Gamgie

Gamgie — CS2 Stats

PS76561198132277473[U:1:172011745]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,487Tracked matches35%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,259Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,235Top 50% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#96624 of 260210 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,235 -3,781 19 Jul – 4 Nov · 14 days played
19,23523,231peak 23,23119 Jul4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 879 +0 29 Aug – 12 Sept · 4 observations
879879peak 87929 Aug12 Sept
23,447Peak Premier in tracked matches
879Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,996 below peak (23,231)
  • -3,219 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 765 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches10——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.74——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 30 Oct 2026 → 7 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.5%44.8%45.7%2.1% short
Shot accuracy1.5%12.4%12.7%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.031.050.16 short
Match win rate41.9%45.2%45.7%3.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGamgieFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,235 · Purple bandPEAK ELO879csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning44
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY31–58–11Last 10031%Win rateLLWLWLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time591ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 25 Sept →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 12 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 27 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 44% over 9mirageWeakest map · 17% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD234–1917%-0.02
dust2C218–1338%-0.02
nukeD133–1023%-0.01
cacheD122–1017%-0.02
ancientD113–827%-0.02
anubisC94–544%0.00
inferno—32–167%-0.03
train—32–167%-0.00
vertigo—22–0100%0.02
office—11–0100%-0.02
overpass—10–10%0.08
fachwerk—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,511Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
1,775Matches
41.9%Match win rate
43.5%Headshot %
1.5%Shot accuracy
2,628MVPs
801Hours (in match)
1,972Bombs planted
321Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,946nuke
2,233dust2
1,298inferno
750vertigo
393office
390train
10italy
8cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
77.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2236%0.8814.5
Nuke1182%1.1414.4
Ancient933%1.0613.6
Cache850%1.0315.0
Dust2667%1.1413.5
Anubis367%1.0617.7
Inferno20%0.518.0
Overpass1100%0.7414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
31.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
11.47HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4278% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.3036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.103%4 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0114%4 Nov →
mirage13–100.0119%4 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.1013%3 Nov →
anubis13–80.0514%3 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0511%3 Nov →
train13–110.0412%31 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.029%31 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0414%31 Oct →
dust212–12-0.096%30 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.054%27 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0319%22 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0715%22 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0311%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0315%21 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.033%21 Oct →
dust26–130.0820%21 Oct →
dust28–13-0.083%21 Oct →
train13–10-0.0526%21 Oct →
office13–7-0.027%21 Oct →
train5–130.0015%19 Oct →
dust213–60.0022%19 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0410%19 Oct →
mirage5–130.0120%13 Oct →
mirage0–6-0.070%13 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0513%5 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0414%5 Oct →
dust213–20.0321%5 Oct →
mirage9–130.0318%1 Oct →
dust215–150.0519%1 Oct →
mirage0–10-0.047%30 Sept →
nuke13–40.0510%30 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0725%30 Sept →
anubis5–130.0313%25 Sept →
nuke10–130.0018%25 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0612%25 Sept →
cache13–80.1028%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0614%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0216%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0811%25 Sept →
dust27–4-0.0629%25 Sept →
anubis11–130.0319%15 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0313%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0021%15 Sept →
nuke10–130.079%15 Sept →
mirage11–130.0119%9 Sept →
cache5–130.0315%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0519%28 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.064%28 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.068%28 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0412%22 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0722%4 Aug →
nuke10–130.0215%2 Aug →
mirage3–60.0314%2 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0319%2 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0414%2 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0323%1 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0123%1 Aug →
ancient3–90.0320%29 Jul →
anubis13–90.0220%29 Jul →
nuke13–110.0518%29 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0116%29 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0714%29 Jul →
overpass5–130.0821%24 Jul →
inferno13–100.0422%24 Jul →
dust25–130.0218%24 Jul →
mirage13–70.0211%23 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0221%23 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0111%22 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0814%21 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0613%21 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0112%21 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0211%21 Jul →
cache10–130.0113%21 Jul →
ancient6–130.0012%20 Jul →
mirage11–130.0317%20 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0411%20 Jul →
cache16–140.0115%19 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.055%19 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0813%19 Jul →
anubis10–130.0313%18 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0516%18 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.078%18 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.026%18 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0811%15 Jul →
nuke12–120.0311%15 Jul →
dust213–00.0825%15 Jul →
mirage12–120.0214%15 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0414%13 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0316%13 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0124%13 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0614%13 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0120%13 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0621%13 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0811%12 Jul →
fachwerk12–12-0.0026%12 Jul →
ancient3–130.0630%12 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.019%11 Jul →
nuke13–30.0124%11 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0418%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.