SheLuhDavid

SheLuhDavid — CS2 Stats

76561198133998173[U:1:173732445]Steam profile ↗VAC banned · 1 game ban

631Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,441Hours in CS58Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,482Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89638 of 251136 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−269Premier CS Rating · 19,751 → 19,482

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,482 +2,664 1 Sept – 9 Oct · 21 days played
16,49419,751peak 19,7511 Sept9 Oct
19,803Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 269 below peak (19,751)
  • +2,629 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 518 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches138——
Win rate48%——
K/D0.89——
Headshot %54%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,923), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate44.8%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy13.8%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.900.950.980.08 short
Match win rate33.7%42.6%43.3%9.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSheLuhDavidFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER19,482 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning61
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–48–6Last 10046%Win rateLTWWWWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time577ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 23 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · nuke, 1 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2911–1838%0.00
dust2C238–1535%-0.01
cacheB137–654%0.01
nukeB137–654%-0.01
infernoB84–450%0.02
ancientA74–357%0.00
anubisS64–267%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,492Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
1,949Matches
33.7%Match win rate
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
3,150MVPs
891Hours (in match)
1,127Bombs planted
269Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,998
AWP4,510
Negev1,953
Knife664

Lifetime map wins

4,587dust2
864inferno
617nuke
318vertigo
251train
155lake
97cbble
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
588msReaction time
59.6%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
5.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2105% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust214–160.0124%9 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0211%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0411%8 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0616%8 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0221%8 Oct →
dust213–40.0131%8 Oct →
anubis15–150.0312%8 Oct →
cache10–130.0039%8 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0620%8 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0015%8 Oct →
dust213–60.0416%8 Oct →
cache13–00.0219%8 Oct →
mirage15–150.0822%8 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0019%7 Oct →
mirage2–130.0427%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0817%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0426%7 Oct →
cache8–10.0625%7 Oct →
ancient11–3-0.0022%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0418%7 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0311%7 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0311%7 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.1120%7 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0215%7 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0114%7 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0022%7 Oct →
mirage13–100.0413%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0315%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0014%6 Oct →
mirage9–130.0018%6 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0038%6 Oct →
inferno15–150.0421%6 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0526%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0043%5 Oct →
mirage13–40.0126%5 Oct →
cache11–130.0918%5 Oct →
dust216–130.0519%5 Oct →
dust215–150.0124%5 Oct →
anubis13–30.0913%5 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0516%4 Oct →
cache13–8-0.048%4 Oct →
nuke12–160.0122%4 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0715%3 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0314%3 Oct →
cache9–130.0217%3 Oct →
dust210–130.0517%3 Oct →
mirage13–30.0122%3 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1015%2 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0114%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0421%2 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0124%2 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0313%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0022%1 Oct →
mirage0–4-0.070%1 Oct →
dust22–11-0.0717%1 Oct →
nuke10–0-0.0550%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0617%1 Oct →
cache13–90.0231%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0410%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.0321%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0728%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0127%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0613%1 Oct →
dust27–130.0327%30 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0525%30 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0319%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0026%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.009%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0316%30 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.039%29 Sept →
ancient9–130.0526%29 Sept →
dust27–130.0321%28 Sept →
mirage5–130.0224%28 Sept →
cache13–70.0220%28 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0420%28 Sept →
mirage10–130.0212%28 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0119%28 Sept →
nuke16–120.029%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.019%27 Sept →
dust26–13-0.019%25 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.029%24 Sept →
dust213–70.0625%24 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0333%24 Sept →
inferno6–00.1117%24 Sept →
dust29–130.0120%24 Sept →
mirage16–140.0219%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0133%24 Sept →
anubis16–130.0725%24 Sept →
nuke13–60.1323%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0913%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0318%23 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0424%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.085%23 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0117%22 Sept →
ancient13–110.1013%22 Sept →
inferno13–110.0015%21 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0118%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0420%21 Sept →
cache6–130.0530%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.0125%20 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.