ム LK — CS2 Stats

GB76561198142706629[U:1:182440901]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

372Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,597Hours in CS56Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#46564 of 259900 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+106Tracked matches · now 372

−2.8ppWin rate · 62.1% → 59.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,747 +0 23 Aug – 18 Sept · 4 days played

22,747Peak Premier in tracked matches

29Days played since 2026-08-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	44.4%	44.8%	45.7%	1.3% short
Shot accuracy	16.3%	12.4%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.92	1.03	1.05	0.13 short
Match win rate	46.0%	45.2%	45.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning63

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateTWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · −87ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–3–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 31%
Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

5–4–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 27%
Avg reaction 468ms

Last 20

11–7–2 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility4.3

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning6.3

Utility4.3

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels5.9

Win Impact8.1

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time512ms−26ms

first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms

Headshot accuracy23.2%−4.0%

first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–5 · poseidon, 1 Sept →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 27 Sept →

250msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · dust2, 25 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · cache, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	68	40–28	59%	0.01
mirage	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
dust2	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
ancient	S	5	4–1	80%	0.02
poseidon	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
debris	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.10
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,736Lifetime kills

0.92K/D

4,293Matches

46.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players

44.4%Headshot %

16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players

15,317MVPs

1,924Hours (in match)

3,724Bombs planted

1,061Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,401

AWP12,118

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,845

Desert Eagle6,779

P2000 / USP-S4,080

Glock-182,148

Tec-91,906

UMP-451,684

Five-SeveN1,464

P2501,271

Lifetime map wins

2,939inferno

2,724train

1,882dust2

1,562cbble

1,506nuke

949office

415lake

266assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

229Matches

51%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

82.3ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	19	53%	0.97	15.2
Ancient	10	80%	1.13	18.8
Cache	7	57%	1.37	17.7
Dust2	7	57%	1.34	17.9
Anubis	5	40%	1.00	14.2
Nuke	4	75%	1.56	16.8
Inferno	1	100%	1.43	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy

38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

86.3%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

518msReaction time

42.9%T opening success

64.4%CT opening success

0.34Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

9.67HE damage / grenade

5.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3412 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	12–12	0.04	48%	4 Nov →
cache	13–9	0.00	25%	4 Nov →
cache	10–13	0.04	20%	3 Nov →
inferno	4–13	0.05	29%	2 Nov →
debris	4–9	-0.07	35%	2 Nov →
cache	5–13	-0.09	19%	2 Nov →
cache	13–5	0.08	18%	30 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.04	30%	30 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.02	14%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.01	34%	29 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.05	21%	29 Oct →
cache	12–12	-0.05	14%	29 Oct →
poseidon	9–4	-0.05	25%	29 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.11	28%	29 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.01	28%	29 Oct →
nuke	9–6	-0.02	16%	29 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.05	19%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	25%	27 Oct →
cache	13–1	0.03	28%	27 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.02	14%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	19%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.00	33%	26 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.10	33%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.06	12%	25 Oct →
dust2	0–4	-0.07	0%	25 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.02	38%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.10	21%	25 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.01	21%	23 Oct →
cache	12–12	0.02	21%	23 Oct →
cache	9–13	0.00	19%	22 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	17%	22 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.03	20%	22 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.12	22%	22 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.00	27%	21 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.05	14%	20 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.00	11%	20 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.02	23%	20 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.03	16%	20 Oct →
cache	4–13	0.00	31%	20 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.07	10%	19 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.04	18%	17 Oct →
poseidon	9–5	0.03	41%	17 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.02	18%	16 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.02	19%	16 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.02	18%	14 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	20%	9 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.02	25%	9 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.00	41%	30 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.15	40%	30 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.06	30%	27 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.01	39%	27 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.09	43%	27 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.05	50%	27 Sept →
cache	13–6	-0.01	20%	27 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.04	26%	26 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.06	26%	26 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.00	47%	26 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.01	14%	26 Sept →
cache	12–12	-0.03	18%	26 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.04	16%	25 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.08	31%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	26%	25 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.07	31%	25 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.06	11%	25 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.03	13%	24 Sept →
cache	13–5	-0.02	18%	24 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.07	28%	24 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.03	21%	24 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.07	30%	24 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.01	13%	24 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.04	24%	12 Sept →
cache	0–3	0.02	50%	12 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.05	28%	12 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.04	7%	10 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.04	24%	10 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.05	43%	10 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.02	32%	2 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.02	19%	2 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.00	34%	1 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.07	45%	1 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.05	30%	1 Sept →
poseidon	9–5	0.16	23%	1 Sept →
cache	3–13	0.01	21%	31 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	23%	31 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.00	42%	31 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.01	5%	31 Aug →
debris	3–9	-0.12	29%	31 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	20%	31 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	13%	31 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.05	24%	31 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	33%	28 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	37%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	26%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.04	29%	28 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	29%	28 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.01	23%	28 Aug →
poseidon	3–9	-0.09	44%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.02	41%	23 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.01	27%	23 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	11%	23 Aug →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-up Model AccuracyPrediction model accuracy stats Team Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utility CS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGL CS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem