Patrick The Star

Patrick The Star — CS2 Stats

76561198128032873[U:1:167767145]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

263Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,761Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,332Blue band · top ~47.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 263 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 24 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,332 +1,725 26 Mar22 Sept · 23 days played
8,68312,332peak 12,33226 Mar22 Sept
12,332Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-03-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,000 below peak (12,332)
  • +1,592 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,649 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,668 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1
Win rate0%
K/D1.25
Headshot %36%

Measured 17 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,195), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.7%42.7%43.8%6.1% short
Shot accuracy17.9%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.860.991.020.15 short
Match win rate33.8%43.9%44.7%10.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPatrick The StarFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,332 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning39
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40564Last 10040%Win rateLLWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility2.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning3.9
Utility2.4
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time629ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 11.0% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 18 Jun
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · inferno, 10 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · eldorado, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23111248%-0.03
nukeD2271532%-0.04
anubisC146843%-0.04
cacheC125742%-0.04
infernoD92722%-0.02
ancientC83538%-0.03
dust2S64267%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.04
eldorado1010%-0.04
italy1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,971Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
3,021Matches
33.8%Match win rate
37.7%Headshot %
17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
5,291MVPs
742Hours (in match)
1,121Bombs planted
285Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP7,368
AK-476,520
SG 5531,697
AUG1,603
MP71,522

Lifetime map wins

2,126inferno
1,455dust2
1,104vertigo
849train
829nuke
475lake
405office
206cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

50Matches
48%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
64.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1145%0.8211.3
Cache771%0.8213.4
Nuke650%0.7010.5
Anubis540%0.609.8
Inferno450%0.7812.5
Dust2450%1.0019.8
Ancient425%0.7712.5
Overpass1100%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
69.3%Counter-strafing
13.1°Preaim
637msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
6.63HE damage / grenade
3.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.1375° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2052% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4739 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke1–13-0.0819%11 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0119%10 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0119%9 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0510%8 Sept
cache8–13-0.0325%7 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0018%7 Sept
nuke9–50.000%5 Sept
mirage2–130.0211%5 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0716%4 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0519%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0517%4 Sept
dust213–100.0022%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0015%4 Sept
dust213–10.0610%3 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0716%3 Sept
cache13–80.0417%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.077%3 Sept
mirage3–00.010%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0314%3 Sept
eldorado5–9-0.0416%3 Sept
mirage13–50.0413%3 Sept
nuke7–13-0.067%3 Sept
mirage10–130.0114%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.050%3 Sept
cache13–3-0.0622%2 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0012%2 Sept
mirage13–80.0112%2 Sept
cache16–14-0.049%2 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0216%2 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0410%2 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0319%30 Aug
inferno8–13-0.059%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0912%29 Aug
mirage13–12-0.0022%29 Aug
anubis13–8-0.099%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0324%29 Aug
inferno6–130.0135%29 Aug
nuke7–5-0.066%30 Jul
mirage13–9-0.025%28 Jul
cache6–13-0.113%27 Jul
nuke1–13-0.048%27 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0725%27 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0220%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0111%26 Jul
anubis11–130.0112%26 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0715%26 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0614%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.107%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0010%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0119%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0411%23 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0427%22 Jul
cache7–130.0229%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0317%20 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0129%19 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0319%14 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0711%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0118%13 Jul
mirage13–20.0220%13 Jul
cache13–5-0.0521%23 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0317%23 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0133%23 Jun
cache12–12-0.0527%19 Jun
ancient8–11-0.0320%18 Jun
nuke13–40.0920%18 Jun
inferno9–50.0841%10 Jun
overpass3–11-0.0115%8 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0522%8 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0716%27 May
ancient8–13-0.0215%25 May
mirage9–13-0.0713%25 May
italy12–12-0.0121%24 May
anubis3–13-0.0018%21 May
mirage13–10-0.094%24 Apr
nuke3–13-0.109%23 Apr
nuke0–12-0.0911%22 Apr
mirage15–15-0.058%22 Apr
anubis12–16-0.049%28 Mar
ancient13–11-0.038%28 Mar
mirage5–13-0.070%27 Mar
nuke11–130.0112%27 Mar
dust213–11-0.047%27 Mar
ancient4–13-0.047%27 Mar
mirage13–2-0.0614%27 Mar
ancient8–13-0.069%27 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0912%27 Mar
nuke0–13-0.070%27 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0221%27 Mar
overpass4–1-0.070%26 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0314%26 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0511%26 Mar
dust23–13-0.083%26 Mar
mirage16–13-0.106%26 Mar
nuke6–130.0017%25 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0715%24 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0810%24 Mar
anubis1–13-0.1212%24 Mar
nuke13–10.0615%24 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0015%24 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0610%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →