Kuzco

Kuzco — CS2 Stats

AU76561198139289915[U:1:179024187]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,745Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,005Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,708Top 25% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24852 of 251515 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,314 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,708 +1,451 9 Aug – 11 Oct · 30 days played
20,33424,876peak 24,8769 Aug11 Oct
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,314Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,314
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 37 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 168 below peak (24,876)
  • +3,690 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 292 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.6%46.8%48.2%4.7% short
Shot accuracy8.3%13.0%13.3%5.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.07meets
Match win rate42.4%46.3%46.9%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKuzcoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,314 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,708 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,314csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning56
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.6
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time575ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 8 Sept →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 28 Aug →
430msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 8 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2110–1148%0.01
nukeC188–1044%0.01
dust2B179–853%-0.01
ancientS1611–569%0.01
anubisD124–833%0.01
infernoS86–275%0.02
cacheC73–443%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,529Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
3,925Matches
42.4%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot %
8.3%Shot accuracy
8,724MVPs
2,065Hours (in match)
2,999Bombs planted
901Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,790
AWP8,358
MAC-101,961
MP91,239
FAMAS1,237
P901,082

Lifetime map wins

7,856dust2
5,495inferno
3,072nuke
570vertigo
543train
291cbble
44office
33lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

241Matches
54%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5648%1.0414.9
Dust23358%1.1416.2
Inferno3077%1.1516.0
Ancient2662%1.2316.0
Cache2152%1.0713.6
Anubis1844%1.0617.7
Nuke1741%1.0117.6
Vertigo450%1.4817.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
558msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
9.61HE damage / grenade
11.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7926% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0730%11 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0032%11 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0511%11 Oct →
anubis11–130.0324%11 Oct →
ancient13–70.0915%10 Oct →
ancient13–70.049%10 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0618%10 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0814%10 Oct →
mirage14–160.0816%8 Oct →
inferno11–130.0715%8 Oct →
mirage7–130.0316%7 Oct →
nuke13–90.0521%7 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0012%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0215%1 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0317%1 Oct →
nuke13–100.0612%1 Oct →
mirage13–00.0225%1 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0116%1 Oct →
cache7–130.0115%30 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.078%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0325%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0119%27 Sept →
dust213–20.0124%27 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0510%27 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0218%27 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.069%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0918%26 Sept →
mirage8–2-0.0124%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0218%26 Sept →
ancient13–60.0128%26 Sept →
nuke13–50.0224%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0217%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0325%26 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0618%25 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0515%23 Sept →
anubis9–130.0112%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0324%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0819%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.0026%20 Sept →
anubis13–70.0521%20 Sept →
cache11–130.0615%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.0222%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0423%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.079%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.0918%14 Sept →
cache13–80.0028%14 Sept →
inferno13–70.0322%13 Sept →
dust213–70.0429%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0322%13 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0212%10 Sept →
dust213–40.0117%10 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0130%10 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0219%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.1718%8 Sept →
inferno13–10.026%7 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0120%7 Sept →
mirage10–130.0622%4 Sept →
cache13–90.0229%4 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0126%4 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0322%2 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0322%30 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0730%30 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0229%30 Aug →
nuke10–130.0025%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.1327%29 Aug →
dust213–50.0515%29 Aug →
nuke4–130.0016%29 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0417%28 Aug →
inferno13–100.0016%28 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0248%28 Aug →
anubis4–130.0015%28 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0030%28 Aug →
mirage13–100.0030%27 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0318%27 Aug →
nuke10–130.0428%27 Aug →
nuke6–130.0718%26 Aug →
ancient8–130.0417%26 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0232%25 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0121%25 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0340%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0126%23 Aug →
dust23–130.0116%22 Aug →
ancient13–70.0625%22 Aug →
nuke13–110.0013%22 Aug →
anubis9–130.0321%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0716%21 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0319%19 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0116%16 Aug →
nuke13–70.0731%16 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0221%16 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0223%16 Aug →
ancient13–60.0314%14 Aug →
nuke7–130.0121%14 Aug →
vertigo9–13-0.0224%14 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0640%14 Aug →
nuke9–130.0121%9 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0021%9 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0130%9 Aug →
mirage9–130.0213%9 Aug →
ancient13–50.0413%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.