GLUESNIFFER — CS2 Stats

76561198302554470[U:1:342288742]✓ No bans

619Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,625Blue band · top ~35.7% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−289Premier CS Rating · 13,914 → 13,625

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,625 +2,036 4 Sept – 9 Oct · 27 days played
11,58914,501peak 14,5014 Sept9 Oct
14,501Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 876 below peak (14,501)
  • +725 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,375 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGLUESNIFFERPREMIER13,625 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning66
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLTWWTWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels2.3

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time583ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 1 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · mirage, 1 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · mirage, 1 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3112–1939%-0.01
mirageB2813–1546%-0.01
ancientC114–736%-0.01
nukeA117–464%-0.01
cacheC73–443%-0.00
anubisD62–433%0.02
infernoS64–267%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
577msReaction time
54.2%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
16.4%Flash assists
13.60HE damage / grenade
3.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4194 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust214–16-0.0420%9 Oct →
dust215–150.0120%9 Oct →
mirage13–50.0217%8 Oct →
ancient13–50.0512%8 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.026%8 Oct →
dust213–60.0115%7 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0225%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.009%7 Oct →
cache8–10.0636%7 Oct →
ancient11–3-0.0514%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0315%7 Oct →
anubis11–130.048%7 Oct →
nuke13–110.0021%7 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0720%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0215%6 Oct →
nuke13–110.0112%6 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0413%3 Oct →
dust210–130.0017%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0612%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.047%1 Oct →
mirage0–40.0038%1 Oct →
dust22–11-0.0116%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.1314%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0914%1 Oct →
dust27–130.0214%30 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0214%30 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0410%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0120%30 Sept →
cache13–90.0012%29 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0412%29 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0222%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0221%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0615%28 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0517%28 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0514%28 Sept →
inferno6–130.0013%28 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0019%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0811%27 Sept →
anubis13–50.1325%27 Sept →
dust26–130.0222%25 Sept →
ancient15–150.0124%24 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0210%24 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0215%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0328%24 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0018%24 Sept →
nuke13–60.0019%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0421%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0314%23 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.039%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0213%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0016%22 Sept →
ancient13–110.0020%22 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0020%21 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0812%21 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0419%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0118%21 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0412%21 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0721%20 Sept →
dust213–90.0018%20 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0518%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0422%19 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.039%19 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0420%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0023%18 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0513%18 Sept →
mirage4–70.0919%17 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0419%17 Sept →
mirage13–00.1015%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0614%17 Sept →
dust213–40.0717%16 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0114%16 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0621%16 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0030%16 Sept →
dust213–10.0115%16 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0013%15 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0033%15 Sept →
dust213–80.0722%15 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0416%15 Sept →
anubis7–130.0315%15 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0313%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0413%14 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0616%14 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0613%14 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0015%13 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0213%13 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0118%13 Sept →
nuke13–80.0116%13 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.096%13 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0321%11 Sept →
dust213–110.0219%11 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0211%10 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0114%10 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.047%10 Sept →
cache13–10.0636%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0426%9 Sept →
ancient9–130.0123%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0226%9 Sept →
dust210–13-0.055%8 Sept →
ancient13–80.0415%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.