Skooma dog

Skooma dog — CS2 Stats

IL76561198132944830[U:1:172679102]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

659Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,917Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (46 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+9Tracked matches · now 659
−2.4ppWin rate · 66.7% → 64.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,707 +1,098 21 Jun – 28 Jun · 5 days played
17,60918,936peak 18,93621 Jun28 Jun
18,936Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-05-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.5%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy14.4%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.181.071.09above
Match win rate45.7%46.9%48.4%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSkooma dogFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning61
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–32–7Last 10061%Win rateTLLWWTLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time543ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 11 May →
76%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · warden, 8 Jun →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 4 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · warden, 27 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

wardenBest map · 100% over 15dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2211–1150%0.00
wardenS1515–0100%0.04
nukeB126–650%0.02
dust2D93–633%0.02
infernoS96–367%0.02
boulderS75–271%0.00
mirageC73–443%0.04
anubisA53–260%0.02
ancient—42–250%0.02
train—33–0100%0.00
fachwerk—31–233%0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.09
office—11–0100%0.04
shelter—11–0100%0.06
vertigo—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,254Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
2,731Matches
45.7%Match win rate
52.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,345MVPs
915Hours (in match)
1,742Bombs planted
404Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,596inferno
2,612dust2
1,481train
1,313nuke
579office
491vertigo
165cbble
139lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
58%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
83.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1173%1.7519.6
Anubis1080%1.3020.4
Inferno757%1.3412.9
Dust2667%1.1619.2
Nuke1100%1.1317.0
Ancient1100%0.8612.0
Overpass10%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
541msReaction time
48.6%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.84HE damage / grenade
8.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4424 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–150.0014%4 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0515%4 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0417%29 Oct →
anubis13–110.0315%29 Oct →
dust213–40.0229%21 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0316%18 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0316%27 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0036%27 Sept →
inferno13–100.0638%22 Sept →
cache13–110.0922%10 Sept →
anubis13–40.0721%31 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0133%31 Aug →
overpass13–60.0929%30 Aug →
boulder13–7-0.0118%30 Aug →
inferno13–20.007%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0524%30 Aug →
cache13–90.0618%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0215%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0915%26 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0222%24 Aug →
mirage13–70.1225%19 Aug →
anubis13–90.0425%19 Aug →
office13–80.0429%19 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0128%15 Aug →
inferno13–80.0328%15 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0723%14 Aug →
train13–90.0335%9 Aug →
boulder13–50.0728%9 Aug →
inferno7–130.0119%4 Aug →
dust213–20.0232%4 Aug →
train13–5-0.0113%4 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0126%4 Aug →
nuke13–30.1019%4 Aug →
boulder11–13-0.0014%3 Aug →
nuke13–50.0727%3 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0226%24 Jul →
boulder8–13-0.027%24 Jul →
shelter13–40.0625%21 Jul →
boulder13–4-0.0222%21 Jul →
fachwerk6–130.0028%21 Jul →
fachwerk13–30.0123%20 Jul →
boulder7–10.0250%20 Jul →
fachwerk12–120.0422%17 Jul →
boulder13–7-0.0223%17 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0121%10 Jul →
inferno13–30.1114%10 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0011%28 Jun →
mirage9–130.0419%28 Jun →
nuke15–150.0123%24 Jun →
mirage13–20.0614%24 Jun →
dust27–130.0616%24 Jun →
inferno13–30.0710%23 Jun →
ancient5–130.0015%23 Jun →
dust210–130.0021%23 Jun →
inferno16–12-0.0327%22 Jun →
vertigo8–130.0427%21 Jun →
nuke13–110.0517%21 Jun →
mirage3–130.0123%17 Jun →
cache11–13-0.0023%15 Jun →
nuke13–80.0838%15 Jun →
nuke13–110.0230%14 Jun →
cache12–120.0542%14 Jun →
warden13–7-0.0027%14 Jun →
warden13–20.1126%10 Jun →
warden13–90.0529%10 Jun →
warden13–70.0729%10 Jun →
nuke12–120.0532%9 Jun →
warden13–80.0724%9 Jun →
warden13–60.0817%9 Jun →
warden13–70.0520%8 Jun →
warden13–30.0176%8 Jun →
cache3–13-0.0222%8 Jun →
cache13–7-0.0223%7 Jun →
warden13–5-0.0532%2 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0427%2 Jun →
nuke13–60.0026%2 Jun →
warden13–40.1118%31 May →
dust213–10-0.0426%28 May →
warden13–60.0615%28 May →
ancient7–13-0.0215%27 May →
warden13–10.0241%27 May →
cache4–13-0.0515%27 May →
train13–10-0.0215%23 May →
cache13–110.0013%23 May →
ancient13–10-0.0119%20 May →
cache13–110.0237%20 May →
dust29–130.1124%16 May →
mirage8–20.0050%16 May →
cache8–13-0.0121%16 May →
cache13–70.0127%14 May →
cache13–8-0.0432%13 May →
cache13–100.0326%11 May →
warden13–100.0241%11 May →
cache13–20.1427%11 May →
warden13–90.0449%10 May →
cache13–70.0113%10 May →
warden13–3-0.0018%10 May →
cache10–13-0.0418%6 May →
cache12–120.0124%5 May →
cache4–130.0132%4 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.