CRIMZONT

CRIMZONT — CS2 Stats

CL76561198142710007[U:1:182444279]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,437Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,577Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#34868 of 261660 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,577 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,823 -1,666 13 Jan – 2 May · 26 days played
22,48025,852peak 25,85213 Jan2 May
25,852Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,577Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-01-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,577
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 174 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,878), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate42.8%46.8%48.2%5.4% short
Shot accuracy4.2%13.0%13.2%9.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.061.07above
Match win rate25.1%46.3%46.9%21.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCRIMZONTFACEITLevel 8 · 1,577 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,577csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning50
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.0
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time561ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 30 Jan →
27%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 25 Jan →
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · mirage, 16 May →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 18 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 47% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3416–1847%0.03
mirageA3218–1456%0.01
infernoA148–657%0.01
anubisB63–350%0.04
nukeA53–260%0.00
ancient—42–250%0.02
overpass—31–233%-0.01
train—11–0100%-0.02
cache—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,120Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,042Matches
25.1%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
4.2%Shot accuracy
7,012MVPs
1,630Hours (in match)
3,208Bombs planted
836Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,160
AWP10,080
MP91,841
MAC-101,686
AUG1,540
SSG 081,366

Lifetime map wins

7,171dust2
4,402inferno
1,312nuke
1,287vertigo
670train
95cbble
74safehouse
66office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

440Matches
49%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
81.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust213353%1.1615.5
Inferno8456%1.2717.1
Mirage8244%1.2016.1
Anubis8052%1.2615.8
Ancient2832%1.1315.0
Nuke1839%1.1116.7
Overpass650%0.9715.2
Vertigo520%0.9813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
553msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
8.72HE damage / grenade
14.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2937% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0313%1 Nov →
train13–2-0.0222%28 Aug →
inferno13–60.1219%20 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0215%2 Jul →
dust23–130.0319%27 Jun →
dust212–120.0417%26 Jun →
mirage13–10.065%18 Jun →
dust213–40.0413%18 Jun →
mirage13–100.0212%12 Jun →
mirage11–130.0614%11 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0117%16 May →
cache13–30.0421%16 May →
dust212–120.1414%16 May →
mirage13–30.0915%16 May →
mirage11–13-0.0211%11 May →
dust28–130.0920%8 May →
mirage13–11-0.0117%2 May →
dust213–90.0011%30 Apr →
inferno1–130.014%26 Apr →
overpass4–13-0.0719%26 Apr →
dust213–40.0319%25 Apr →
anubis13–100.0720%25 Apr →
dust213–80.1314%25 Apr →
dust21–13-0.0715%25 Apr →
inferno9–130.0113%25 Apr →
dust213–80.0613%25 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0012%25 Apr →
mirage11–130.0024%21 Apr →
dust29–11-0.0414%18 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0321%12 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0626%9 Apr →
dust213–60.0426%9 Apr →
mirage0–13-0.060%8 Apr →
nuke13–50.0727%8 Apr →
dust21–13-0.048%5 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0615%5 Apr →
inferno13–90.1416%4 Apr →
dust213–90.1219%4 Apr →
dust28–130.009%3 Apr →
mirage13–60.047%2 Apr →
anubis12–120.1116%2 Apr →
inferno9–130.0322%29 Mar →
mirage5–1-0.0810%29 Mar →
dust29–130.0424%29 Mar →
mirage7–130.0122%26 Mar →
inferno13–50.0119%28 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0324%26 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.004%22 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0220%20 Feb →
dust213–90.0111%13 Feb →
dust213–40.019%13 Feb →
anubis15–150.0310%13 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.048%13 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0311%10 Feb →
mirage13–80.0918%9 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0315%5 Feb →
dust213–80.0510%5 Feb →
inferno4–13-0.0412%5 Feb →
mirage13–30.0418%4 Feb →
dust213–100.0616%4 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0026%4 Feb →
inferno13–40.0115%3 Feb →
anubis13–50.0419%2 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.038%2 Feb →
dust216–120.046%1 Feb →
mirage12–16-0.0018%1 Feb →
mirage3–10-0.0219%31 Jan →
dust213–40.0123%30 Jan →
mirage1–13-0.075%30 Jan →
dust213–30.2418%30 Jan →
mirage13–16-0.048%30 Jan →
mirage13–50.0510%29 Jan →
mirage10–130.038%29 Jan →
dust24–13-0.0418%28 Jan →
mirage13–10.0210%27 Jan →
dust212–120.0112%27 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0213%26 Jan →
mirage13–90.0119%26 Jan →
overpass11–13-0.026%26 Jan →
ancient13–40.047%25 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0527%25 Jan →
inferno13–20.0011%25 Jan →
ancient15–150.0318%25 Jan →
overpass13–50.059%25 Jan →
dust213–90.0210%25 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.043%25 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0410%25 Jan →
dust213–40.1325%24 Jan →
inferno13–8-0.0011%24 Jan →
ancient13–90.0210%24 Jan →
dust28–130.017%23 Jan →
dust26–13-0.0127%23 Jan →
anubis13–110.0320%23 Jan →
mirage9–20.0317%22 Jan →
mirage13–90.0525%22 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0219%22 Jan →
mirage13–50.0918%19 Jan →
dust28–130.0221%15 Jan →
nuke13–90.0524%13 Jan →
mirage13–80.0220%11 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.