Padschino

Padschino — CS2 Stats

76561198150404503[U:1:190138775]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,864Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,004Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,563Blue band · top ~36% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,563 -850 31 Aug – 30 Oct · 31 days played
13,56321,777peak 21,77731 Aug30 Oct
21,777Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 8,214 below peak (21,777)
  • -6,970 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,437 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate35.8%42.0%44.4%8.6% short
Shot accuracy10.4%9.6%11.9%1.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.790.981.030.24 short
Match win rate43.7%43.8%45.2%1.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPadschinoPREMIER13,563 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning66
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–40–4Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time536ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy10.6%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 10.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 16 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 1 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 18 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8mirageWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2717–1063%0.02
mirageD174–1324%0.00
ancientB179–853%0.01
dust2S139–469%0.01
anubisS87–188%0.05
cacheC73–443%0.00
nukeS64–267%0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
office—10–10%-0.06
eldorado—11–0100%0.16
poseidon—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,865Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
2,480Matches
43.7%Match win rate
35.8%Headshot %
10.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
4,949MVPs
1,074Hours (in match)
3,863Bombs planted
634Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,229inferno
3,591dust2
1,754nuke
1,088vertigo
415train
147office
55cbble
40italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

229Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
67.8ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4060%1.0014.6
Ancient3342%0.8811.1
Anubis2654%0.8212.6
Vertigo1650%0.9615.1
Mirage1631%0.8712.3
Nuke1656%0.8510.5
Overpass1377%0.8312.2
Dust2560%0.7210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.0%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
532msReaction time
64.0%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
14.92HE damage / grenade
6.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.0157% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4832 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office3–13-0.068%30 Oct →
cache13–20.0714%30 Oct →
mirage13–70.0412%22 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.048%22 Oct →
inferno13–40.0512%20 Oct →
dust216–140.0920%20 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0213%19 Oct →
cache7–13-0.045%19 Oct →
inferno13–00.030%19 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.046%18 Oct →
ancient13–70.057%18 Oct →
dust213–16-0.029%18 Oct →
dust213–60.025%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0315%18 Oct →
anubis13–100.114%18 Oct →
cache10–130.038%18 Oct →
mirage8–130.0716%17 Oct →
inferno9–70.0315%17 Oct →
vertigo5–9-0.1520%17 Oct →
vertigo9–30.1111%16 Oct →
inferno9–10.2219%16 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.133%16 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.018%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0410%15 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.045%15 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0313%15 Oct →
anubis16–120.0110%14 Oct →
ancient13–20.062%13 Oct →
inferno16–130.0412%13 Oct →
nuke13–90.0711%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0215%13 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0311%12 Oct →
inferno9–50.0421%12 Oct →
inferno10–130.0510%12 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0313%12 Oct →
ancient13–70.059%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0412%10 Oct →
mirage1–130.017%9 Oct →
inferno13–80.0612%9 Oct →
anubis13–110.1317%9 Oct →
inferno16–130.059%9 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0013%9 Oct →
cache13–4-0.018%9 Oct →
inferno9–50.0222%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0127%7 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0412%7 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0432%7 Oct →
inferno9–50.1242%6 Oct →
inferno0–9-0.190%6 Oct →
anubis13–100.0619%6 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0519%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0117%5 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0026%5 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0310%5 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.047%5 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0218%4 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0817%4 Oct →
ancient16–140.0310%4 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0215%4 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0211%3 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0220%3 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0524%2 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0310%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0113%2 Oct →
mirage5–130.0221%2 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0015%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0118%2 Oct →
inferno9–10.1944%1 Oct →
cache15–150.0015%1 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0125%1 Oct →
ancient13–50.0325%1 Oct →
mirage8–130.0410%19 Sept →
anubis13–160.0013%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0620%18 Sept →
inferno8–130.0921%18 Sept →
ancient13–100.029%18 Sept →
dust215–150.045%18 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.008%17 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.089%16 Sept →
ancient6–130.083%16 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0112%16 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.029%15 Sept →
dust213–110.016%15 Sept →
mirage6–130.0312%14 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0010%14 Sept →
anubis13–40.045%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.039%13 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0110%13 Sept →
inferno13–110.0113%12 Sept →
inferno9–40.0639%12 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0330%11 Sept →
eldorado9–20.165%11 Sept →
poseidon9–60.0216%11 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0113%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0313%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0413%11 Sept →
mirage13–90.0420%11 Sept →
dust213–40.0011%10 Sept →
inferno13–70.0315%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.028%10 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.