LukaDayum

LukaDayum — CS2 Stats

HR76561198167867739[U:1:207602011]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

875Tracked matches69%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,154Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,023Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43989 of 261660 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,023 +2,532 20 Aug – 4 Nov · 38 days played
20,00023,023peak 23,02320 Aug4 Nov
23,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-08-20

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,023
  • +2,047 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,532 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,977 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,777), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate36.1%44.8%45.7%9.6% short
Shot accuracy12.5%12.4%12.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.831.031.05above
Match win rate50.3%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLukaDayumFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,023 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning66
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +10.1pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.6
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time498ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 458ms → last ⅓ avg 498ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · fachwerk, 3 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · cache, 11 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 20 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2312–1152%-0.00
dust2A159–660%0.01
ancientC146–843%-0.01
cacheA138–562%0.02
anubisD82–625%0.01
infernoB84–450%0.02
nukeB63–350%0.03
fachwerk—32–167%0.07
shelter—21–150%0.03
office—21–150%0.09
vertigo—20–20%0.04
boulder—21–150%0.10
rush_001—11–0100%0.14
overpass—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,400Lifetime kills
1.83K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
3,156Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
36.1%Headshot %
12.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
7,773MVPs
1,077Hours (in match)
2,489Bombs planted
804Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP19,264
AK-4712,778
SSG 082,925
SG 5532,768
P902,311
AUG2,275

Lifetime map wins

6,679dust2
5,082inferno
1,760nuke
1,171vertigo
551train
364office
134cbble
128italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches
56%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
83.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
42%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21457%1.1218.0
Mirage1060%1.5722.5
Anubis888%1.2116.5
Ancient40%1.0119.3
Cache250%1.9814.5
Inferno20%0.7311.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
485msReaction time
43.4%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
5.87HE damage / grenade
4.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3672 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.1514%10 Nov →
anubis13–40.0218%4 Nov →
ancient13–6-0.0432%4 Nov →
mirage13–90.0215%1 Nov →
cache16–120.0118%24 Oct →
mirage13–110.0418%14 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0331%14 Oct →
dust22–10-0.0714%11 Oct →
cache13–60.1012%11 Oct →
cache13–40.0150%11 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0213%11 Oct →
mirage5–8-0.055%11 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0013%7 Oct →
ancient13–110.0213%7 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0516%6 Oct →
mirage15–150.0116%5 Oct →
dust216–140.0114%4 Oct →
shelter13–100.0512%3 Oct →
office13–90.0910%3 Oct →
fachwerk13–50.1711%3 Oct →
rush_0015–10.1443%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0119%2 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0115%2 Oct →
inferno13–50.0534%30 Sept →
dust22–4-0.0025%28 Sept →
nuke13–60.0312%28 Sept →
dust28–130.0119%28 Sept →
ancient2–10.0922%28 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0417%27 Sept →
cache13–30.0922%27 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0220%27 Sept →
ancient7–130.014%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.065%26 Sept →
anubis9–130.0513%26 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0114%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0414%26 Sept →
anubis9–130.0214%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.039%25 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.069%25 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0223%25 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0616%25 Sept →
inferno10–130.0326%25 Sept →
cache6–9-0.0119%24 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0310%24 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0416%23 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0117%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0510%22 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.068%22 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0326%22 Sept →
cache13–80.1118%21 Sept →
mirage10–130.0013%21 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.036%20 Sept →
ancient5–130.016%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0517%20 Sept →
mirage13–50.0429%20 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0416%20 Sept →
dust213–30.0915%20 Sept →
boulder6–130.0621%18 Sept →
fachwerk10–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
office6–130.0824%18 Sept →
overpass13–40.1317%16 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0914%16 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0128%14 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0325%13 Sept →
nuke13–60.059%13 Sept →
boulder13–70.1415%13 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0318%13 Sept →
dust213–50.0116%13 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.066%13 Sept →
fachwerk13–50.0713%11 Sept →
shelter7–130.004%11 Sept →
nuke8–130.0018%11 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0320%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0311%10 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0020%9 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.029%9 Sept →
mirage13–40.1123%9 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0321%6 Sept →
anubis3–130.0317%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0416%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.077%6 Sept →
ancient13–160.0114%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.0114%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.039%5 Sept →
nuke13–70.0818%3 Sept →
dust213–60.0514%2 Sept →
mirage15–150.005%2 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0517%29 Aug →
inferno9–70.049%29 Aug →
nuke7–90.078%29 Aug →
cache10–130.0122%29 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0112%29 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0314%27 Aug →
ancient12–160.068%27 Aug →
mirage13–30.0230%27 Aug →
inferno13–50.0814%26 Aug →
anubis13–10.0517%25 Aug →
inferno11–130.0117%25 Aug →
ancient11–130.0116%24 Aug →
cache13–5-0.029%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.