Nuc

Nuc — CS2 Stats

76561198149256794[U:1:188991066]Steam profile ↗2 game bans

463Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,047Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,188Blue band · top ~48.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−172Premier CS Rating · 11,360 → 11,188

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,188 +1,695 15 Sept – 31 Oct · 30 days played
9,23113,414peak 13,41415 Sept31 Oct
13,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,226 below peak (13,414)
  • +1,070 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,812 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate31.7%41.8%42.7%11.0% short
Shot accuracy16.0%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.230.980.99above
Match win rate44.1%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNucFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,188 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning64
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility3.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time551ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 20 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 30 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 7 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 14nukeWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2212–1055%0.03
mirageA1810–856%0.02
anubisC146–843%0.01
ancientA148–657%-0.01
nukeC125–742%-0.02
infernoA116–555%0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,166Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
2,806Matches
44.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
31.7%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
6,177MVPs
1,047Hours (in match)
1,941Bombs planted
618Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP13,746
AK-478,866
SSG 081,827
P901,665
MP71,356
Negev1,275

Lifetime map wins

7,994dust2
2,136inferno
712nuke
524lake
256vertigo
222train
205office
130cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches
29%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
79.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

11%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage743%1.0917.3
Dust2540%0.8210.4
Ancient30%0.7813.7
Nuke20%0.8212.0
Cache1100%1.6418.0
Anubis10%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
556msReaction time
55.7%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
13.98HE damage / grenade
3.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3905 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0310%31 Oct →
dust25–130.0312%31 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.078%30 Oct →
dust213–20.0340%30 Oct →
inferno13–70.0416%29 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0323%29 Oct →
dust27–130.0320%28 Oct →
inferno0–6-0.130%25 Oct →
anubis13–80.0115%25 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0311%25 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.037%25 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0517%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0528%24 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0225%24 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.029%24 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0331%24 Oct →
nuke13–50.0118%23 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0511%22 Oct →
dust26–130.0112%22 Oct →
mirage13–90.0012%22 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0515%22 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0223%18 Oct →
anubis10–130.0323%17 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0611%17 Oct →
mirage1–130.017%16 Oct →
dust22–00.000%16 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0114%16 Oct →
anubis7–10.0025%16 Oct →
dust211–130.0524%16 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0238%16 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0623%16 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0624%16 Oct →
mirage8–130.0117%15 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0415%15 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0322%14 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0111%14 Oct →
anubis10–130.0632%14 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0322%14 Oct →
ancient4–130.0331%14 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0218%14 Oct →
ancient13–80.0413%14 Oct →
cache13–80.0418%14 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0120%14 Oct →
anubis9–130.0110%14 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0325%12 Oct →
anubis13–90.0426%11 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.1219%11 Oct →
mirage13–100.0220%10 Oct →
dust213–30.0217%10 Oct →
ancient13–100.0113%10 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0117%10 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0111%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.0524%10 Oct →
dust213–50.0524%9 Oct →
cache15–150.0121%9 Oct →
anubis13–60.0215%9 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.028%9 Oct →
inferno3–90.0916%7 Oct →
dust213–80.1119%7 Oct →
mirage9–130.0411%7 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.019%6 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0511%6 Oct →
cache3–130.0012%6 Oct →
dust213–60.0419%6 Oct →
ancient13–90.0210%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.067%29 Sept →
dust29–130.0324%29 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.019%29 Sept →
dust213–90.0931%29 Sept →
inferno16–140.0316%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.0632%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0122%28 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0218%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0212%28 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0719%28 Sept →
cache4–13-0.048%27 Sept →
dust26–130.0614%27 Sept →
inferno13–80.0011%27 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.008%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.036%23 Sept →
dust213–70.0817%23 Sept →
cache13–90.037%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0514%22 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0210%22 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.1121%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0624%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0429%21 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0411%21 Sept →
mirage16–140.0416%21 Sept →
mirage13–60.1320%21 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0218%21 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.048%21 Sept →
inferno9–30.1513%20 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0613%20 Sept →
anubis13–70.0222%20 Sept →
ancient6–130.029%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0516%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0311%17 Sept →
mirage13–50.1118%15 Sept →
mirage9–130.0828%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.