zAmps ✞

zAmps ✞ — CS2 Stats

BR76561198168781585[U:1:208515857]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,224Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,590Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,051Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21627 of 261620 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−343Premier CS Rating · 25,394 → 25,051

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,051 +684 29 Jun – 14 Nov · 36 days played
22,93525,503peak 25,50329 Jun14 Nov
25,503Peak Premier in tracked matches
58Days played since 2026-06-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 452 below peak (25,503)
  • +1,352 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,592 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,949 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.5%48.2%50.9%5.5% short
Shot accuracy14.0%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.921.071.090.17 short
Match win rate48.6%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzAmps ✞FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,051 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning62
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +131ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.2
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time564ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 10–13 · inferno, 21 Oct →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 27 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 21 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2414–1058%0.01
dust2C198–1142%0.02
ancientA159–660%0.00
mirageB136–746%-0.00
nukeS118–373%0.00
anubisC104–640%-0.03
infernoD72–529%0.06
train—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

152,207Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
5,676Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
45.5%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12,651MVPs
3,263Hours (in match)
5,513Bombs planted
1,533Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,482
AWP17,790
P2502,533
P902,097
Knife2,032

Lifetime map wins

10,504dust2
6,194inferno
3,760nuke
1,649train
1,252vertigo
977cbble
46office
17aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

675Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214155%1.1516.4
Mirage13950%1.0315.5
Ancient11347%1.1016.1
Nuke7253%1.1717.6
Anubis7046%1.1016.0
Cache6560%1.2719.1
Inferno4151%1.0916.2
Train1258%1.1717.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
570msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
7.98HE damage / grenade
16.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0029%14 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0715%12 Nov →
cache13–110.0523%11 Nov →
ancient13–80.0123%11 Nov →
dust213–110.0333%11 Nov →
cache13–50.0429%10 Nov →
dust213–90.0920%9 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0523%5 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.069%4 Nov →
dust213–50.0424%2 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0215%2 Nov →
cache8–13-0.0117%2 Nov →
dust212–160.0114%31 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0127%26 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0110%26 Oct →
nuke13–40.0414%23 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0016%23 Oct →
mirage13–60.088%21 Oct →
inferno10–130.2847%21 Oct →
ancient13–80.1323%20 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0629%20 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0023%18 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0621%18 Oct →
ancient11–130.0524%18 Oct →
nuke13–90.0328%18 Oct →
cache14–160.0023%17 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0318%17 Oct →
cache9–130.0626%14 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0115%14 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0222%14 Oct →
ancient14–160.0121%12 Oct →
cache13–110.0227%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0411%5 Oct →
anubis13–80.0115%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0425%5 Oct →
nuke13–40.0334%5 Oct →
inferno14–160.0224%29 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0316%29 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0231%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0048%27 Sept →
anubis13–0-0.0122%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0235%14 Sept →
inferno8–130.0634%11 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0041%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0636%8 Sept →
dust213–40.0321%8 Sept →
cache8–130.0430%7 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0323%3 Sept →
inferno13–20.0931%2 Sept →
cache13–80.0122%2 Sept →
dust213–20.1226%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0323%30 Aug →
mirage16–140.0119%27 Aug →
ancient13–20.0430%24 Aug →
mirage9–130.0231%23 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0117%19 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0319%18 Aug →
cache13–60.0619%18 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0226%18 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0640%17 Aug →
train13–110.0316%16 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0835%16 Aug →
cache13–110.0222%16 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0115%11 Aug →
ancient13–90.0426%11 Aug →
cache13–2-0.0317%10 Aug →
nuke13–10.0327%10 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0410%3 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0222%2 Aug →
dust211–130.0720%2 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0816%30 Jul →
dust27–130.0212%26 Jul →
inferno9–130.0214%25 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0114%21 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0216%20 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0729%20 Jul →
nuke15–150.0324%19 Jul →
dust213–50.1025%19 Jul →
cache13–60.0525%19 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0914%19 Jul →
ancient13–100.0348%19 Jul →
nuke13–90.0529%18 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0125%17 Jul →
dust213–90.0414%13 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0518%13 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0215%12 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0536%12 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0638%11 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0510%11 Jul →
cache11–130.0630%11 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0123%10 Jul →
mirage7–130.0219%9 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0024%9 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0015%9 Jul →
cache13–110.0131%9 Jul →
inferno13–110.0218%2 Jul →
dust215–150.0329%29 Jun →
dust28–130.0028%29 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0221%26 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0413%26 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.