ZukoZoo

ZukoZoo — CS2 Stats

US76561198156986257[U:1:196720529]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,237Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,632Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,917Top 50% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57617 of 260215 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (28 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,917 +1,918 8 Aug – 10 Oct · 23 days played
19,99922,789peak 22,7898 Aug10 Oct
23,040Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-08-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 872 below peak (22,789)
  • +1,382 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,083 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate38.9%45.7%46.8%7.9% short
Shot accuracy14.1%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.821.051.060.24 short
Match win rate49.3%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZukoZooFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,917 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning50
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWWWTLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +74ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time593ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 31 Aug →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 25 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · mirage, 2 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10cacheWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2914–1548%-0.01
cacheC187–1139%-0.02
dust2B136–746%-0.02
infernoS108–280%-0.00
nukeS107–370%0.01
ancientA106–460%-0.01
anubisS96–367%0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

102,662Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
7,965Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
38.9%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
10,717MVPs
2,302Hours (in match)
4,655Bombs planted
1,606Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,791
AWP14,488
P2503,260
Negev2,100
P901,833

Lifetime map wins

9,589dust2
6,115inferno
2,770nuke
1,054train
740cbble
735vertigo
199office
127lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

132Matches
58%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
77.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2658%1.1115.1
Anubis1354%1.3917.6
Cache1242%0.9213.3
Inferno1283%1.4817.3
Dust2956%0.9413.8
Nuke850%1.4918.4
Ancient757%1.1212.3
Train10%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
89.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
585msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.5203% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0713%25 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0215%25 Oct →
anubis13–80.0416%25 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0217%22 Oct →
cache5–130.0514%22 Oct →
nuke13–30.0310%10 Oct →
nuke10–130.0015%10 Oct →
dust26–130.0015%10 Oct →
inferno13–50.0618%10 Oct →
ancient13–70.0116%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0513%5 Oct →
overpass13–70.0414%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0821%2 Oct →
cache13–6-0.033%2 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.105%2 Oct →
anubis13–80.0411%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0331%29 Sept →
mirage13–40.0616%29 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0312%28 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0410%28 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0614%28 Sept →
mirage13–110.0025%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0325%26 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0135%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.0924%26 Sept →
cache13–11-0.057%24 Sept →
dust213–60.0116%24 Sept →
cache11–130.0414%24 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0227%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0312%22 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0617%21 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.1017%20 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0610%20 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0523%20 Sept →
nuke13–110.0028%20 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0320%17 Sept →
nuke13–10.009%17 Sept →
mirage13–10.0426%17 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0525%17 Sept →
inferno13–110.017%16 Sept →
mirage13–160.0016%16 Sept →
mirage13–40.0935%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0416%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0115%8 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0410%8 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0231%8 Sept →
mirage19–170.0618%1 Sept →
nuke13–40.1030%31 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0715%31 Aug →
nuke13–70.0825%29 Aug →
mirage19–17-0.0310%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0721%29 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0318%29 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0119%29 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0333%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0021%29 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.1113%29 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0113%29 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0113%29 Aug →
cache13–60.0018%29 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0118%28 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.048%28 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0417%28 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0612%28 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0122%28 Aug →
mirage13–40.0126%28 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0131%27 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0510%27 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0410%27 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0730%27 Aug →
mirage14–160.0114%27 Aug →
mirage13–10.1022%27 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0325%26 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0413%26 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0228%25 Aug →
cache11–130.0137%25 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0211%24 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0611%24 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0311%20 Aug →
anubis13–160.0318%18 Aug →
mirage13–60.0612%18 Aug →
ancient13–100.0828%17 Aug →
mirage13–40.0211%17 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0325%17 Aug →
ancient13–40.0111%17 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0029%16 Aug →
cache5–13-0.037%16 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0428%11 Aug →
mirage6–130.0012%11 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0212%10 Aug →
nuke16–130.0412%10 Aug →
mirage9–130.0124%10 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0511%10 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0318%10 Aug →
mirage13–20.0215%10 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0116%8 Aug →
inferno13–20.0923%8 Aug →
cache4–13-0.017%8 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0512%8 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0116%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.