The Australian Stallion

The Australian Stallion — CS2 Stats

76561198156823458[U:1:196557730]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,260Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,242Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,861Blue band · top ~39.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+342Premier CS Rating · 12,519 → 12,861

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,861 +3,072 12 May – 28 Oct · 35 days played
5,32413,521peak 13,52112 May28 Oct
13,727Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2026-05-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 660 below peak (13,521)
  • +925 over 30 days · improving
  • -660 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,139 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate36.6%42.7%43.8%7.1% short
Shot accuracy9.9%11.2%12.0%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.880.991.020.14 short
Match win rate49.4%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe Australian StallionFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,861 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning70
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateWLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −9.5pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.3
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.0
Utility3.3
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 12–2 · ancient, 27 Jun →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 18 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · cache, 16 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
2–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2910–1934%-0.02
nukeS1711–665%0.01
cacheA1610–663%-0.01
ancientC167–944%0.00
dust2D103–730%-0.02
anubisD50–50%0.00
inferno—41–325%0.02
overpass—22–0100%-0.02
office—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,801Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
2,347Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
36.6%Headshot %
9.9%Shot accuracy
6,761MVPs
715Hours (in match)
1,992Bombs planted
791Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP10,430
AK-477,737
MP9606
Knife505

Lifetime map wins

3,400inferno
2,652nuke
1,403vertigo
1,338dust2
144train
36office
14lake
11cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

58Matches
41%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
65.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1638%0.9013.6
Mirage1443%0.7011.8
Anubis729%0.7913.0
Nuke771%1.1513.3
Dust2617%0.7011.5
Inferno333%1.1617.7
Overpass333%0.8414.3
Vertigo1100%0.6210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
521msReaction time
65.9%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.60HE damage / grenade
3.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3578 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0218%28 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0323%27 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0419%26 Oct →
nuke13–40.0538%26 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0211%24 Oct →
ancient13–100.0619%24 Oct →
cache4–13-0.076%22 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0714%22 Oct →
dust213–100.0110%21 Oct →
mirage13–100.0027%21 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0322%18 Oct →
nuke3–0-0.04100%18 Oct →
anubis6–130.0218%17 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0514%17 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.1325%17 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0619%17 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0115%17 Oct →
nuke7–130.0424%16 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0522%16 Oct →
nuke13–40.1023%14 Oct →
mirage7–130.039%14 Oct →
dust26–13-0.038%13 Oct →
cache13–10.0743%13 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0221%8 Oct →
ancient8–130.0411%8 Oct →
inferno13–100.0828%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0326%4 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0027%4 Oct →
mirage11–130.0114%3 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.1116%3 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0131%2 Oct →
nuke13–30.0318%2 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0211%2 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.056%1 Oct →
mirage15–150.0034%27 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0118%27 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0332%4 Aug →
mirage6–130.0016%3 Aug →
inferno9–130.0433%2 Aug →
anubis11–130.0350%2 Aug →
dust213–30.0017%2 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0036%30 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0235%30 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0810%29 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0314%28 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0210%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0319%26 Jul →
mirage12–120.0623%25 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0013%25 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0111%25 Jul →
cache3–13-0.059%25 Jul →
mirage13–60.0415%24 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0516%24 Jul →
mirage13–90.0416%24 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0116%21 Jul →
mirage11–130.0229%21 Jul →
ancient13–30.0617%18 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0327%18 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0922%5 Jul →
ancient10–130.0430%5 Jul →
nuke13–80.0319%4 Jul →
ancient13–100.0214%3 Jul →
nuke15–150.0222%3 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0617%2 Jul →
nuke13–50.0339%2 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0715%30 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.005%27 Jun →
ancient12–20.1030%27 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0217%27 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0319%26 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0617%26 Jun →
inferno4–130.0215%25 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0324%24 Jun →
cache7–130.0021%24 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0710%23 Jun →
nuke13–30.0229%22 Jun →
mirage16–13-0.0111%20 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0027%20 Jun →
cache13–50.0815%18 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0619%18 Jun →
nuke11–130.0018%18 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0715%16 Jun →
ancient8–130.0010%15 Jun →
dust24–13-0.033%9 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.109%6 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0122%19 May →
mirage7–13-0.0419%19 May →
mirage13–110.0224%19 May →
ancient13–40.0620%19 May →
mirage2–130.0236%17 May →
nuke2–13-0.0514%15 May →
dust211–130.0116%15 May →
ancient10–130.0219%15 May →
mirage6–13-0.0211%14 May →
overpass13–9-0.0529%14 May →
office13–7-0.0225%14 May →
anubis10–130.0323%13 May →
mirage13–100.059%12 May →
mirage9–13-0.0521%12 May →
overpass13–80.0016%12 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.