SheLuhDavid

SheLuhDavid — CS2 Stats

76561198133998173[U:1:173732445]Steam profile ↗VAC banned · 1 game ban

701Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,491Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,368Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94341 of 259088 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−74Premier CS Rating · 19,442 → 19,368
+7Tracked matches · now 701
−6.9ppWin rate · 48.3% → 41.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,368 +2,550 1 Sept – 31 Oct · 24 days played
16,81821,816peak 21,8161 Sept31 Oct
22,166Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,448 below peak (21,816)
  • +1,729 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 632 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate45.1%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy13.3%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.900.950.980.08 short
Match win rate34.3%42.6%43.3%9.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSheLuhDavidFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER19,368 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning46
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 42% on T to 21% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time523ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 26 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · nuke, 31 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 20 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2714–1352%-0.01
dust2A2213–959%0.02
anubisC135–838%-0.02
cacheS118–373%0.02
nukeA95–456%-0.00
ancientC94–544%-0.01
infernoD93–633%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,674Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,016Matches
34.3%Match win rate
45.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
3,310MVPs
925Hours (in match)
1,224Bombs planted
288Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,617
AWP4,584
Negev1,953
Knife666

Lifetime map wins

4,743dust2
937inferno
679nuke
318vertigo
251train
155lake
97cbble
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
517msReaction time
41.5%T opening success
20.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
12.06HE damage / grenade
5.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 20.786% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0314%31 Oct →
nuke6–00.0644%31 Oct →
anubis12–160.0221%31 Oct →
anubis11–130.0118%30 Oct →
cache13–90.1116%30 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0513%30 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0627%30 Oct →
ancient10–130.0115%29 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.048%29 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0714%29 Oct →
mirage13–60.0928%29 Oct →
cache13–90.0226%29 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.039%28 Oct →
cache10–10.1124%28 Oct →
inferno8–130.0331%26 Oct →
ancient13–100.1233%26 Oct →
dust28–130.0021%26 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0222%25 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0817%25 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0520%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.0128%23 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0631%23 Oct →
dust213–80.0122%23 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.066%23 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0421%23 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0113%22 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0741%22 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0412%22 Oct →
anubis13–110.0427%22 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0317%21 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0425%21 Oct →
dust213–60.0512%21 Oct →
mirage8–130.0526%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0121%20 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0313%20 Oct →
inferno13–80.0825%20 Oct →
anubis16–140.0314%19 Oct →
mirage13–80.0319%19 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.1023%19 Oct →
mirage4–2-0.0413%18 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0121%18 Oct →
inferno11–130.0421%17 Oct →
dust213–60.0918%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.0613%16 Oct →
dust213–40.0316%16 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0615%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.0617%16 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0618%15 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0819%15 Oct →
dust213–110.1115%15 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0331%15 Oct →
nuke13–70.010%15 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0230%15 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.1035%15 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0010%15 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0414%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0218%15 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0419%15 Oct →
dust213–70.0311%14 Oct →
dust216–120.0422%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0619%14 Oct →
dust210–130.0627%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0419%13 Oct →
ancient13–70.0129%13 Oct →
inferno8–130.0026%13 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0839%13 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0335%12 Oct →
anubis9–130.0225%12 Oct →
nuke13–100.0818%12 Oct →
dust22–7-0.0422%12 Oct →
dust214–160.0124%9 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0211%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0411%8 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0616%8 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0221%8 Oct →
dust213–40.0131%8 Oct →
anubis15–150.0312%8 Oct →
cache10–130.0039%8 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0620%8 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0015%8 Oct →
dust213–60.0416%8 Oct →
cache13–00.0219%8 Oct →
mirage15–150.0822%8 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0019%7 Oct →
mirage2–130.0427%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0817%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0426%7 Oct →
cache8–10.0625%7 Oct →
ancient11–3-0.0022%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0418%7 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0311%7 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0311%7 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.1120%7 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0215%7 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0114%7 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0022%7 Oct →
mirage13–100.0413%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0315%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0014%6 Oct →
mirage9–130.0018%6 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.