4 Oct →
dust213–8-0.018%4 Oct →
dust27–130.0219%4 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0214%4 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0610%4 Oct →
mirage13–0-0.0511%4 Oct →
ancient9–130.0017%3 Oct →
mirage13–30.018%3 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0810%3 Oct →
ancient13–1-0.0718%3 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0813%3 Oct →
cache11–0-0.068%3 Oct →
nuke6–130.0114%3 Oct →
cache13–100.0017%3 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0426%2 Oct →
anubis13–40.0323%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0118%2 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0214%2 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0416%2 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.054%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0819%2 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0616%2 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0513%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0121%1 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0715%1 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.079%16 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0011%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0218%15 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0122%15 Sept →
ancient8–130.008%14 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.250%14 Sept →
inferno8–80.0216%14 Sept →
inferno9–60.0424%14 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.1216%14 Sept →
inferno9–30.0730%14 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.087%14 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0219%14 Sept →
dust213–90.0613%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0727%14 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.026%13 Sept →
cache7–13-0.039%11 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0624%11 Sept →
dust213–11-0.078%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0420%10 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0118%10 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0518%10 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0316%9 Sept →
cache15–15-0.069%9 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.077%9 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.075%8 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0413%7 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0414%7 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0318%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0315%6 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0412%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0419%6 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0213%6 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0327%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0120%5 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0714%5 Sept →
anubis13–30.0323%5 Sept →
nuke13–20.0413%5 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0016%5 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0226%5 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0314%4 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0713%4 Sept →
anubis13–10.0510%4 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1324%3 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0118%3 Sept →
dust213–40.0130%3 Sept →
anubis16–130.0017%19 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0713%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.