Sam Handwich — CS2 Stats

76561198125127428[U:1:164861700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,139Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,165Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#221339 of 252020 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (42 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+30Tracked matches · now 3,139

−23.3ppWin rate · 75.0% → 51.7%

Rating over time

2,112Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

55Days played since 2026-06-14

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning62

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–36–9Last 10055%Win rateLTLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

0–4–1 · 0% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 30%
Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

3–6–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

6–13–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.1

Utility4.2

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.2

Utility4.2

Mechanics8.6

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time535ms−77ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms

Headshot accuracy24.5%+3.2%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 4 Jul →

52%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · nuke, 11 Oct →

375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · office, 20 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 66% over 62cacheWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	62	41–21	66%	0.05
cache	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.01
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02
mirage	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
office	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
rush_001	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.07
shelter	—	2	2–0	100%	0.11
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

103,044Lifetime kills

1.08K/D · Top 50% of tracked players

4,885Matches

48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

54.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

2.2%Shot accuracy

13,934MVPs

2,831Hours (in match)

3,482Bombs planted

1,417Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4751,932

M4A4 / M4A1-S19,688

MP95,488

P2000 / USP-S5,460

Desert Eagle4,540

Glock-183,980

Galil AR2,646

MAC-102,206

AWP1,228

Tec-9669

Lifetime map wins

14,164nuke

3,525vertigo

2,497dust2

2,269train

1,963inferno

409office

179cbble

158lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

332Matches

56%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

80.0ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	99	65%	1.29	16.7
Anubis	79	58%	1.25	17.1
Mirage	52	60%	1.00	14.2
Nuke	23	48%	1.23	17.7
Train	20	60%	1.30	17.1
Vertigo	19	53%	1.10	17.5
Dust2	14	21%	0.95	14.4
Inferno	10	10%	0.67	10.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy

38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.9%Spray accuracy

88.5%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

527msReaction time

33.1%T opening success

60.9%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

2.91HE damage / grenade

10.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.478 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.126% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	4–13	-0.04	24%	14 Oct →
nuke	12–12	0.11	52%	11 Oct →
train	11–13	0.08	24%	11 Oct →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	29%	11 Oct →
cache	2–13	0.02	25%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.07	21%	7 Oct →
rush_001	3–7	-0.02	21%	1 Oct →
rush_001	0–4	-0.13	23%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.10	20%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	14%	29 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.01	31%	22 Sept →
cache	6–13	0.04	9%	22 Sept →
vertigo	3–13	-0.04	39%	22 Sept →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	44%	20 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	26%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.17	37%	19 Sept →
nuke	6–13	0.07	28%	15 Sept →
nuke	5–13	0.07	26%	11 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.10	20%	8 Sept →
anubis	25–22	0.00	18%	7 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.00	31%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.18	22%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.20	22%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	28%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.07	17%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	9%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.04	20%	22 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.03	26%	20 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.00	21%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.05	20%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	30%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	15%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	19%	9 Aug →
nuke	10–3	-0.00	25%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.09	27%	3 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.01	33%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	23%	2 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.01	28%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.06	16%	2 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	13%	31 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	17%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	16%	29 Jul →
nuke	3–13	0.00	33%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.05	43%	25 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	18%	22 Jul →
boulder	13–6	0.05	16%	21 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	15%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.03	34%	21 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	22%	17 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	20%	17 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.08	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.06	20%	12 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.04	16%	11 Jul →
shelter	13–1	0.08	22%	11 Jul →
shelter	13–2	0.14	28%	9 Jul →
fachwerk	7–13	-0.05	13%	9 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	18%	8 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	20%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.09	24%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	23%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.03	27%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.02	13%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.24	17%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.08	17%	3 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	11%	3 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.02	15%	3 Jul →
poseidon	5–9	0.05	24%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.09	15%	2 Jul →
nuke	7–0	0.12	43%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.07	15%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	16%	30 Jun →
office	11–13	0.03	31%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.05	12%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.11	21%	29 Jun →
alpine	13–9	-0.00	13%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.12	12%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.05	18%	28 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.11	26%	28 Jun →
office	12–12	-0.00	23%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.04	36%	28 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.10	33%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.02	17%	27 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.09	16%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.03	25%	27 Jun →
nuke	7–1	-0.07	21%	27 Jun →
train	2–13	-0.03	17%	26 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.01	30%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.05	21%	21 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	16%	21 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.04	24%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.10	21%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	23%	20 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.13	28%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.22	18%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.03	15%	17 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.01	22%	17 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.06	14%	15 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	22%	14 Jun →