NOTreq

NOTreq — CS2 Stats

VE76561198295914735[U:1:335649007]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

314Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,482Blue band · top ~47% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 314 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 22 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,482 +2,523 22 Mar12 Sept · 24 days played
3,51611,482peak 11,48222 Mar12 Sept
11,482Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-03-22

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,482
  • +3,818 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,835 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,518 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNOTreqFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,482 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning43
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.3
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time620ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 19 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 3–11 · overpass, 8 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · vertigo, 26 Jul
13–0Biggest win · cache, 24 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2181338%-0.02
cacheS1711665%0.00
nukeC1661038%-0.04
anubisD1551033%-0.03
infernoC104640%-0.05
dust2B84450%-0.04
ancientA85363%-0.01
overpass21150%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.08
boulder1010%-0.02
shelter1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
40%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
56.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
5%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1030%0.587.9
Ancient633%0.6110.5
Nuke560%0.8313.4
Inferno450%0.466.8
Anubis333%0.578.3
Vertigo333%0.688.3
Dust2367%0.9012.3
Cache250%0.6412.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
627msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
11.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4615 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.649% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0316%9 Sept
cache2–13-0.0332%9 Sept
anubis13–90.0212%8 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0612%7 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0316%4 Sept
ancient13–70.0126%4 Sept
mirage13–50.0226%3 Sept
nuke7–130.0017%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0512%3 Sept
cache13–3-0.057%2 Sept
anubis13–90.0225%2 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0113%2 Sept
cache16–140.0324%2 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0115%2 Sept
anubis13–50.044%2 Sept
mirage13–20.009%2 Sept
mirage14–160.0118%1 Sept
cache13–60.0924%1 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0117%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.0624%1 Sept
dust213–8-0.0115%1 Sept
nuke13–50.0913%1 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0517%30 Aug
ancient13–110.0523%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0411%30 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0722%30 Aug
cache13–110.0115%30 Aug
inferno4–6-0.1229%29 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0622%29 Aug
cache5–13-0.0418%28 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0211%27 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0416%27 Aug
ancient3–13-0.104%27 Aug
nuke11–4-0.0319%27 Aug
nuke4–130.0218%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0213%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.1115%21 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0710%21 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0644%21 Aug
inferno13–1-0.0111%21 Aug
anubis13–40.0118%21 Aug
ancient13–50.0126%20 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0720%20 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0216%20 Aug
mirage13–60.0921%19 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0124%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0617%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0423%16 Aug
cache13–7-0.0330%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0232%15 Aug
cache13–100.0424%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0719%8 Aug
nuke16–130.0512%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0429%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.0523%27 Jul
inferno4–13-0.085%27 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0319%27 Jul
ancient1–8-0.0138%26 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0916%26 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0329%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0422%26 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0516%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.0934%26 Jul
vertigo9–6-0.0844%26 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0320%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0523%24 Jul
cache13–00.0332%24 Jul
ancient13–110.0228%24 Jul
nuke13–4-0.058%24 Jul
dust213–8-0.0421%24 Jul
cache13–11-0.0128%23 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0613%22 Jul
cache11–130.0121%20 Jul
mirage10–130.0127%13 Jul
dust210–13-0.0224%13 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0215%10 Jul
shelter6–13-0.0516%10 Jul
cache13–80.0620%8 Jul
inferno0–9-0.1811%8 Jul
dust28–13-0.100%29 Jun
anubis0–13-0.0228%29 Jun
cache13–70.0225%28 Jun
anubis0–8-0.0323%27 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0422%26 Jun
dust24–13-0.0319%26 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0435%26 Jun
nuke6–9-0.1717%25 Jun
inferno9–40.0714%25 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0718%24 Jun
inferno9–30.0135%24 Jun
cache13–50.0810%23 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0721%23 Jun
overpass13–80.0216%23 Jun
nuke2–9-0.230%23 Jun
mirage13–90.0919%12 Jun
overpass3–11-0.0160%8 Jun
mirage8–130.0313%8 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0726%21 May
mirage2–13-0.0817%22 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0414%22 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →